The very fact that in two post you went from "no evidence of collusion" to "the collusion isn't illegal" and "something, something Clinton!" is pretty telling of what you know deep inside.
As far as Clinton, she's not President, she will never be President, she's not dictating policy. So bringing her up is now and always will be a silly deflection from Trump, the person who won, is in office and is dictating policy.
tl;dr version: If you can't defend Trump without going "but Clinton!", you have no defense.
Im not denying they had contact with Russians, it depends on who the contact was, and what it was actually about.
I really would like you to tell me what you actually think the Russians did in the election, besides the line "fake news, Russian trolls and Maceonidnan Content Farmers."
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Leave me to my schadenfreude, it's delicious and I'm not sharing. Anyhow.
Ben Shapiro thinks Bannon might go after Trump and/or Trump's cabinet members with the leverage he has in Breitbart.
"That also makes sense of Bannon’s behavior over the last week: he’s preparing for the possibility of war with Trump.
Bannon is deeply vengeful, and supremely ambitious. He has already held the most powerful job he will ever have - unless, of course, his new job is to destroy Trump from the outside. And he set the groundwork for that job over the past week.
First, he pushed Trump not to alienate the alt-right - Bannon’s base - and succeeded. Bannon was widely credited in the media with encouraging Trump’s bizarre Tuesday press conference, at which Trump rehabilitated the alt-right and said there were “very fine people” protesting with white supremacists in Charlottesville. Trump could have easily carved off the alt-right and not lost much; Bannon, however, had to keep them in his pocket. Without them, he is merely another former government employee searching for a home. With them, he can threaten Trump with political Armageddon." -snip
Oh man, can't wait if this is true. Hack site Breibart loved by many on the Right/Trumpers, not being all so friendly with Trump now. What a shitshow and we all have front seats
the patron saint of paranoia and psoriasis vs the mighty orange babyman.
(please log in to view the image)
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Huh? I've agreed and disagreed with Shapiro in the past. He's one of the more sensible Rightwing columnist, imo. I for one was glad when he quit Breitbart for it's shitty bullying actions.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 18th, 2017 06:51 PM
nice
