Again, feel free about arguing against the Theological problem I just provided. Or you can find papal documents confirming that at least in catholicism, you don't need baptism in order to be saved. That already confirms that in the bigger christian population of the world, your statement is false.
But to be fair, my statement was literaly incorrect. You should be christian (in the way you live) to go to heaven, you just don't need baptism or any specific religious rite to be one.
Do I hope there is a god? I am somewhat indifferent. If there is a god then fine, if not then oh well. It's an interesting question to think about, but not one that I am really emotionally invested in what the answer is. There could be a god and no afterlife, in which case I am even more indifferent, since the chances of me ever finding out about such a god are even less likely. Though it would obviously be amazing if at one point science advanced to the point that we were capable of directly detecting and proving the existence of a creator.
Do I hope there is an afterlife? Yes, to the extent that I would prefer immortality to morality in most cases. Obviously, though, I don't hope that there is a Hell for god to send me to.
Last edited by Afro Cheese on Aug 26th, 2017 at 11:46 PM
I'm not talking about the bigger population of the world. I'm talking about Fundamental Christianity. They do believe you have to accept Jesus to be saved and go to heaven rather than hell. That is a fact. *See Scripture passages that Rob posted on previous page* Now, the degree to which people believe it is a different thing. So whether or not they join the mission effort and try to convert people (fulfilling the "Great Commission" from Matthew 28:18-20). I don't know polls around the world in other major Christian countries, but that is Christianity. I'm not sure what you're even trying to say is false. I went to Christian high school and have been to many a church here in the southern United States. And some are more lax on this doctrine than others, but that is Christian theology.
Technically you're right, but I think that there is a reason most Atheists don't believe in an afterlife. The main reasons that an afterlife was presumed in the first place was based on a religious conception of reality.
I'm not an Atheist since I believe in God, or some great Force I'd call God. But I doubt it's the Biblical one or Allah or Buddah or whoever, since you cannot attribute human limitations and understandings to something divine and doing so only to gain power is absolutely deplorable.
And with regards to the Afterlife, well I hope I'm right when I say there's something nice that exists when this miserable existance is over; We'll see when we die, I suppose.
As my second comment implied, the definition of what constitutes to be a Christian (or what does "accepting Christ" even means) weights heavily in the definition of salvation. Any number of people can argue back and forth about what teaching precedes others in canon and importance, but the fact is, if anyone is saved, then it's automatically a Christian since salvation comes from Christ.
Under that light the statement "You don't go to hell just for not being Christian in christianity" is literally false.
This is true, I am an atheist. I believe there is an afterlife. Not a specific "heaven" or "hell" and I do not think our choices in this life have any impact on your afterlife. I just think there are multiple planes of existence.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Fit yourself, I'm just honestly trying to explain a logical stance here.
This is the short version of it:
Saved = Christian
since
Salvation = Christ
even if the individual never interacted with religion at all, he'd need to be considered Christian if he was saved. That makes salvation for non-Christians a logical impossibility.
I can't figure out how an actual "heaven" wouldn't be akin to something we see in the tv series Supernatural, where everyone has their own little separate heaven.
Since a persons idea of what is heaven would vary. There is no other way you could accommodate everyone.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
The place where everyone instantly becomes responsible and generous, you can make mistakes but you always own them. Heaven = Infinite responsability, not its opposite.
Oh, certainly. They go hand in hand for most people. Usually, the lack of belief behind an atheist outlook extends beyond God/Amaterasu/Zeus/wtfever.
I'm not convinced there is an afterlife personally, so I'm definitely a more typical atheist. I know a few who differ though.
I think the problem is that, even though it's supposedly common knowledge, people still treat atheism as a set of beliefs when it's not. It's really just a word that describes one thing, and only that one thing. I've had this discussion with "closeted" atheists who felt like their belief in the afterlife meant they weren't atheist, despite not believing in any god.
For many, it also makes it easier to criticize by framing it as a religion, which is absurd. They then get to point the finger and say "See! You do it too!"
Last edited by StyleTime on Aug 28th, 2017 at 10:52 PM
Tbh man this feels like a matter of interpretation. Based on quotes posted in the thread if some Christians were to tell me that I'm going to hell for either not being baptized or not believing in Jesus and specifically quote passages from the Bible as the source of that beliefe.. they wouldn't be wrong. In fact it seems like that is the most accurate interpretation of what's actually written. An interpretation that most Christians simply don't go along with because most Christians are nice people who don't go around threateing people with eternal damnation.
__________________
Azula: My mommy didn't love me so I'm going to burn down your village.
It also depends on a lot of things besides interpretation of the text. The Scriptures are, of course, meant to be interpreted, Jesus spokes in parables and didn't leave any written texts behind, he uses strong imagery included but not limited to the End of Times, cutting off's one arm, Jean the Baptist being Elijah the prophet. The same people who ask you to read a passage literally will forcibly tell you another part is allegorical, or that Creation is entirely inconsistent. So what's always in the air is "which authority should be the highest" regarding an specific interpretation.
There are the voluntary omissions when reading these texts. Jesus's message has very strong anti-religious undertones that are, obviously, played down by Religious authorities.
I do think you make a fair point about people that use the Bible not being literally wrong in their way of reading Scripture. as long as they don't act against the Fundamentals of Christianity,
they have a religious freedom of interpretation. Just to cite an example, the Catholic Church allows believers to read the Genesis literally or to admit evolution as they see fit, as long as either interpretation doesn't hurt their faiths or that of others.
Oh, they're definitely wrong, lol, but I know what you mean. Within their crazy worldview they are just going on the most reasonable interpretation of the text.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 26th, 2017 04:24 PM
