Also Rob, you say here what you feel Trump should not say, but what do you think he should be saying? If you think Kim would be set off enough to fire off nukes due to some tough talk, what words do you think will stop him from utilizing nuclear weapons?
Would you agree someone who would use nukes like that is pretty much just looking for any excuse to use them?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
You're comparing a country testing a possible H-bomb with a country's will to actually use one, randomly no less. That's stupid and retarded, as many countries have tested nukes, but only one has actually used one offensively.
So your scare-tactic based premise is laughable and can be dismissed.
As far as what Trump should say? Don't really know, but I also didn't run for president claiming I had all the answers. But considering he's claimed to be the greatest negotiator and deal maker, he should negotiate with NK. Set up a trade deal with them, that way they're buying our shit and not China's for a start.
Trump's going to have to concede to NK and condone that they're going to be a true nuclear power in the region, which will mean SK might get nukes and we'll have another Pakistan/India nuke dick waving contest. That is if NK can get them before 2021.
What will be funny, all the "fire and fury" Trumpers will fall in line and applaud Trump's move, when previously they wanted NK's heartblood.
Kim is a billionaire with nigh absolute control of a country where he gets to have orgies, watch movies and eat sushi all day, do you think he's going to risk losing that and his life just to nuke Guam? His power rest on his ability to talk tough, look tough and to now one-up Trump since Trump like a retard has decided to play into his dictator micro-penis waving games.
That's the problem. Trump can't declare war, but he could order a missile strike which would likely push Kim to retaliate or look weak and then we have a possible war.
You misunderstood me, he isn't having to deal with what he said. Its not like people rational people are going around saying "Well Trump said he would nuke them, why hasn't he." its not like he's constantly being asked in the media "Why hasn't Trump nuked them."
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
Keep in mind that it was due to complete inaction on the part of Obama administration that led to North Korea becoming a nuclear power and advancing its delivery platforms.
Unfortunately, Obama administration saw in Libya a greater threat - height of stupidity.
The Left would do something about Little Kimmy but they are too busy fighting Real Evil... Like Confederate Statues....Those things can trigger ya!!!!!
__________________ Banned 30 days for the Crime of "ETC"... and when I "ETC" I do it HARD!!!
As I said in the other NK thread, there's the precedent this sets to truly worry about. Whether or not Kim is crazy enough to use his nukes, which he most likely(and hopefully) isn't, allowing that kind of belligerent rogue dictatorship to become a nuclear power is a pretty big geopolitical L for the United States and the west in general. The implications extend beyond the immediate region, as well. Iran will be sure to follow. The left's all-too-causal attitude about this precedent is pretty remarkable since they were historically the ones who were the strongest opponents to nuclear proliferation in general when it was between the United States and the Soviet Union. It seems as if everyone is now completely buying into the assumption that nuclear weapons are only for show. Let's hope that assumption is correct.