One could almost say that Obama was displaying weasel-like behavior then.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Remember though, on more than one occasion when he said he didn't have the power to do it he also lamented the fact he didn't have the power to do it.
It is so bizarre to hear him talk about how we are a nation of laws, oh please. Did you hear how the dipshit Mayor of Chicago responded? Essentially said it doesn't matter what is decided, said this would be a "Trump free zone".
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Notice how you rarely see people place any blame on the parents who brought the kids here illegally?
I also think the people already covered under DACA will most likely not be deported. They will be allowed to stay.
However, getting rid of this now takes away incentive for people to try to come here illegally because they think at least their kids can stay. So that is good.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
And how good would their lives have been if they were forced to separate?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
And the solution to that is to come here through legal means and it won't happen, so you are correct it is easy.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Hold on. I never said that Trump doing this was illegal. I don't think it is. It's very clearly within his power to make decisions like this. The question was whether it was actually unconstitutional for Obama to implement DACA.
The link you provided doesn't do much to support the idea that it is. The idea that the SC ruled that DAPA was unconstitutional is incorrect, as your own link says it ended in a 4-4 tie vote, and was essentially kicked back down to the lower courts. A tie vote is not a vote that something is unconstitutional.
Furthermore, as the link you provided notes, DAPA is not DACA.
It says the following "First, the outcome in U.S. v Texas has no direct impact on the original DACA program, which was implemented in August 2012...DACA has survived several legal challenges, including one brought by a group of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and another by Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Both were dismissed in federal court for lack of standing. "
So to summarize, a tie vote in the SC is not a vote that DAPA is unconstitutional, and it's certainly not evidence that a seperate piece of legislation is unconstitutional.
And also why I want Democrats to stop whining about laws being enforced when they are so selective in when they want them enforced. Like when the illegal was awarded nearly 200 grand from San Francisco cuz they turned him over to ICE...the excuse was "well they broke the law" lol. That is how some defended it.
Where is that "but they broke the law" now?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
It is true, you accidentally confirmed it in other sections of the board, Mr. County Care. Like the unblinking Eye of Sauron, Robtard sees all. Be mad now.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 5th, 2017 10:17 PM
