If it's in character, post clips of them doing so.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I did answer your question. You not liking the answer doesn't make it wrong, no matter what you believe.
No, it is not. Because they have never demonstrated the logical capacity to do so, even when hard pressed when Species 8472 was walloping Drones around like Hulk on meth. You have no basis to make this claim outside of what YOU would have done with the collective's tech and an audience's foresight. That is not how debates such as this work.
Incorrect. Bullets have proven effective against Borg adaptive tech before. As have Batleths, Gun stocks to the head, or in Data's case, a solid punch. Also displayed by Species 8472. Unfortunately, they do not adapt to physical trauma and this has been proven repeatedly. You do not get to assert to the contrary without evidence. You have none, from any source anywhere, to do so. So you are objectively incorrect.
Oh how simultaneously gracious and utterly bull headed of you. No, agree to disagree if you want to, but no. Not more logical, and our side is not asenine for having proof. You are being asenine by spouting claims without so much as an inkling of proof.
__________________
"I have become Death, the destroyer of worlds..."
Last edited by Darkstorm Zero on Sep 28th, 2017 at 05:11 AM
Their technology is well sufficient in creating kinetic force fields.
There is no way in hell that they don't eventually create kinetic forcefields after many die. I'm done with the argument. You guys are very illogical. It's about what's reasonable.
No, it's about what actually happens on screen, as we argue in character.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
If it's in character, show examples of them doing it.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I don't think H1 understands what in character means.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
And? When have they created them for drone usage? The only time it's ever been deployed anywhere by the collective is as a corridor barricade. They do not use them as personal shields on every drone. We do not know why, and it does not matter, that is how the Borg operate. That is how they have always operated, and will always operate. They do not evolve new tactics, because that is one of their weakness.
Don't get upset because the Borg's own characterization undoes whatever tech edge they may have had. We didn't do that. Hell, if you wanted Borg with OUR competence driving them, then this would be a different story. Hell, Spacebattles have vs matches with that sort of stipulation. Audience competency alters the way anyone functions within a vs. Example, imagine we ran Sauron's forces during the war of the ring. Imagine the Empire from Star Wars ran with competency. You'll find that a lot of flaws and faults would be phased out in such matches. But, it would not be the real Dark lord's forces, or Palatine's Empire. Same vein, what you are arguing for is not the genuine real Borg Collective.
h1 never argues how things are supposed to be. He argues what he wants them to be.
"I know the Borg have never not once shown the ability to adapt to physical attacks. Because they get hit with and are damaged/killed by physical attacks all the time. Buuuuut they can totally adapt. They just don't want to. So clearly they still win."
It is faulty to assume that since they didn't evolve shields after 3 deaths then they will never evolve them (even after 100 deaths). There were time(s) the Borg adapted immediately after 1 death and there were time(s) they adapted after multiple deaths of the same attack. Therefore, the number of deaths doesn't determine when they evolve.
It's all about
1. Is it WELL within their technology
2. Will they reasonably choose to employ that evolution if they can achieve it.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
We go by what the borg HAVE SHOWN to do. They have never done nor will they ever do what you you want them too.. I know this because I have watched every Star Trek episode from Kirk to Picard to Sisko to Janeway to Archer.. I have even started watching Star Trek Discovery.. I own all the Star Trek movies on dvd/blu ray