10 to 1 says you phrased the question in such way to get the answer you want. Nobody trusts you.
Accept the challenge, that way everyone can see the exact wording of the question IMP is being asked to answer.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's actually painful having these discussions with him, because he seems to think he knows everything better than anyone else, even people who have been around here a lot longer than he has.
He wasn't even here for the whole MoS Supes tectonic plate debacle, which was what pretty much settled this specific discussion previously.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
He doesn't seem to understand that statements without feats are worthless and if the statement does have feats backing them up, then why waste time with the statements, post the actual feats.
He's not being subtle or clever, everyone knows he's harping on statements because he doesn't actually have any feats he can list.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Exactly. And Impediment himself has said as much before, as seen with the tectonic plate thing I already mentioned. Unsupported statements or offscreen showings hold virtually no weight in these debates, as we lack the proper context within which to quantify them.
But just look at the Cap slugfest thread. I post feats or examples for every claim I actually make, and ask him to back his claims in return and provide evidence to counter what I posted. But instead of debating properly, he tries to strawman me and make things up that I never said, while spouting his opinion as fact. He's a lot like H1 in that regard.
Edit: Also, actually, what's more, using a character statement like Stryker's in a debate where things from separate universes are being compared is nonsensical. Because, in order for his statement to actually be factual, he would need to have intimate knowledge of both universes, everything in them, and what effect all of the different materials etc. would have against adamantium. Which he doesn't. Because the MCU is a completely difference universe to the one he exists in.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Last edited by TheVaultDweller on Oct 9th, 2017 at 04:40 AM
Oh, and SilentMaster you should be grateful that I am not as stupid as you, else you would have gotten banned for 6 months. (Which is not true, since you clearly have multiple accounts in this forum.)
TheVaultDweller, your disappoint me, i thought you to be a more serious debater. I realize you are just another Jerk in this forum ... Really sad.
__________________
Last edited by Josh_Alexander on Oct 10th, 2017 at 01:05 AM
Statements without Feats backing them up are worthless.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Statements without Feats backing them up are worthless and as of yet you have posted no actual Feats that surpass Cap's Shield tanking a charged hammershot
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
As you have posted no feats that surpass the charged hammerstrike, you lose.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
No. You've got no proves that Adamantium wouldn't stand it. So that's not a real argument.
You need to know when to back down Silent Master. Why can't you back down now? I backed down with the Comic's are valid statement. Why can't you? Backing down isn't bad. Not backing down when you've lost is.
I have a feat for vibranium that you can't match, therefore you lose.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.