Lol, explain yourself. Cause he never used magic to stop Gellert.
Hey! Voldemort has the advantage! Albus was forced to protect harry. His movements were limmited. Unlike Voldemort who only has to protect himself, Albus had to protect Harry and himself. Albus was in a defence position.
Okay. Gellert was never defeated with a wand, but with a beast. Voldemort couldnt win the duel with Albus nor with Potter. Grindelwald is a better duelist.
No. It is known that Gellert was a better duelist. Go research if you dont believe me.
Voldemort was a better dark Lord over all, but not a better duelist. Dont confuse the terms.
His beast is magical and he controlled what it did to restrain Gellert's arms.
Albus was dueling with Voldemort while Harry hung back. Albus still attacked with sending the flames back and using the water bubble. Those are using spells to attack Voldemort.
No, the battle ended in a stalemate with Albus looking worse after their duel.
Who cares ? He was easily defeated whether it's with a wand or not. He will,lose to Albus one on one. Voldemort defeated Harry when he disarmed him. He won earlier in that scene. That's one way in which you can win by disarming the other wizard.
Voldemort was a better duelist and seeing him go toe to toe with Albus and the most powerful wand in existence while Gellert lost despite being the wielder of the elder wand.
The beast cant use a wand. Grindelwald wasnt defeated by a Wand. He was defeated by beast, which is different.
Lol, it proves he is a better Duelist. Taking it solo against 20 Aurors is something Voldemort could NEVER replicate. He couldnt disarm Gellert. Voldemort isnt a duelist. Hr lost to Harry in the end, and failed to kill Albus.
Again, stop ignoring facts. The Elder wand has to chose the wearer in order to woek properly. Gellert never had full control over the wand. Voldemort failed to kill an old wizzard who was only defending himself and Harry. He also failed to defeat Harry.
Voldemort isn an exceptional duelist. He is a better Dark Lord but not that good in duels.
I didn't say the beast used a wand. A wizard easily bested him bsince he was overwhelmed.
Says you. Speculation. He lost. You're ignoring the context. In OOTP he disarmed and defeated Harry.
We shall see but the elder wand resisted Voldemort for Harry so quit being a blatant hypocrite. This is why people get frustrated with you. He defeated Harry right before Albus showed up. You just repeat the same old stuff.
It wasn't and you're just showing you can't stick to a point and have to jump around to stay in the fray
You made a claim that I was copying your answer, I rebutted that I focus on the topic and facts while you just back whomever gives you the biggest boner. Opposing views offer the opportunity for an open debate. Why do I have to explain simple shit to you?
If you can duel someone like Dumbledore and do reasonable well (not that I think he'd ever beat Dumbledore in a fair duel), you'd have to be pretty damn good IMO. Grindelwald just hasn't ever gone up against anyone of that level to measure against like Voldemort has.