Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Well that's part of the point I'm making. I don't think it should be a crime and thus don't think it should be involuntarily made a matter of public record as a consequence of my position that it shouldn't be a crime.
Agreed, if you do drugs and commit crimes those crimes should appear on public record.
Fair enough, but that's more in the realm of what a person voluntarily reveals.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
I've never been caught with illegal drugs. This is because I will not walk around with that shit in my pocket. I take precautions too. I always place it in my trunk. This way if you get pulled over a cop won't smell it. The shit I get SMELLS. It smells good, but you can tell it's weed immediately.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Why? If you're going to be branding someone for life, then why are they doing time?
Why should the government actively aid in the sabotaging of people's lives?
And BTW, part of the reason we have so many criminals is because those who get out are always coming back, largely because of how hard it is to get back on your feet once you've already paid for your crimes.
Seems we do, but at least one ruling said we don't. Or rather, there is a qualifier.
"In its 2000 ruling, Alexander v Mineta, the Court decided the 600,000 or so (mostly black) residents of Washington D.C. have no legal recourse for their complete lack of voting representation in Congress (they have one “representative” in the House who can speak, but cannot vote). The Court affirmed the district court’s interpretation that our Constitution “does not protect the right of all citizens to vote, but rather the right of all qualified citizens to vote.” And it’s state legislatures that wield the power to decide who is “qualified.”
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
It's not easy to get for tens of thousands of people state by state, that's the point.
The only way you can argue for this policy is pragmatically, and that's going to get you nowhere since you're actively doing a lot of bad for an unknown amount of good.
You can implement voter id once you've made sure voter ID's are easy and free for everyone to access. Untill then though, it's just bad policy.
Well no. I'm not saying that is correct. The ruling was from 2000 so maybe more recent ones changed?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
How is it not easy? It doesn't cost much, and the worst part about it is hanging out at the DMV. I got a state ID when I was 17 in like an hour for 25 bucks
Again, for some people, depending on how much they make, what you consider "not much" can be "a lot". That's the problem with using personal anecdotes as the basis of policy.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 15th, 2017 05:46 PM
