The only way classic Juggernaut would win is if he had his force field. And even then, Unworthy Thor could bfr him. Thor has used lightning for teleportation.
And the axe would definitely work on him. Much less has.
__________________
Last edited by Rage.Of.Olympus on Dec 3rd, 2017 at 11:54 PM
That was a joke. Both participants have to agree to the judges and it would defeat the purpose if they were not impartial. I thought would be obvious with the "India Trump" tag line.
Lol, somehow I predicted this. Thor vs. Juggernaut, why is that complicated? You're so gun-ho! Let's do it!
What exactly is your stance? First differentiate between whether you were referring to Unworthy Thor or Thor without Mjolnir (Even though it's the same character, separated only by mindset). Next, whether you were battle zoning Juggernaut having superior feats OR that he'd beat Thor in a fight. There is a distinction between that. I didn't think I had to make that clear.
Let me make my position clear so that you have clarity when we do this: Yes Thor from JUST the unworthy period has superior feats to anything Juggernaut has done recently. Yes, Unworthy Thor would beat Juggernaut in a fight, in part because he is not magically limited to feats from the last handful of years. I wouldn't do that for either character.
Because from what I gather, you're limiting Thor to just the Unworthy period in feats, aka from the moment he dropped his hammer, while using Juggernaut since his inception?
__________________
Last edited by Rage.Of.Olympus on Dec 4th, 2017 at 02:19 AM
I will never judge any debates but the judges have already come forward and he was joking. If Abhi is going to try to weasel out of this by arguing over his stance I'll definitely say I called it. There's a reason so many posters call Abhi out to battlezone him. They are supremely confident they'll win.
I have no issues of Juggernaut vs Thor minus mjolnir. You tried arguing that Unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut and then bitched out with every Thor showing without mjolnir.
I just put a laughing smilie and you started foaming at the mouth.
It's about Unworthy Thor having better feats in general. I have no issues with either Thor without mjolnir or Thor with an axe. It's your claim and if you want to back away, who am I to stop you?
Toughen up snowflake, you're in big leagues now.
So you want your cake and eat it too?
Unworthy Thor is Thor after Original Sin. Anything before is invalid for this form of character as he wasn't unworthy before.
Juggernaut isn't limited by this. I can do Thor vs Juggernaut for the whole history but then you have to forfeit the claim that Unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut.
This was your claim. Not that we are limiting Juggernaut's feats to last few years.
What's it going to be buttercup?
That's what you claimed. Why wouldn't I do so then?
KMC Community Forums
Dec 3rd, 2017 08:35 PM
