You didn't read my post within the context of the argument.
By saying this you're actually supporting my argument. If millions of people are willing to tolerate the bad behavior of men like Bill Clinton and Trump, then how can we trust market forces to be a morals equalizer?
I agree with you, it has worked on numerous occasions. But your philosophy does not guarantee justice, does it? It only argues that justice is statistically favorable.
Just because I hit a home run 5 times in a row, doesn't mean I'm gonna hit home runs forever.
But it does mean that the majority of people want you to hit the home run. Which means that discriminating institutions will fall to the snare of competition.
It is just silly for them to want the government to be forcing folk to make cakes.
And this won't be decided until summer lol. How many other shitty court cases like this are clogging the system?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
The entire foundation of your theory relies on the morality of people, which is variable. Morality is dependent on the region, on the person, on the culture. What is acceptable and what isn't changes at the drop of a dime.
No, it's not. The market has an incentive to meet the needs of displaced customers, as a result, they create competition institutions to earn their vote. The fact is even in the 40's south black people were hired more often then whites.
This is why I say just let the market take care of it.
Take a "no whites allowed" place. I'd laugh at the hypocrisy of such a thing if it didn't garner as much outrage as it would have if it was "no blacks allowed". But if you handed me temporary power from the government and said "what you wanna do" I would say let the place stay open. I would think such a place(whether it is "no whites" or "no blacks") wouldn't do well in business.
The point would come where the choice would be either change your own ways or you lose your business. Which is how it should be. If it remained successful okay, I think it would be the exception and not the rule.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Right, this is a point I have made in this thread multiple times.
One item that is important to remember is that we do NOT live in the same country as 1820's America. It is much different. If you remove the threat of state sanctioned violence against people who wish to conduct business in a discriminatory manner, it will not result in Wild West tumbleweed taverns where "we're the only place in town and we don't take too kindly to your type around here."
That's just asinine. It just doesn't happen. Even in the most racist parts of the US where racism still happens, almost every single business owner cares more about the dollar you have rather than where you like to put your genitals or what your skin color is.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I wonder if the same people saying refusing to bake a cake is a violation of human rights would be willing to denounce affirmative action programs in college admissions... which is a form of discrimination sanctioned by the US Supreme Court.
Or the diversity quotas companies have that haven't been overturned by anti-discrimination legislation...
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Last edited by Emperordmb on Dec 13th, 2017 at 05:47 PM
Firefly is a bit of a bigot, he believes only people from the south are racist. he's actually said that anti-discrimination laws were passed to force the south(and only the south) to accept blacks.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Dec 14th, 2017 at 07:16 PM
Why should the guy participate in any capacity in something the state would not participate in? Gay marriage was not legal at the time in the state. Someone clear this up for me.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.