Your quotes and comments on this subject indicate that you believe criticism of type that I am espousing towards Islam is bigotry. But facts are not bigotted.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I think if anything people view you as one of those western progressive Muslim apologists rather than an actual Muslim.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
That's not hatred or bigotry. At worst, he misunderstood the context you were using the term "proper" in. In the context of Squall's reply, "proper" would refer to members who most 'properly' follow an ideology. That would be those who follow all of what their text dictates rather than cherrypick certain parts and disregard others. A 'proper' supporter of an ideaology fully supports said idealogy.
Off course, proper, doesn't always mean good, but Squall is right, Muslims who only support part of islam aren't as 'proper' in their support of islam as muslims who support the bad and good parts of the text.
The idea that a specific book is to be taken at face value to be interpreted correctly. A quick reminder of how unhistorical literalism is would be to point out history was invented and applied very late in human history.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 13th, 2017 09:04 PM
