Interesting, as this topic could have been easily taken to the Trump thread, but alright bro, I won't reply to the sad little tyke, for you. This favor is for you.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I don't care about anything Obama did, what I care about is whether or not Trump is pursuing action via suing within the current parameters of policy or trying to change policy. I could give less of a shit about what Obama did or deflections to Obama, what this really comes down to for me is that even though I think it's shitty, I'm not sounding the alarm over the President pursuing this issue if he's not crafting policy to do so.
Why don't you stop trying to smear me with attempting to deflect on Obama when I have repeatedly characterized my opinion in the context of what Trump is doing?
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
That was not the distinction being discussed in the post you gave an emoji to. So none of this is really relevant to my critique.
I didn't realize pointing out the content of posts you imply agreement with was considered "smearing."
Last edited by Rockydonovang on Jan 8th, 2018 at 01:33 AM
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
He was making the distinction in regards to the extent and form of action Trump was taking, ie. suing rather than using presidential policy to do so.
The specific point about Trump suing rather than changing or enacting policy was made in the post I gave a thumbs up to which is essentially my point, though the Obama comparison was also there, which I don't really have any interest agreeing or disagreeing with.
Why don't you get some clarification on some of these things first before flying off the handle as you always do, desperate for a quick chance to give yourself the high ground and assume the worst about your opponent. It's annoying, and not the first time you've made incorrect presumptions about your opponent's stances.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
You did clarify your position after initially misrepresenting it, so I don't really see any point to dragging this on longer.
This was rather unnecessary though:
I'm not obligated to seek clarifications when you misrepresent your own intent. If you want to show me clarification, the onus is on yourself, not me.
You have shown me the intent of your post, so we have no further issue, aside from your paranoia about others trying to claim high ground on an online forum.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 8th, 2018 01:03 AM
emoji to. So none of this is really relevant to my critique.
