The discussion has never been about what writer A thinks of a character created by writer B.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
So you admit that the Clippers are more skilled than the thugs in Watchmen?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Lol I totally called it. Knew he would choose to harp on about his interpretation of things instead of the very obvious actual point. It's blatantly obvious that we are not referring what writer A thought of character set B and vice-versa, or comparing fodder with main characters, but H1 will try and act like it is in order to avoid answering the real question. Like I said, he's just a troll.
And a liar too, seeing as my initial point was very clearly a comparison between the fodder Nite Owl fought and fodder Clippers, asking him what he was basing his claims on about Nite Owl being able to beat a group of them (not beating a group of them is not the same as not being better than individual Clippers, so his only attempted counter is somewhat of a strawman as well). So, I didn't even make any claims. Just asked him to back his. But does he do so? No. He first tries to avoid he burden of proof and flip it onto me, and now this crap.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
At worst it's Nite Owl and Rorschach = Fodder Clippers. Therefore Sunny beating large groups of them is more impressive than Ozy only beating 2 comparable people.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
So, h1 isn't even going to attempt to address anything anymore? Just repeat his personal nonsense ABC logic, even though I have already shown that beating random Watchmen nobodies does not mean you can do the same to Badlands Clippers, considering, by feats and screen info, Badlands Clippers > Watchmen thugs.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Yeah, he's basically arguing that beating Watchmen thugs makes them far more skilled than the Clippers. Even though by his own admission Clippers are more skilled than Watchmen thugs.
It's like arguing that defeating random white belts makes someone more skilled than a 7th degree black belt.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You are twisting my argument into something different.
The comparison is nite owl and Rorschach against fodder clippers in h2h only. Not fodder clippers vs thugs. Ozy beat Nite Owl and Rorschach, Sunny beat fodder clippers.
My argument is that the former >>>>the latter in h2h.
Ozy beat the former with absolute ease.
Cops>>>>Thugs
And he has showings of beating multiple thugs without getting touched.
What about nite owl?
They displayed more skill, from kicking to parrying. They beat up a group of thugs without getting touched. Fodder clippers don’t have those feats.
Only you have provided no feats proving that they're more skilled, just baseless claims.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I did. You just conveniently ignored them.
Remember they beat multiple thugs without getting touched.
This is a greater feat then anything the fodder clippers have shown in h2h.
Beating people that you admit are less skilled than the Clippers in no way proves that they're more skilled than sed Clippers.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Beating groups of white belts in no way proves that you're more skilled than a back belt. You're just making things up.
But back to topic, Sunny >>>>Ozy >>>>> Nite owl and Rorschach in skill.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 3rd, 2018 11:37 PM
