1st feat isn’t better than casually bending the gun.
2nd feat isn’t quantifiable because it was with Mjolnir.
A weaker can easily catch the arm of a stronger using the ground. It’s called a block.
Mjolnir feats are unquantifiable.
So again, none of the feats come close to casually bending the gun.
All of the feats I listed were better, H1 is just doing his normal trolling.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You had to dig up this thread? That's some monumental spite
__________________
Thanks for the sig Scot-and for the help with my avatar
When someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown but only 4 to reach out and bchslap them upside down on their head
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I laughed at the "but he can bend a gun" argument. Top notch.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Ha jokes on all of you, the gun was obviously made of adamantium.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
1. Casually implies that someone has multiple times more strength
2. The damage was at least an order greater (Thor only slightly bent the wrist armor where Luddendorf crumpled the gun).
Here's a good analogy.
Someone casually lifting 1 ton off the ground and then throwing it 100ft away vs
Someone lifting 2 ton 1ft off the ground.
Your fallacy lies in thinking since IM wrist armor is more durable (debatable) then it is automatically the greater feat.
Its not, because you are not considering levels of damage and levels of effort.
Only a troll or biased fanboy would think Iron-man's armor being more duable than a WW1 era gun is debatable. Which are you?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 19th, 2018 03:03 AM
