__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
One time Thor tripped and fell and BP was standing nearby.
BP was removed from a full body cast 13 months later.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Nukes don't actually destroy cities. It's not like a DBZ ki blast.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Lets put the cards on the table, since it seems all of you are just bringing fairy tales up here!
Thor (No hammer and Pre Ragnarok):
- He has no feats to really know his potential.
-He is not as good as a fighter as T'Challa or Killmonger
- Is being OUTNUMBERED.
Panthers:
-Vibranium suits which can repulse KE.
- Vibranium claws, which by the way are harder than Loki's knifes.
-Are known elite fighters
- Are arguably faster and more agile.
Freak, it's pretty obvious whose in disadvantage here
I know you guys are enormous Thor lovers, but a hammerless P-R Thor isn't the same!
Okay cards on the table, they don't have the damage output needed to KO Thor meanwhile Thor does have the damage output needed to defeat them.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Loki's magical knives being able to affect Thor isn't proof that Panthers vibranium claws can. You actually have to provide evidence of his claws damaging something on Thor's durability level.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Thor was in the middle of the blast that reduced Sokovia to rubble.
Thor was not killed by this, just KO'ed for a bit. Sokovia was reduced to rubble by the blast.
In order for a blast to reduce a piece of land the size a city or larger, a nuke wont be enough.
Look at nuclear bomb destruction in the past detonations. Hiroshima, Nagasaki were leveled on the surface. Most buildings, houses, structures were destroyed and burned. Other than that the land was ok besides radiation.
Look at detonations by more powerful nukes on small islands on the pacific. The island didnt disappear from the face of the earth. It wasn't in chunks on the bottom of the ocean after the blast. The island is still there, besides the surface being gone and radiation all around.
In the Sokovia blast , Sokovia was gone not just the surface. Sokovia was peices of rocks now.
You seen those documentaries on the Discovery channel or Nat Geo about how to deal with city sized asteroids right?
Even if we drill into the asteroid and put in a nuke inside , the asteroid wont blow up to rubble. It will break up into 3-5 medium sized pieces instead of the huge city sized asteroid. The asteroid wont be blown into pieces of rocks with just a nuke.
So the blast that reduced Sokovia to rubble had to be more powerful that a standard nuke. And Thor was right in the middle of the blast.
Get it or are you still confused?
I never said Thor was stronger than the Hulk. Thor is still strong, probably in the same ball park. Even if he is not as strong he is strong enough to rock Hulk with his punches.
Also what does this being Pre-Ragnarok Thor have to do with this? You think Thor is a regular dude if he isnt in lightning god of thunder Thor mode? Or if he has no hammer he is weak?
Pre- Ragnarok Thor survived the blast I noted no problem. Also fought Hulk in the hellcarrier no hammer and was affecting Hulk with his punches and kicks.
The Panthers have no chance of winning. The most they will do is scratch up Thor. This is even if Vibranium cuts Thor at all.
And if they get close enough to scratch Thor they will the punched to death, Tossed, break their necks with a choke hold, or rag-dolled like Hulk did Loki.
__________________
Last edited by Inhuman on Feb 21st, 2018 at 04:29 AM
In Thor Ragnarok, Hela was turning him into a pincushion and he kept on trucking. Even Loki stabbing him with his daggers or gungnir didn't stop him. He has crazy resistance to damage. His blunt/energy force damage is arguably the best in the current Movie Universe.
They are incapable of putting him down. He on the other hand, can one-shot them...
Wouldn't a better fight be "depowered-Thor vs no heart herb Black Panther/Killmonger"?
Thor is still stronger than both of them and even with kinetic energy redirection, Black Panther and Killmonger can only do so much before Thor can take them out.
Then again when everyone in BP had vibranium tech to use against the suits its hard to gauge how raw physical force would do. Also wasn't the rhino wearing vibranium armor too?
KMC Community Forums
Feb 21st, 2018 01:18 AM
