__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
^^ Yup, but it is also consistent with an average travel speed of around Mach 14.5, as the speed won't be totally consistent depending on their surroundings they are moving through. You also have other visual cues, like from 1:45 , where you can see their speed relative to the landmass below them (without even needing to check specific distance, though you can, as you have already proved). To claim that that's 100mph tops is just cringe-worthy.
But of course H1 will apply the complete and utter opposite standard he applies to guys like Miyagi, the Watchmen, Nolanverse characters etc. and used a massively low-balled eye-estimation based on his view of HT's visual speed to judge him.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Last edited by TheVaultDweller on Mar 11th, 2018 at 04:07 AM
I highly doubt he even made any effort to try and do so. Just decided to do his usual thing of massively lowballing the side he is against and expecting no one to question him.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
I believe they exceeded the speed of sound in that particular scene. But their images were large in comparison to the land shown. So the perspective shows that they covered less distance and hence were traveling much slower. But I stand corrected.
When it comes to the supernova I don't think he can do it instantly.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Ok, how fast do you think they were going in that scene?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Why don't you have an idea, you can clearly see how far they travelled on the map.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It’s just h1 trying to come up with something (anything) to muddy up the “showing” so he doesn’t have to accept the values presented.
Everyone here knows that he doesn’t know how or even IF the “perspetive” would affect distances involved (it doesn’t, or has so little bearing in this case that it is irrelevant, as the movement, distance covered and map position is consistent). He is then pushing the debate towards a different direction so he doesn’t have to admit how absoultely dead wrong he was.
Since he's saying that our numbers are wrong, I want him to give an exact number. That way we can fact check it.
Otherwise all he's doing is going "That number hurts my argument, thus I don't accept it".
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's hilarious, really. And, surprise, surprise, (okay, not surprising at all) massively hypocritical. He dismisses numbers drawn from available screen info, where people even show how they reach their answer. Yet he is constantly pulling numbers out of his ass in various threads, and he never provides any proper workings or methods as to how he reaches any of them. He just throws them out and expects people to accept them, and when they don't, he claims his numbers are "common sense" and that they are idiots for disagreeing. And then demand that they prove a negative to his unproven claim. I have seen this happen too many times to count at this point.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
No we don't. Their sprites were large in comparison to the land. That means they traveled less distance than you think. So It could be calculated to near accuracy yes. But it is not pertinent to do so.
So if a character is shown from a perspective to be the size of a city block then you are telling me we can use their visual location in relation to the land as accurate?
My fingertip moves across the sun from my perspective. Does that mean my fingertip actually moved the radius of the sun?
No because from my perspective, my fingertip was larger than normal in comparison to the sun.
SS and HT sprites were large in comparison to the land they traversed. If the unit width of SS sprite is 3ft. Then how many units did SS travel in that scene? That's how you would accurately calculate it.
You do not know exactly how the perspectives demonstrated by object size affects distance traveled (or even the physical laws involved in such phenomena) or even if such is applicable in this case as you do not know how far they are from the ground nor do you know how far the camera is from the objects and the ground, (it certainly isn’t your finger in relation to the sun) so any quantitative claim on your part is speculative and simply a desperate attempt to muddy the “feat” because you are too dishonest to admit that you simply pulled the “100 mph” value out of your butt in yet another lowball attempt but get caught again due to your poor research skills.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 11th, 2018 01:18 AM
