Just because someone says you should defend the left doesn't mean you are extreme.
There are several posters here that have a very hard time trimming down definitions and words because their goal is to be right over having a valid discussion.
In other words, the speculations the SWS makes in the OP is the opposite of what the research shows. They are more inclusive, less racist, more responsible with money, and more forward thinking than previous generations.
When we explore actual research, we see that Baby Boomers like SWS are out of touch with reality and are consuming too much curated news from the tele and Pop-Media sites.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
(please log in to view the image)
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
I don't usually take just one study, I would be interested if you can find a few over a period of years and a metadata Analysis. Otherwise, all we have is an indicator. Add a hyphen between forward and think DDM and perhaps one between much and curated all though that's less obvious.
If he used 'much-curated' in that sentence, it would create a fragmented syntax, as the 'too' would have no purpose. Thus, 'much-curated' would not apply in any way in the context that he was using 'much curated' in. Again:
Example: If I said "They watch too much violent television," it wouldn't make any sense to say instead "They watch too much-violent television."
I trust my own knowledge of grammar and language, as well as my ability to understand the context of the sentence, over a computer program without understanding of context. Would you be able to explain why 'much-curated' could work within the context of the sentence? The only way I could see it working is if the sentence was instead: "Watching too much much-curated news."
I'm not shitting on Grammarly, I've heard that it can be very good, but I can't trust it in this case without an explanation for why a compound word works in place of two separate words in this specific context. The compound word orphans the 'too' before it.
No you wouldn't. You're interested in moving the bar so far in the impossible direction so you can pretend to be right. Someone shit on your troll thread with actual research from two sources. Deal with it like an adult instead of posting about "meta-analyses" which you clearly don't know much about.
You mean two studies on the attitudes and behaviors of Gen Z? Right.
No, then it would be wrong. And it is "ddm", not "DDM" if you wish to abbreviate my nickname.
Nah, much-curated becomes vivid and adds a little humour, it's actually as simple as that it's the second way you can use a hyphen which is why I said it was a choice. It's a throwaway, it's actually as simple as that.
Actually I know a great deal about Meta-analysis, in the same way long ago I taught you about significance in statistics. Which is why I believe you still are butthurt.
Ah, there it is. No longer playing your game with me. Now you go to direct insults. Poor form. You had the option to continue the game but I guess it was too difficult for you.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 9th, 2018 04:40 PM
No different to any other day really Rob.
