The answer would be that a child is no one's "property", though the parent's are responsible for said child's well being and there is precedence where the state can interfere if said parents are doing something harmful to the child's well being and/or quality of life. I hope that clears up your confusion.
Do you think the doctors would be doing the same thing if this was Prince Williams kid? Would the royals be prevented from taking their child to another country for medical treatment?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Would the doctors be willing to do the same thing if it was their own kid?
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
I see one side making a lot of emotional arguments without much of a consistent line of reasoning. i mean, come on - it's really, really easy to point out the logical flaws in Fly Attractor and co.'s case. You guys surely aren't thinking it through very honestly.
__________________ Join the new Star Wars vs. forum: Suspect Insight Forums (not url'd for spam prevention)
That's rarely ever a fair argument, the "what if you...". A person in that position is emotionally compromised and I'd expect any parent to toss aside reason and logic when their child's life is on the line. The doctors' responsible is to put aside emotion and judge from a point of science and facts to the best of thier ability and training.
eg Similar when people use the "what if your loved one was murdered" angle as a means to force a pro capital punishment argument. Obviously I'd probably want to person dead, but I'm emotionally compromised in that situation. The State should make decisions based on logic/reason.
Don't know. Italy sent a chopper to the UK for the kid. The UK responded by posting police near the baby IIRC.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Can't speak for others, but I'm not trying to point out the flaws in anyone's case. I am simply curious if people believe the royals in the UK would receive the same exact treatment. If people think they would be told "No, you can't remove your sick child to get treatment in another country, he has to die".
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
The baby self identifies as a healthy baby and not a sick one.
Boom, nailed it. Now the UK needs to explain why healthy babies can't go to Italy.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 27th, 2018 06:50 PM
