Which of the two radical structures do you prefer, and why? Do you believe both are equally shit?
Discuss.
__________________
They are angry because they have been forced to recognize that their hour has arrived; that the time has come to surrender power to Shimrra and the new order."
I don't know much about "anarchocapitalism". I do know Communism has killed like 100 million people and has never been successful.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
I learned from p*ssies in Antifa communism is awesome cuz it worked in Star Trek. Can't we trust cowards in masks?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I suppose the case for communism over anarchy is that there have been “communist” states that at least functioned, whereas there’s less precedent for a functioning anarchic society
__________________ Join the new Star Wars vs. forum: Suspect Insight Forums (not url'd for spam prevention)
Especially when Star Trek isn't really communist. You can clearly own property lol, but shh don't spoil it for them.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
So you can own buildings, buy land, etc.? Cuz I thought private property didn't exist under Communism.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Apr 29th, 2018 at 10:13 PM
There's no such thing as a communist state. There have been plenty of dictatorships of the proletariats, but communism requires the state to have already been abolished. And no, you can't own something in a communist state. Everything is given from those with ability to those with need. If you don't have a right to something, you can't own it. It's more like the government leasing it to you in return for labor, at least until said government is abolished.
Still curious about how communist states handle private property.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Communism's end goal is also anarchy but I can't see how you'd redistribute according to people's needs without some sort of bureaucracy, which goes right back into statism.
As for Elm's claim that "at least there's examples of communist states", the only examples are the Kropotkin sort of "anarcho-communism" — Makhnovia, Revolutionary Catalonia, etc. — and I guess it's worth noting that they all fell to external threats rather than internal collapse. On the other hand, if you're talking about examples of Marxist communism, there's none.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 29th, 2018 08:31 PM
