quote: (post)

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well it's the one which most damage output. Stopping a 1000T beast plus breaking open it's armor.

If you have a car with a top speed of 150mph and another with 100mph and you race them, yet the 100mph wins, would it be fault of the car or of the driver?

Does it mean the 100mph car is faster, or that the one driving the 150mph one didn't drive it properly?

Just because Kurse had a better outcome in the fight with Thor doesn't mean Hulk who has better quantifiable feats is weaker.

See?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
It is quantifiable, but not necessarily superior.

In a straight line, with factors such as driver skill equalized, it would be extremely unlikely for the slower car to win. And I wasn’t talking about top speed but overall “faster” as there are other variables such as acceleration.

It is not 100% certain, no. But with the comparison I used, it is the most likely conclusion to make. At least it proves that Kurse is not overrated at all.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
But it's quantifiable. A solid evidence and not guessing/speculating.

Okay, so you do realize that external factors do come to play, and that just because you 'win a race' or 'fight' doesn't mean you are stronger.

I agree, you defended your case pretty well.

I wanted to make this thread because i wanted to understand why people see Kurse the way they do.

With this i have a new perspective over the character. Thanks very much for your participation

Nice debate man

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Few proof is absolute proof in a fictional setting. We just make do with the best we get under the circumstances.

Anyway, good talk. Have a nice day, man.