Criteria to consider:
a. How their CGI-design looked overall
b. Level of detail of their CGI
c. How their CGI held up while they were moving and interacting with the environment.
d. How their CGI looked while employing powers and abilities
Doomsday looked like a Ninja Turtle with down syndrome
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ "Your mother was a venereal disease-ridden prostitute who was raped by the father you never knew and killed herself when she saw what an autistic phaggot you are.
So what about my comments made your ass so sore? Was it me calling you a phaggot? I think not." - Nemebro
Last edited by CPT Space Bomb on Jun 12th, 2018 at 09:59 PM
I mean, since I'm guessing DP2 had a smaller budget, the choice to keep Juggs in his yellow jumpsuit with his helmet on was smart: follows the plot well, Juggs' most recognizable feature is his unique helmet, and it hid any issues with having to look at a CGI face for the last half of the film.
JL on the other hand...well, Steppenwolf's face and frame was constantly seen in all it's PlayStation-ness:
- Face shots of Step saying, "Mother," or something like that.
- Full body shots in brightly-lit scenes.
- A bigger PG-13 budget.
What made everyone think, "Yep, that'll do on a film featuring our biggest superheroes ever assembled on the silver screen?" Just straight garbage. Have I mentioned that I really didn't like Justice League?
CPT Space Bomb is right: Abomination looked much better because Louis Letterier and crew knew how to light and shoot the final Harlem showdown to accent all Abom's look's strengths and hide his CGI shortcomings.