KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Thank You, Koch Brothers! (Health Reform)

Thank You, Koch Brothers! (Health Reform)
Started by: Robtard

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (11): « First ... « 8 9 [10] 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
snowdragon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in time

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Then we should implement the Logan Protocal. Sleepshops for anyone 65 and older. We can adjust the age up or down later, depending on need.


eek!

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:30 PM
snowdragon is currently offline Click here to Send snowdragon a Private Message Find more posts by snowdragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
Before I respond: DDM, question. Why does it matter if healthcare costs are skewed towards the elderly? How is that going to change the amount of money spent?


I already explained why and in vivid details. I also cited research to prove this point. We already know people between the age of 5-40 hardly use medical care compared to all other age brackets.

Expanding medicare, etc. coverage is not a simple linear cost per person. People use medical care at different costs by age. Who uses medical care is very heavily weighted towards the high-end of age and a slight uptick during the first 5 years.

Think of it like this:

It's $500 per person to cover the current eligible pool under medicare, etc. plans.

If Medicare for All is implemented, the remaining pool of people will cost, on average, $100 per person because research shows that true costs are 1/5 of the existing medicare pool.

This is ONLY an example and not the actual numbers. The 1/5 number is legit, though: it is the younger than 40 vs. older than 40 crowd.

Expanding to a Medicare for All option is not going to linearly increase costs of medicare per person. You'll be expanding medicare coverage to age brackets that use little to no healthcare and these people make up a plurality of the new pool. This is not to say that costs will be perfectly matched to that trough chart in the study (where there are little costs throughout a person's life between 5 years and 40 years) because there are large administrative costs that do not scale linearly. As far as the actuals, I don't see data on it other than my guessing based on research.


quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
As long as the output stays constant, it doesn't matter what proportion of the population uses the service.


As research shows, it doesn't. When more people have access to healthcare, overall healthcare costs go down because people don't wait for a medical issue to become a catastrophic issue which is much more costly to handle than preventative care. There's a huge laundry list of reasons that affordable preventative care access reduces medical costs.


If France (I'm opening the door up so you can use a strawman), who has a system very comparable to the US system that is already in place, can offer far better healthcare than the US but at a much lower cost than the US, so can we.

Using boogeymen to prevent a UHC or Single Payer option doesn't work anymore.


__________________

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:37 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarthSkywalker0
Heir to the Throne

Gender: Male
Location: United States

This is what I needed to start my response thx.


__________________

"I am beyond prophecy. I forge my own destiny by making the hard choices. Now itís your turn."

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:39 PM
DarthSkywalker0 is currently offline Click here to Send DarthSkywalker0 a Private Message Find more posts by DarthSkywalker0 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
I don't have them however when we start to talk about health reform I would prefer to get away from the analytics because to many math heads will sit there for days coming up different solutions or debunking before any real solutions can be weeded out.

I appreciate your math but the reality is to present solutions (the whys even) then work out the hows after we understand whats needed.

The question is do we need reform, yes. What do we need to provide to make that available, then we figure the costs.

I realize this is an analysis of bernie plan but that is an outlier imo.


I feel your idea (but it didn't work in the way you were presenting) about copays or coinsurance is how we can get there. Have a larger share of costs for the most commonly used services so we see a larger margin of those services shared between the individuals and the healthcare solution (I'm assuming a medicare for all solution with this suggestion).

That should offset some of the costs. I don't think we should run a program like NHS in the UK where almost no out of pocket costs ever happen for the individual. NHS - while often scored as having the best or in the top 3 for medical care, in the world - has cost issues that have plagued them for ages. They were getting things under control since around 2012, however, but I still don't think our economic model should directly match NHS. It should be something closer to what we have now but expanded to a "Medicare for All" options.


__________________

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:41 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
This is what I needed to start my response thx.


Here is what you needed to start your response:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I will make a massive mess of this I will explain, why, later, but this is just a start:

According to this study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/

67% of all healthcare costs occur after 40. 35% of that comes from those 65-84.


Only 19.5% of all healthcare costs occur at younger than 40.

65% of of Americans are 44 or younger.



Do you see the math adding up?


Let's go ahead and pretend that 44=40 even though this comparison does not favor my point.





So 80% of healthcare costs occur after 44 and 65% of the population is younger than 44.




325,000,000 people


211,250,000 younger than 44. Current costs for the government (includes more than medicare): $11 trillion


211,250,000 is 1.85 times the size of the 44 and older population. But that population will only use 1/5 of their medical costs, per person.


To put the proportions in order: is 1.8 > 5 (44 and over use 5 times the costs as younger than 44).



So we don't even need to get into the numbers since the proportions are not even close.


But I can come up with something....


$19.8 trillion





That's my rough estimate on how much it would cost in 2019 if the plan is implemented as presented. That purely based on medical care utilization by age bracket and it is a rough order of magnitude estimate that does not have any nuance. It would probably fluctuate by 1-2 trillion if I added nuance.


__________________

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:44 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
snowdragon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in time

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I feel your idea (but it didn't work in the way you were presenting) about copays or coinsurance is how we can get there. Have a larger share of costs for the most commonly used services so we see a larger margin of those services shared between the individuals and the healthcare solution (I'm assuming a medicare for all solution with this suggestion).

That should offset some of the costs. I don't think we should run a program like NHS in the UK where almost no out of pocket costs ever happen for the individual. NHS - while often scored as having the best or in the top 3 for medical care, in the world - has cost issues that have plagued them for ages. They were getting things under control since around 2012, however, but I still don't think our economic model should directly match NHS. It should be something closer to what we have now but expanded to a "Medicare for All" options.


I can't speak for every state but many medicare services still have a nominal OOP fee associated with them.

We could stick to a traditional 80/20 coinsurance plan with a max oop of something like 2k for an individual, 6k for a family and dial out the details when it comes to out patient/in patient services and emergency rooms. With a 10$ doctor office copay and 20 for a specialist and deal with the perscription list because many brands have generic and are covered under most drug distributers.

There should still be the option of private healthcare and we should allow the purchase of insurance across state lines as well as collective purchase arrangements between bussinesses that want to access private insurance.

Yeah and let's get rid of this in network out of network garbage as well.

Last edited by snowdragon on Sep 11th, 2018 at 07:59 PM

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 07:54 PM
snowdragon is currently offline Click here to Send snowdragon a Private Message Find more posts by snowdragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
I can't speak for every state but many medicare services still have a nominal OOP fee associated with them.

We could stick to a traditional 80/20 coinsurance plan with a max oop of something like 2k for an individual, 6k for a family and dial out the details when it comes to out patient/in patient services and emergency rooms. With a 10$ doctor office copay and 20 for a specialist and deal with the perscription list because many brands have generic and are covered under most drug distributers.

There should still be the option of private healthcare and we should allow the purchase of insurance across state lines as well as collective purchase arrangements between bussinesses that want to access private insurance.


I really like this idea. And then offer what is called a Medicare Supplement plan for those that want insurance for that remaining 20%. That's the American way: let Americans buy what they feel is best for their needs.


The government should offer a minimum. An 80/20 split is a good place to start.

France has a similar system. But they use copays. They have a copay schedule. Some of the more common services have a higher marginal copay cost to the total medical service cost like I was talking about, before. That helps keep the cost for France's universal option, down.



Here's what I think we can do: start with your idea. Maintain that for 3 years. And then adjust after collecting good data. But the plan would have to run for 5 years with the last 2 years being time to debate and put in an adjusted plan.


So, start with your idea in...2020? Then run it just like that through 2025. Then use the data from the first 3 years to draft an adjusted plan that goes into law 2025. Make the law finalization in 2024 to give Americans and the market place time to adjust.

At this point, I think talking about options beyond your suggestion is too nebulous and too much guesswork. We need damn good data. America is different than the UK or Germany.

We are similar to France, sure, but they have a "Medicare for All" solution with a dynamic copay schedule...that won't match up with America very well.

And it will take a while for costing regulations to make a true impact on the market (such as expanded durable medical equipment schedules and Usual and Customary fee schedules for common acute healthcare services).


__________________

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 08:03 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
snowdragon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in time

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I really like this idea. And then offer what is called a Medicare Supplement plan for those that want insurance for that remaining 20%. That's the American way: let Americans buy what they feel is best for their needs.


The government should offer a minimum. An 80/20 split is a good place to start.

France has a similar system. But they use copays. They have a copay schedule. Some of the more common services have a higher marginal copay cost to the total medical service cost like I was talking about, before. That helps keep the cost for France's universal option, down.



Here's what I think we can do: start with your idea. Maintain that for 3 years. And then adjust after collecting good data. But the plan would have to run for 5 years with the last 2 years being time to debate and put in an adjusted plan.


So, start with your idea in...2020? Then run it just like that through 2025. Then use the data from the first 3 years to draft an adjusted plan that goes into law 2025. Make the law finalization in 2024 to give Americans and the market place time to adjust.

At this point, I think talking about options beyond your suggestion is too nebulous and too much guesswork. We need damn good data. America is different than the UK or Germany.

We are similar to France, sure, but they have a "Medicare for All" solution with a dynamic copay schedule...that won't match up with America very well.

And it will take a while for costing regulations to make a true impact on the market (such as expanded durable medical equipment schedules and Usual and Customary fee schedules for common acute healthcare services).


I guess we can wait for head shakers or the folks that will avoid this.

When you put a plan in place 3-5 years is a minimum time required to gather actuarial data for future outlays even then that makes many nervous.

Ok DDM submit all your hardwork and proposals to your congressperson and make it happen.

Old Post Sep 11th, 2018 08:10 PM
snowdragon is currently offline Click here to Send snowdragon a Private Message Find more posts by snowdragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarthPlaguis12
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States

This thread is utter bs and the OP is a moron

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 07:05 PM
DarthPlaguis12 is online now! Click here to Send DarthPlaguis12 a Private Message Find more posts by DarthPlaguis12 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12
This thread is utter bs and the OP is a moron


You're a nicer but far less funny version of the troll PVS. So you've got that going for you, which is nice.


__________________

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 07:14 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
KMC's #1 Top Rated Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12
This thread is utter bs and the OP is a moron


Bernie Sanders is FAR smarter than you and he's probably on some level of senility considering his age, EvenMoreRetardedTI.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 07:26 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Flyattractor
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: B.F.K

If Bernie is So Smart why aint He president?

Heck...why couldn't He even get the DNC Prez Nomination?


__________________
Banned 30 days for the Crime of "ETC"... and when I "ETC" I do it HARD!!!
Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 07:39 PM
Flyattractor is currently offline Click here to Send Flyattractor a Private Message Find more posts by Flyattractor Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Flyattractor
If Bernie is So Smart why aint He president?

Heck...why couldn't He even get the DNC Prez Nomination?


Great question. He should be, actually. DNC had other ideas due to corruption because the Democrats are corrupt corporatists.

But, hey, so is the GOP. smile


__________________

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 07:45 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Flyattractor
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: B.F.K

So Bernie isn't really that smart then?!

Gotchya.

And yes. I agree. The GOP is Corrupt, but they are Pure Amatures when compared to the levels of Degradging Out Right Criminal Corruption of the DNC.

smile


__________________
Banned 30 days for the Crime of "ETC"... and when I "ETC" I do it HARD!!!
Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance

Old Post Sep 12th, 2018 08:09 PM
Flyattractor is currently offline Click here to Send Flyattractor a Private Message Find more posts by Flyattractor Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Eternal Idol
Lono, "The Dog"

Gender: Male
Location: Colorado

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
You're a nicer but far less funny version of the troll PVS. So you've got that going for you, which is nice.

PVS was ****ing hilarious.


__________________

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 06:12 AM
Eternal Idol is currently offline Click here to Send Eternal Idol a Private Message Find more posts by Eternal Idol Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
PVS was ****ing hilarious.


He's still with us. He's Bashar Teg.


__________________

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 02:25 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Eternal Idol
Lono, "The Dog"

Gender: Male
Location: Colorado

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
He's still with us. He's Bashar Teg.

Yeah, but as PVS, he was a force of nature...a relentless troll who not only made trolling an art form, but also made it a way of life. He was like troll-Jesus, making everyone's day better by just doing what he did. He doesn't seem to have the time or motivation now, perhaps due to the slower traffic and slim pickings left on KMC.

Maybe I'm just looking back at KMC with rose-tinted glasses? I just remember cracking up reading a couple of his posts and I really liked his memorable Carl avatar.

(please log in to view the image)


__________________

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 07:41 PM
Eternal Idol is currently offline Click here to Send Eternal Idol a Private Message Find more posts by Eternal Idol Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Flyattractor
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: B.F.K

Oh you are way past Rose Colored Glasses my friend.


__________________
Banned 30 days for the Crime of "ETC"... and when I "ETC" I do it HARD!!!
Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance Happy Dance

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 07:43 PM
Flyattractor is currently offline Click here to Send Flyattractor a Private Message Find more posts by Flyattractor Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Eternal Idol
Lono, "The Dog"

Gender: Male
Location: Colorado

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Flyattractor
Oh you are way past Rose Colored Glasses my friend.


lol. I guess I'm unfairly comparing KMC now to KMC in its prime.

I'm more active as a poster now than I ever was before, and back then, I was only interested in posting in the Comic Vs forum. I did read the GDF a lot though. Lots of great posters have been lost to us since.


__________________

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 07:49 PM
Eternal Idol is currently offline Click here to Send Eternal Idol a Private Message Find more posts by Eternal Idol Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Yeah, but as PVS, he was a force of nature...a relentless troll who not only made trolling an art form, but also made it a way of life. He was like troll-Jesus, making everyone's day better by just doing what he did. He doesn't seem to have the time or motivation now, perhaps due to the slower traffic and slim pickings left on KMC.


Actually, it's because we broke him. He wrote up a long essay about it. Rogue Jedi and I ruined KMC for him. We kind of ruined most of those troll games he would play.


__________________

Old Post Sep 13th, 2018 08:02 PM
dadudemon is online now! Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 02:29 AM.
Pages (11): « First ... « 8 9 [10] 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Thank You, Koch Brothers! (Health Reform)

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.