You wanna tell me that 87 women are all lying just to get a bit of money out of the guy, or because they're petty? That's just grasping at straws.
The NYPD has already noted a few times that they accumulated quite a bit of evidence that prove Harvey performed sexual misconduct and blackmail. Now most of the evidence isn't released to the public, and that's understandable.
It wouldn't be all that hard to find a few hundred people on the internet that would be willing to accuse you of being a pedo, does that mean you're a pedo?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
What is what based on? and how exactly is it a "false equivalent "?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Your point about a hundred people calling me a pedo. Like, how did you get to that arbitrary conclusion?
And it's a false equivalent because getting a hundred random people -- many of whom likely don't even know me -- to make a claim on the internet isn't the same as dozens of women who've worked closely with Harvey and who Weinstein has continuelly tried to get to shut up over the years.
The point of the example was to illustrate surtur's point about the number of accusers not being proof in itself, but I guess the concept was just too complicated for you to understand.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I wanna tell you that accusations aren't evidence.
And if the NYPD has noted they have accumulated a bunch of evidence I don't even see why you're trying to argue about the accusations. Since we shouldn't toss someone in jail for the rest of their life based on nothing but accusations.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Aug 8th, 2018 at 01:04 PM
Considering that I was responding to someone that said they'd be ok with sending someone to jail based solely on the number of accusers, IE no proof or evidence needed.
Yes.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You're comparing random people on the internet making accusations as being the same with the people whom have accused Weinstein, people he personally knew, where in the industry and worked with for the most part.
Your comparison is faulty, silly and rather stupid. No wonder MythLord mocked you.
Whether they know the person or not, accusations without proof should never be enough to send someone to jail.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
While I believe Harvey is guilty; unlike MythLord, I think proof should be required before sending people to jail.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Also, I'd wager several people testifying against him would be considered pretty nice evidence, as well. It's not all an agenda about "them filthy whores wantin' money!".
The number of people testifying isn't evidence in itself, they have to actually provide information that can be proven.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 8th, 2018 02:49 AM
