__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Either you don't understand my post or your trolling, which is it?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You didn't backup your claim therefore it's being ignored.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
The thing you are mentioning had more validity back in 2012 when Thor's only other appearance besides Avengers was in 1 movie(for half of which he was powerless). He has way more feats since then, 2 more solo movies and 2 more Avengers movies.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
No, you made the original claim that means the burden of proof is on you.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
One of his go-to MO's is to hassle the other side to provide proof (while he sits back and does nothing close to the same effort to prove his assertions as he will simply use his opinions or manufactured math as some sort of self-proclaimed indisputable proof.).
Then if you take the time to do so, he either hand-waves the evidence away or downright ignores it or he manufactures an entirely arbitrary criteria to create ambiguity on the evidence. Or he simply moves the goalposts, re-word his assertions and ask for more proof or abandon his assertions entirely and make and make up even more garbage he will proclaim as truth unless more evidence is provided and the cycle continues. He has quite the repertoire of evidence avoidance built up from 10 years of trolling experience it looks like.
He can do this because he doesn't care if he is right, doesn't care if he is able to convince anyone and doesn't care about the truth or his credibility. He would rather be seen as the town idiot and be used as a punching bag in debates over and over for as long as he doesn't have to accept that Thor > Superman.
His purpose is to lowball and to troll. He cannot properly achieve the former so he will just continue to do the latter.
He is a waste of time for everyone involved.
Edit. Of course, mocking him and counter trolling him is fine and dandy as a use of time as we are all enjoying the laughs he provides us.
Last edited by Nibedicus on Sep 20th, 2018 at 03:23 AM
Seriously though.
It was made clear that Thor could be damaged from those bullets.
And you guys are spouting opinions about certain showings proving Thor is resistant to the most powerful bullets. Use some form of proof (science, math, etc). Otherwise it's just your opinion.
post this so-called proof that shows bullets can penetrate 3 in thick titanium.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Everyone here accepts the evidence. As it is obvious that massive explosions (and being in ground zero of one) are far more destructive than aircraft bullets. Where a missile with under 150kg warhead (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-65_Maverick) can actually take out a Heavy Battle Tank while an A-10 would need to hit it in either treads or it's engine to score a kill.
Real world facts > you.
We just don't use fake math pseudo science pretend knowledge.
You were talking about me.
Getting hit with a missile =/= being in just any explosion.
Just ask yourself, did any of the explosions that Thor was punch a hole or break a 3in slab of titanium? If so then prove it.
Yes, I was mocking you. That was not debating because I wasn't debating against him. Try and keep up.
That is the dumbest, most arbitrary proof requirement I have ever encountered. Basically:
Predictable. No, I feel that my logic that a 150kg explosive attached to a guidance system+propulsion > 30mm shells is sufficient to convince everyone here. Til a non-troll questions it, I have no need to produce any more evidence to a known-troll.
Fact: A-10s use their AGM-65 missiles against Heavy Battle Tanks because their main 30mm cannon isn't as effective/guaranteed to score a kill on hit (even after a full strafe). Because missiles are far more effective. A simple google search will lead everyone to the same information needed if they feel the need for clarification.
It is literally your logic that -> running away from it = writer's intent that it can hurt him.
I literally just proved how wrong your logic is. If you can't get why, then you're either a liar or a moron. Thanks for playing.
Last edited by Nibedicus on Sep 20th, 2018 at 07:33 PM
What it did is besides the point. Thor also stood in the line of fire with nothing happening. Point is Superman CLEARLY evaded the bullets being hit once.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 19th, 2018 02:21 PM
