__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It really is terrifying that a growing percentage of the population thinks this way. This is how cold wars turn hot.
Racists are not evil. Most people who have racist tendencies are just everyday people, with some flawed preconceived notions, based on teachings passed down from their parents or from poor/limited experiences. They aren’t goddamn Nazi’s.
The Klansmen wanting to lynch a black boy in Mississippi are evil, and racist but not Nazi’s imo. The old white dude who’s a relatively good guy but doesn’t want his granddaughters dating a coloured boy and therefore he misses the wedding isn’t evil but racist. The stormtrooper willing to systematically erase a group of people from the face of the earth with the procession of a manufacturing plant is evil, a Nazi and racist.
Shit, there were probably some Nazi’s who weren’t even racist, but believed their country was in peril, and they did horrible shit. They should still be tried for their crimes, but my point is there are nuances to this shit.
You can’t just say racist = evil, and Nazi = evil, therefore racist = Nazi. Especially since the bar for racism is not defined clearly, and it’s a shifting standard. I’m 100% considered racist by some standards at this point despite being multiracial. Am I evil? You probably think so.
Out of curiosity? Do you consider only white capable of racism? I want to understand your viewpoint. A lot of people in the West who have very few traveling experience think so. It’s hardly the case, I’ve been to 25 countries and spent a majority of my life outside of NA. Racism is more rampant in multicultural 3rd world countries then it is here. How much of the global population would be willing to consider evil?
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Again ****, you can’t just assume someone is a secret racist, you have to have evidence to accuse someone of something.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Eh it’s more of a loose statement. I’m sick of the view that because some people are secret racists a lot of people now have to defend themselves against unproven allegations of racism.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Also the censored word is an F-bomb.
Like me saying “F uck” out of exasperation, not a name call
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Yes and no. Most of the time someone is called a "secret racist" is because they've given cause for people to believe they're racist or at least bigoted towards a group(s). eg reoccurring subdued but still bigoted comments and beliefs.
edit: I didn't take that as an insult, I got the meaning of frustration
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
It takes more than an opposition to intersectional social justice and opposition to illegal immigration to actually demonstrate subdued bigotry though.
You can argue against intersectional social justice and accompanying affirmative action and diversity quotas off of white supremacist beliefs, but you can also do this out of individualist beliefs that are antithetical to white supremacy.
You can argue against mass immigration off of the basis of wanting an ethnostate, but you can also do so from a principle of national interest and economic protectionism in a way that contains no racial lens.
You can argue for the greatness of western civilization on a basis that has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture and values.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
What I'm talking about is say someone who has a penchant on looking unfavorably on a group or groups of peopple. eg say Black people. Where they'll more harshly judge a negative story if the perpetrator happens to be Black. Granted, while that's not the same as chanting "Go back to Africa!" like some inbred member of the KKK, it's still racism/bigotry, just not blatantly on the surface.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
There are people like that who I condemn, and then there are people who do the same thing just with white people, and are lauded as anti racist for it.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"