At their best? I thought you were of the belief that we should go by averages, was that a lie?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Just trying to understand your standards as you can't really have an honest debate if everyone is using different standards/rules.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's not clear, because we don't know what you mean by at their best. your definitions have a tendency to change when it suits you.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
that, SILENT, also APPLIES TO YOU (we can all cite examples of that), and to almost everyone on this forum. we are not robots that must follow a certain patern of order, heed their programing and never deviate from the the way they're meant to act.
so as h1 said let the thread move on
Give me some examples of my definitions/standards changing.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
2. Best we can extrapolate from their on-screen feats
3. Best we think the writer intented for them to operate at.
Etc etc etc
He has many different definitions, depending on what he thinks will help whatever side he's currently arguing for. it's why I try and nail down exactly what he means these days.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Tbh, I don't really know who wins here. I was watching Star Wars and remembered how formidable Dooku was. So I thought about who would be an interesting match for him. That's why I created the thread.
I guess it's hard to tell who wins here.
Anyway, if someone can think of a better match for Dooku (no clear cut winner and no other force user) then post it here.
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
I think it is a fairly good match. Dooku is a glass cannon compared to her though. If she gets one hit in, I highly doubt he will survive it. If she had ever been hit with HV we could make an assumption about how a lightsaber would fare against her.
I think WW can edge him out possibly bit I'm definitely open to change my mind on this one.