Congress can't do its job of checks and balances without the report and Barr's already hinted that if a subpoena goes out for it, it will be redacted to to uselessness.
For almost 2years Trumpers said the report needed to be released in full. Now it's "we don't need to see it." Too funny, but 100% expected.
Er, can you explain why congress wouldn't just stick to partisan lines? The dems will think he obstructed and the republicans won't. Who then decides who is more correct?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
If a hate crime had been committed and the cops caught those involved, would the prosecutor have dropped the charges? And yes: faking one is just as bad as committing one.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
I don't know what kind of embarrassing things could be in it. I agree they should release the reason Mueller determined he didn't collude. As well as the reason he punted when it comes to obstruction. As well as info on any other crimes. Why do you need more than that?
Though there were investigations into Hillary, I suppose if every single scrap of information when it came to that investigation was released it would be a different story when it comes to Trump. Is that what happened?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I realize you don't know, I'm asking in your opinion what embarrassing details do you think might/could be in there? This is your opinion.
I mostly agree with you there, as at least it shows some small level of transparency But for almost two years it was pushed that the full report needed to be shown to the public, I agreed every time, no matter how it falls, show it all, so let's have it. Full transparency.
I've said before when Clinton was cleared of Benghazi, then investigated again that the Republicans doing the investigation should release all their findings.
Who knows? Let's say they tried to look into the pee pee tape and found no evidence, but did find evidence Trump went to hookers. Should that be made public?
I always said I wanted the evidence if Mueller came back with guilty. Now I say we need to see why he said innocent and why he punted.
"Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) blocked a resolution calling for special counsel Robert Mueller's report to be made public, arguing that Congress should also call for the release of communications and testimony from Obama-era officials."
If the logic is that the Trump admin do not want the full report released due to fear of something being found, wouldn't that logic also apply to why the Dems refused this?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
In actuality the tracks for divisiveness that have been laid down are just what the Russians really want, less trust in our leaders, more fighting to erode our Democracy.....those evil geniuses!
Last edited by snowdragon on Mar 28th, 2019 at 07:24 PM
Personal info that has no connection to the investigation and is not criminal like Trump getting pissed on should be redacted, or in the very least not shown to the public.
On the surface it's a reasonable demand, but it also smells fishy, kinda/maybe like a red herring, when "release the report" was all the rave until the day Mueller turned it in and said "no collusion". If Rand had made this request prior to Mueller's report being turned in, it would seem more non-partisan and legit. It really looks like a defense play more than anything else.
But sure, do that, unless the opposition has both valid and legitimate reasons to counter Rand's demand.
I can't see what valid reasons would apply to one but not the other.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday to expunge his criminal record and it was delayed lol.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I thought the opinions of celebrities were even more worthless than those of prosecutors. I guess it all depends on who's framing the argument
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
A link to the opinion was posted it's not like someone printed out the article and framed it. Quit melting down.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 28th, 2019 05:32 PM
But for almost two years it was pushed that the full report needed to be shown to the public, I agreed every time, no matter how it falls, show it all, so let's have it. Full transparency.
