So you still cannot post any evidence but instead back a no limits fallacy which is one of your own rules backed by your own bias. As I said post a greater feat not your opinion of who wins.
So now the guy who posts evidence while you cannot call me a troll. Oh the irony. I get it you think a certain way based off your own mind not feats. Leave your own bias out of this. I posted my feat now do the same or bend the knee.
Demanding that one proves the non-existence of something in place for providing adequate evidence for the ... test that proves the existence and presence of a ghost, so no way to prove the negative or the non-existence.
If we debated like you it would be a free for all based on no feats just beliefs.
Morgan warped reality on a whim on multiple occassion, lassoing the moon? C'mon, anything Thanos can do with great effort or movement Bruce can do nonchalantly and instantaneously.
The IG is powerful but the user did throw a moon at a bunch of streets and fail to injure a single one. That's.....terrible.
Killing half the universe is greater than any feat you can name. Thanos broke up the moon which kod Iron Man. He did not use all the stones to even hurl the moon and its capabilities when used in totality is universal in scale. Thanos wins just as did he with a snap. Better feats, better combat reflexes, tougher opposition in his universe all which makes this a landslide in the MCUs favor.
Quan the snap would only work on beings in the MCU.
You have to prove whether it would work on higher level beings.
Remember the power level is determined from the feat, not from speculation.