You claimed that the Thanos situation is different because the items he had at his disposal could have allowed him to save everyone by creating infinite resources but he is a villain because he chose instead to kill half the universe so they don't destroy themselves by overpopulation and using up the existing resources.
Killmonger could have used the Wakanda tech he acquired to "empower the disenfranchised" without killing people around the world. He chose to kill people to do it.
Thus he made the exact same moral choice as Thanos. Who you agree is a villain.
__________________ Sweating on the streets of Woking
You must not live on earth. The powers that be are not simply going to allow that. Whereas thanos using magical stones, nothing anyone could do about it.
Killmonger is absolutely a villain. You can't say any different. He had revolutionary ideals that could have changed the world, but he also wanted to punish that world and a loooooot of innocents. He. Was. A. Villain.
. Stuff that didn’t happen? Lol. You just compared thanos having literal omnipotence to killmonger willingness to empower people with weapons and tech. BP decided to open his borders and buying some buildings will not come to fruition the way you think it would for the simple fact that song and dance has in fact happen before
Nobody should. It's not only disrespectful to his legacy, it just doesn't make sense when a canon replacement in Shuri has been there for years already.
I think giving Shuri the reigns for BP2 and seeing how it goes is the best option for them. If it goes well and the movie/character does well then that’ll be that. If not they can always recast T’Challa for BP3 and will have bought themselves a lot of time. By then people will probably be less sensitive to the idea as BP3 probably won’t be out for like 7 years.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 21st, 2020 04:56 AM
