KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Owen feat vs Mxy feat

Owen feat vs Mxy feat
Started by: deft

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
@jl

The feat Mxy did here was him being amped, WHICH IS PART of the discussion

I'm not sure how's that comparable

The thread isn't "Mxy vs Molecule Man"

It's "which comparison is better", and Molecule Man's is better because he wasn't amped when he did that

READ


It also depends on if Owen's feat was a representation only.

What's more impressive, a roided up amped Tyson beating Evander Holyfield, or me beating him in a videogame?


__________________

Old Post Oct 14th, 2019 08:59 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AlbertoJohnAvil
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location:

Account Restricted

No..it actually wasn't... I already addressed abhi on that

Old Post Oct 14th, 2019 09:02 PM
AlbertoJohnAvil is currently offline Click here to Send AlbertoJohnAvil a Private Message Find more posts by AlbertoJohnAvil Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
xJLxKing
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
@jl

The feat Mxy did here was him being amped, WHICH IS PART of the discussion

I'm not sure how's that comparable

The thread isn't "Mxy vs Molecule Man"

It's "which comparison is better", and Molecule Man's is better because he wasn't amped when he did that

READ

Again!

What part don’t you understand

The OP of thread asked which feat is better. He didn’t asked why X or Y feat are better. If I asked you which feat was better, Superman KOing WF or Thing KOing Hulk. I’m not asking you why one feat was achievable. Im just asking which is better

There is no need to put layers of depth in a very simple question.
You are trying to make a discussion for no reason


__________________

Old Post Oct 14th, 2019 09:09 PM
xJLxKing is currently offline Click here to Send xJLxKing a Private Message Find more posts by xJLxKing Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AlbertoJohnAvil
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location:

Account Restricted

Molecule Man put the entire multiverse in a shoebox...

A DAMN SHOEBOX.

That's like Lucifer Morningstar levels, or arguably above

Old Post Oct 14th, 2019 09:13 PM
AlbertoJohnAvil is currently offline Click here to Send AlbertoJohnAvil a Private Message Find more posts by AlbertoJohnAvil Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Diesldude
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Pumping iron at the gym.

Mxy's feat is better.

Old Post Oct 14th, 2019 09:28 PM
Diesldude is currently offline Click here to Send Diesldude a Private Message Find more posts by Diesldude Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
SquallX
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: miami/fl.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Mxy did a one time feat. It never happened again, and it wasn't meant to be taken seriously, it was comedic, the writer blatantly said this. It's also not consistent with his general portrayal. Hence outlier

He gets beaten by less. I go by the average, I don't go by one time big feats, by that logic Spidey is planetary since he beat Firelord that one time


And how many multiversal feats does Owen have under his belt again?

You do know Mxy is by nature a comedic character right? It’s even made more clear when Mxy interacted with the Looney Toons for god sakes.

I love how Mxy destroying the Omniverse is not consistent, but Owen showing the multiverse in a box is.

Mxy has never been beaten when he tries, unless you count Prime. Anytime Mxy loses, there’s a specific reasons why. Hell, most of his lost to Clark is because he allows them to happen.

While where on the subject, how many times has Owen lose again?

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:45 AM
SquallX is currently offline Click here to Send SquallX a Private Message Find more posts by SquallX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sin I AM
Madame Mort

Gender: Female
Location: Poppin Pills on the Rainbow Bridge

quote: (post)
Originally posted by MrMind
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...mp;pagenumber=3

it's been argued way too many times and this is just one of the thread at this point no one has the energy to repeat themselves
it's better if you look for those threads rather than just asking for handout


Oh...so no proof? Got it


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 01:09 AM
Sin I AM is currently offline Click here to Send Sin I AM a Private Message Find more posts by Sin I AM Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
abhilegend
Prince of All Saiyans

Gender: Male
Location: Always second place

quote: (post)
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
No..it actually wasn't... I already addressed abhi on that

Where did you do that?


__________________


Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 06:53 AM
abhilegend is currently offline Click here to Send abhilegend a Private Message Find more posts by abhilegend Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
MrMind
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Scatman

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Sin I AM
Oh...so no proof? Got it


You are full cringe.


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 06:58 AM
MrMind is currently offline Click here to Send MrMind a Private Message Find more posts by MrMind Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
LordGod
The One

Gender: Male
Location: Silver City

God Alberto is an idiot.


Anyway, the QUESTION here is which FEAT is better. At the very least the Owen scene is AMBIGUOUS. That entire comic was one giant metaphor, so why in the hell would we take the multiverse in a box thing literally, when the context of the issue heavily suggests the opposite?

On the other hand, the Mxy scene is NOT ambiguous. That WAS the ACTUAL multiverse. Unquestionably.

Again- one of those showings is an ACTUAL feat. The other more than likely isn't. Hence Mxy's FEAT is better because we know for sure that it's the REAL multiverse.


__________________

Last edited by LordGod on Oct 15th, 2019 at 12:28 PM

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:22 PM
LordGod is currently offline Click here to Send LordGod a Private Message Find more posts by LordGod Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
-K-M-
...........

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

Well it’s highly unlikely the MM scene is meant to be valid. When it first came out I took it literal, but seeing MM’s showings and statements since they have put him more universal in power.

So I do believe it was meant as a metaphor but I could be wrong


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:27 PM
-K-M- is currently offline Click here to Send -K-M- a Private Message Find more posts by -K-M- Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by -K-M-
Well it’s highly unlikely the MM scene is meant to be valid. When it first came out I took it literal, but seeing MM’s showings and statements since they have put him more universal in power.

So I do believe it was meant as a metaphor but I could be wrong


Probably wrong, tbh thumb up


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:28 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
-K-M-
...........

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Probably wrong, tbh thumb up


(please log in to view the image)


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:36 PM
-K-M- is currently offline Click here to Send -K-M- a Private Message Find more posts by -K-M- Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

Yeah...

In hindsight, I definitely think that the "multiverse in a box" scene was intended to be a primarily metaphorical, visual representation of the Marvel multiverse -- not an actual multiverse that Owen randomly put in a shoebox.

Owen was simplifying Schrodinger's thought experiment to Lifebringer, which revolves around the principal of quantum possibilities -- hence his initial 'cat in the box' analogy(look it up, it's an actual thing.)

That being said, the takeaway of the thought experiment is ultimately: "Whatever you may think you know, you don't really know what's in the box until you open it up and look inside" -- and that's what Owen was conveying to Lifebringer there with his visual representation of the multiverse. It was his way of explaining that much of what used to be in the previous creation, still was.

I mean, the whole issue was full of metaphors. It also started and ended with the myth of Sisyphus and the impossible task, for example:
https://i.imgur.com/W3e6B4U.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kvjrnrj.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8QA8K1I.jpg


With that in mind, Owen begins explaining the human thought experiment to Lifebringer, using Schrodinger's 'cat in a box' paradox as an analogy. However, he then shifts their discussion to the current state of the multiverse using the same basic analogy: that everything isn't necessarily as it seems -- there could be anything inside the box('box' being a metaphor for the new/unsolidified Marvel multiverse that was in a state of flux at the time.)

And like I said above: the entire scene was packed with metaphors. That was Owen's way of explaining the current state of the multiverse to Lifebringer, without being overly explicit:
(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)


The 'multiverse in a box' seemed to have been intended as a purely visual aid that Owen used to help Lifebringer see the bigger picture. All context considered, we are really never led to believe that he placed an actual/full-scale multiverse inside a shoebox for the lulz, just to randomly show it off like that... Imo, it's akin to the visual representation of a universe that Franklin whipped-up for Galactus here:

(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)

________________


As for Owen himself: he was definitely intended to be quite powerful under Ewing -- above Lifebringer, for sure... But also keep in mind that Marvel's entire cosmology was brand new(and extremely unstable) during The Ultimates, and as a result, things were able to happen that wouldn't normally be possible in a fully 'solidified' cosmos. This fact was repeatedly stated/shown on panel:
https://i.imgur.com/SXTFvjw.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/9H5MVsE.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/z41t60e.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/7XIyxY7.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/BWEhZI1.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/mWgYW1S.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/utUBIOp.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/WILIfsh.jpg

So it's really hard to accurately gauge *any* power-levels from that series... Especially where the cosmic beings are concerned.

After all, Owen certainly didn't appear to be kept at those same, upper-echelon levels in his more recent appearances. That's for sure.


__________________


"I am tired of Earth. These people.
I am tired of being caught in the tangle of their lives."

Last edited by Galan007 on Oct 16th, 2019 at 09:31 PM

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 12:55 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
Yeah...

In hindsight, I definitely think that the "multiverse in a box" scene was intended to be a primarily metaphorical, visual representation of the Marvel multiverse -- not an actual multiverse that Owen randomly put in a shoebox.

Owen was simplifying Schrodinger's Thought Experiment to Lifebringer, which revolves around the principal of quantum possibilities -- hence his initial 'cat in the box' analogy(look it up, it's an actual thing.)

However, the takeaway of the thought experiment is ultimately: "Whatever you may think you know, you don't really know what's in the box until you open it up and look inside" -- and that's what Owen was conveying to Lifebringer there with his visual representation of the multiverse. It was his way of explaining that much of what used to be in the previous creation, still was.

Tbh, the whole issue was full of metaphors. It also started and ended with the myth of Sisyphus and the impossible task, for example.


As mentioned: Owen begins explaining the human thought experiment to Lifebringer, using Schrodinger's 'cat in a box' paradox as an analogy. However, he then shifts their discussion to the current state of the multiverse using the same basic analogy: that everything isn't necessarily as it seems -- there could be anything inside the box('box' being a metaphor for the unsolidified Marvel multiverse that was in a state of flux at the time.)

And like I said above, the entire scene was packed with different metaphors and whatnot... Which was Owen's way of explaining the current state of the multiverse to Lifebringer, without being overly explicit:
(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)


The 'multiverse in a box' thing was purely a visual aid that Owen used to help Lifebringer see the bigger picture. All context considered, we are really never led to believe that he placed an actual/full-scale multiverse inside a shoebox for the lulz, just to randomly show it off like that... Imo, it's akin to the visual representation of a universe that Franklin whipped-up for Galactus here:

(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)

________________


As for Owen himself: he was definitely intended to be quite powerful under Ewing -- vastly above Lifebringer, for sure... But also keep in mind that the entire cosmic hierarchy was in a state of flux at the time, and things were able to happen then that wouldn't normally be possible in a 'solidified' cosmology(like Order&Chaos killing LT, for example.) So it's really hard to accurately gauge power-levels from that particular series, imo.

Owen certainly didn't appear to be kept at those same upper-echelon levels in his most recent appearances, though... That's for damn sure.


thumb down


__________________

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 01:02 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

thumb up


__________________


"I am tired of Earth. These people.
I am tired of being caught in the tangle of their lives."

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 01:24 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Wonder Man
Most Powerful Avenger

Gender: Male
Location: United States Lake Ontario, NY

Well I missed a lot in marvel but I know that Beyonder/Owen/Mephisto can alter the characteristics of anything. I believe that is what Owen was explaining to Galactus.


__________________


Ion: Sub-Atomic Power

Old Post Oct 15th, 2019 11:07 PM
Wonder Man is currently offline Click here to Send Wonder Man a Private Message Find more posts by Wonder Man Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
LordGod
The One

Gender: Male
Location: Silver City

quote: (post)
Originally posted by MrMind
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...mp;pagenumber=3

it's been argued way too many times and this is just one of the thread at this point no one has the energy to repeat themselves
it's better if you look for those threads rather than just asking for handout
quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
Yeah...

In hindsight, I definitely think that the "multiverse in a box" scene was intended to be a primarily metaphorical, visual representation of the Marvel multiverse -- not an actual multiverse that Owen randomly put in a shoebox.

Owen was simplifying Schrodinger's thought experiment to Lifebringer, which revolves around the principal of quantum possibilities -- hence his initial 'cat in the box' analogy(look it up, it's an actual thing.)

That being said, the takeaway of the thought experiment is ultimately: "Whatever you may think you know, you don't really know what's in the box until you open it up and look inside" -- and that's what Owen was conveying to Lifebringer there with his visual representation of the multiverse. It was his way of explaining that much of what used to be in the previous creation, still was.

I mean, the whole issue was full of metaphors. It also started and ended with the myth of Sisyphus and the impossible task, for example:
https://i.imgur.com/W3e6B4U.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kvjrnrj.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8QA8K1I.jpg


With that in mind, Owen begins explaining the human thought experiment to Lifebringer, using Schrodinger's 'cat in a box' paradox as an analogy. However, he then shifts their discussion to the current state of the multiverse using the same basic analogy: that everything isn't necessarily as it seems -- there could be anything inside the box('box' being a metaphor for the new/unsolidified Marvel multiverse that was in a state of flux at the time.)

And like I said above: the entire scene was packed with metaphors. That was Owen's way of explaining the current state of the multiverse to Lifebringer, without being overly explicit:
(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)


The 'multiverse in a box' seemed to have been intended as a purely visual aid that Owen used to help Lifebringer see the bigger picture. All context considered, we are really never led to believe that he placed an actual/full-scale multiverse inside a shoebox for the lulz, just to randomly show it off like that... Imo, it's akin to the visual representation of a universe that Franklin whipped-up for Galactus here:

(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)

________________


As for Owen himself: he was definitely intended to be quite powerful under Ewing -- above Lifebringer, for sure... But also keep in mind that Marvel's entire cosmology was brand new(and extremely unstable) during The Ultimates, and as a result, things were able to happen that wouldn't normally be possible in a fully 'solidified' cosmos. This fact was repeatedly stated/shown on panel:
https://i.imgur.com/SXTFvjw.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/9H5MVsE.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/z41t60e.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/7XIyxY7.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/BWEhZI1.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/mWgYW1S.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/utUBIOp.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/WILIfsh.jpg

So it's really hard to accurately gauge *any* power-levels from that series... Especially where the cosmic beings are concerned.

After all, Owen certainly didn't appear to be kept at those same, upper-echelon levels in his more recent appearances. That's for sure.
Excellent stuff thumb up

Need to bookmark this stuff for future use because you KNOW the same debate is gonna pop up again. :rolleyesL


__________________

Old Post Oct 17th, 2019 01:25 AM
LordGod is currently offline Click here to Send LordGod a Private Message Find more posts by LordGod Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Wonder Man
Most Powerful Avenger

Gender: Male
Location: United States Lake Ontario, NY

Owen basicly told everyone to trust life.


__________________


Ion: Sub-Atomic Power

Old Post Oct 17th, 2019 11:44 PM
Wonder Man is currently offline Click here to Send Wonder Man a Private Message Find more posts by Wonder Man Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 04:57 AM.
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Owen feat vs Mxy feat

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.