I also believe that Jaden has been blatantly moved the goalposts in his reply.
It went from “claim by a scientist” to a “scientific claim” w/c are both very different from one another (I am paraphrasing of course). Essentially an act by a specific type of person to a specific type of action. Again, very distinct from one another.
Of course, if you think I am wrong, feel free to point out how as I am interested to learn why you think no goalposts were moved here.
I didn’t really watch the video nor read the rest of the arguments, so I cannot argue on the correctness of his argument but this stuck out to me.
The only paper she refers to in her video is the 97% consensus one. Her criticism of the way it's portrayed is correct but she clearly tried to also attack the paper itself and she was wrong because it doesn't say there's a 97% consensus regarding human caused climate change. It states that 62% of the studies don't give any attribution.
__________________ Sweating on the streets of Woking
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Remember the El Paso shooter believed climate change was a huge threat too.
I wonder if that guy being in their corner is an indicator of where they are...
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.