He still resisted a Star. That axe healed him. Thor would beat the hulk with the axe but I bring him up because the Hulk is stronger and more durable. Thor is more skilled and has better powers. The chip is a plot device like knite.
That is not addressing the issue. We see regular humans knock him on his ass. Black Manta could hurt him and had the power to end himwhereas the Hulk tore through plenty of Hulkbuster armor in a much more impressive display of strength.
Yes, the movie made it clear the only avenger able to survive a snap was of the Avengers was Hulk with Thor in the room. Thor has never beaten the Hulk with his weapon or with lightning. You can pretend all you want.
So a plot device saved Thor too. You get the point?
Nope. Thor just wasn't in a good shape, but Thor also said he was the strongest avenger and no one argued , banner didn't even refute it.
Lol grandmaster knew Thor could have ended the hulk, that's why he stopped Thor. Hulk was helpless looking at his face,lol that scene was hilarious. And Thor wasn't even trying to fight hulk, however when he got serious violent hulk became a girl.
No, since Thor and his regular gear is not a plot device outside of his abilities.
Banner said no one else could survive. Point blank. It takes two of Thors arms to hold one of the Hulks. You can pretend Thor is stronger when the films gave blatantly told us otherwise. How much sense would it make for Thor to not defeat the hulk with two attempts if he is stronger, more durable, more skilled, and with better powers?
GM is not all knowing and did not take the risk. Thor did not beat him in avengers one either. You can pretend him not winning a fight is just strength based but it just makes you look foolish tbh.
Ah so you agree that without Stormbreaker Thor would have died then?
Yeah and Banner included himself among the "no one".
So you feel hulk should at least possess one advantage right?
Strength maybe debatable but durability is not at all.
It was clear that Thor had the upper hand in that fight even when holding back, how you didn't see that is beyond me.
So what makes you say that Hulk is stronger than Thor?
That is not the point. It is speculative but he still resisted a Star whereas a rig kod Superman.
No he implied he was the only one who could survive which he was correct. Ffs we see him survive you idiot.
It makes no sense for a character to not go down when he does not have one advantage. None. Durability and strength. Hands down. EG proved it once and for all.