These Superman debate threads of who's stronger will always have their share of Supes haters, none of these guys have feats to match him, the vid we o is waaaaaayyyy off.
And nice to see despite Abhi's defection to Dragon Ball, some "real" fans are out there besides LoB.
And he's so crazy, I'm not sure he even knows Superman is a fiction.
__________________ What CDTM believes;
Never let anyone else define you. Don't be a jerk just to be a jerk, but if you are expressing your true inner feelings and beliefs, or at least trying to express that inner child, and everyone gets pissed off about it, never NEVER apologize for it. Let them think what they want, let them define you in their narrow little minds while they suppress every last piece of them just to keep a friend that never liked them for themselves in the first place.
Something that Supes or any of these guys could have replicated, people like to say that "he held two universes apart", but only by two planets as you've said, a very impressive feat for sure but all at the same time not so much as people make it out to be.
Regarding the video in the OP, with the exception of Captain Marvel and Gladiator, all these rip-offs were created AFTER John Byrne rebooted and made Superman as weak as a glass of water in comparison to his previous incarnation, these writers came along and created these phonies based off of Supes and decided that they will make them more powerful than the genuine article and these Marvel fanboys and Superman haters lap it up like a cat drinking a saucer full of milk.
Very tiresome, they did this at a time when DC vastly toned down Clark's power set, I understand the use of Superman being divided up into different versions of himself historically for the sake of this forum, but to most fans of Kent SUPERMAN IS SUPERMAN!!!!!!.........golden age, silver age, bronze age, post Byrne, new 52 and rebirth be damned, none of these copies do not have feats on the same level historically as Clark and will never achieve his popularity and iconic status and you don't see that much of any of them in any media outlet, any outlandish feats that any writer gives them is just an attempt to unseat that which has been long established and made known in the minds of the general populace over the decades by the genuine article.