KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » The Next Supreme Court Justice

The Next Supreme Court Justice
Started by: BrolyBlack

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (41): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
BrolyBlack
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Among The Stars

Account Restricted

So Schumer wouldn’t confirm a SCOTUS if he was in the same situation?

You must be joking


__________________



Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:13 PM
BrolyBlack is currently offline Click here to Send BrolyBlack a Private Message Find more posts by BrolyBlack Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BrolyBlack
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Among The Stars

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
The tears from this news will keep a smile on my face until christmas, this is going to be hillary clinton losing the election plus level of shenanigans and tears


laughing out loudlaughing out loud

Mark my words. People will be laying down blocking senators from entering the building, room, halls where ever they have to to try and stop them from voting.

We will have memes for ages.


__________________



Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:15 PM
BrolyBlack is currently offline Click here to Send BrolyBlack a Private Message Find more posts by BrolyBlack Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

So we’re going to have a 6-3 conservative majority.

Will be interesting to see what the dem response is. See if they have the balls to even respond if they win the senate and the presidency.


__________________

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:19 PM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

When people start losing their freedoms because the supreme court is too far to the Right and not more balanced as it should be, they'll be more inclined to not vote in those people and types of people who made that type of court possible.


But as mentioned, what Biden needs to do when the Dems end up taking the Senate either in 2020 or 2022, push congress to finally make Puerto Rico a state, it's deplorable that Puerto Ricans are treated as second-class citizens. He should also push to make DC it's own state, it's time.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:29 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
snowdragon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in time

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
When people start losing their freedoms because the supreme court is too far to the Right and not more balanced as it should be, they'll be more inclined to not vote in those people and types of people who made that type of court possible.



What freedoms are we going to be losing?

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:31 PM
snowdragon is currently offline Click here to Send snowdragon a Private Message Find more posts by snowdragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

I don’t believe Washington DC itself could be a state. It’s in the constitution. But what they could do it create a new state out of what is currently considered Washington DC and just make DC the mall and congressional building where people don’t live. People were never meant to live in DC anyways. Could make it like North Virginia or South Maryland or something. Could also add Guam.


__________________

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:35 PM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
What freedoms are we going to be losing?


You're a White hetero male, so probably none. Rejoice!


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:36 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by BackFire
I don’t believe Washington DC itself could be a state. It’s in the constitution. But what they could do it create a new state out of what is currently considered Washington DC and just make DC the mall and congressional building where people don’t live. People were never meant to live in DC anyways. Could make it like North Virginia or South Maryland or something. Could also add Guam.


Fair enough.

Puerto Rico for sure thugh, they're American citizens, but don't have seats in Congress and can't vote. That shit needs to change.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:37 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by BackFire
So we’re going to have a 6-3 conservative majority.

Will be interesting to see what the dem response is. See if they have the balls to even respond if they win the senate and the presidency.


The Supreme Court should have 9-0 conservative* majority. Judicial activism at the federal level should never be a thing. It should always be about Original Intent and never judicial activism. Leave that for legislators.


*The political science definition of "conservative." Not the sexist, racist, xenophobic American definition. As in, conserving the law in the most minimalist approach without changing it unless there is a very valid reason. Roe vs. Wade should never have happened. That should have been a legislative change.


__________________

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:39 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BrolyBlack
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Among The Stars

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by I’m mad
This was always going to go through**, anyone who thought Rightist were going to abide by their own rules and logic as they insisted in 2016, well, you were deluded.

**Mitch McConnell was asked a year+ ago of what would happen if a SC seat became vacant in election year 2020 and with his smug creepy smile said 'we would fill it'.

All this Trumper talk of "well, this is different!", it's just typical shit-weasel speak; pay it no mind. Precedent set though.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So Schumer wouldn’t confirm a SCOTUS if he was in the same situation?

You must be joking
quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
This was always going to go through**, anyone who thought Rightist were going to abide by their own rules and logic as they insisted in 2016, well, you were deluded.

**Mitch McConnell was asked a year+ ago of what would happen if a SC seat became vacant in election year 2020 and with his smug creepy smile said 'we would fill it'.

All this Trumper talk of "well, this is different!", it's just typical shit-weasel speak; pay it no mind. Precedent set though.


__________________



Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:40 PM
BrolyBlack is currently offline Click here to Send BrolyBlack a Private Message Find more posts by BrolyBlack Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BrolyBlack
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Among The Stars

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
The Supreme Court should have 9-0 conservative* majority. Judicial activism at the federal level should never be a thing. It should always be about Original Intent and never judicial activism. Leave that for legislators.


*The political science definition of "conservative." Not the sexist, racist, xenophobic American definition. As in, conserving the law in the most minimalist approach without changing it unless there is a very valid reason. Roe vs. Wade should never have happened. That should have been a legislative change.


Judicial Activism has destroyed America


__________________



Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:41 PM
BrolyBlack is currently offline Click here to Send BrolyBlack a Private Message Find more posts by BrolyBlack Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Newjak
I am Beyond Power

Gender: Male
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
This was always going to go through**, anyone who thought Rightist were going to abide by their own rules and logic as they insisted in 2016, well, you were deluded.

**Mitch McConnell was asked a year+ ago of what would happen if a SC seat became vacant in election year 2020 and with his smug creepy smile said 'we would fill it'.

All this Trumper talk of "well, this is different!", it's just typical shit-weasel speak; pay it no mind. Precedent set though.
Yeah as soon as I heard of RBG's death I didn't even have to look up what the Senate was doing.

I knew the GOP was going to fill it.


__________________

sig by Rao Kal El

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:42 PM
Newjak is currently offline Click here to Send Newjak a Private Message Find more posts by Newjak Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BrolyBlack
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Among The Stars

Account Restricted

As is their constitutional duty. No where does it say they have to all vote a certain way. It’s like your inept


__________________



Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:45 PM
BrolyBlack is currently offline Click here to Send BrolyBlack a Private Message Find more posts by BrolyBlack Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
snowdragon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in time

quote:
That should have been a legislative change.


That is one of the biggest problems we have with congress now for probably the last 10-12 years. Rather then legislate tough laws they pass it along to the courts or even the president.

Classic case deals with dreamers, DACA isn't legal it was only kept up in a court for moral reasons, in reality the Senate should have passed legislation to handle that problem.

Of course that's just one of MANY that our congress punts on.

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:48 PM
snowdragon is currently offline Click here to Send snowdragon a Private Message Find more posts by snowdragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
That is one of the biggest problems we have with congress now for probably the last 10-12 years. Rather then legislate tough laws they pass it along to the courts or even the president.

Classic case deals with dreamers, DACA isn't legal it was only kept up in a court for moral reasons, in reality the Senate should have passed legislation to handle that problem.

Of course that's just one of MANY that our congress punts on.


The only way the senate will pass such legislation is to remove the filibuster.


__________________

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:50 PM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
wxyz
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
You're a White hetero male, so probably none. Rejoice!


Everything is racist, sexist, and homophobic to you people.

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:52 PM
wxyz is currently offline Click here to Send wxyz a Private Message Find more posts by wxyz Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
eThneoLgrRnae
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
What freedoms are we going to be losing?



Killing innocent defenseless unborn babies. Yeah, apparently that is the "right" we are gonna be losing lol.


Nevermind the fact that the right to life is the most fundamental of all rights. Nah, it's not that. If you support an unborn baby's right to life then it's obvious you just hate women lmao.


Robbie is just fear mongering and projecting of course.They are the two most overused tactics from the left. Everyone knows that it's the left that wants to get rid of individual rights and even the Constiturion itself that , in their minds, is just a piece of paper written by a bunch of racist old white men.


It's so adorable when leftists like Robbie suddenly pretend to care about our rights which are laid out in our founding documents; documents which we all know that they want to do away with.


__________________
Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth bound feathered dinosaur. But it is not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.-- Alan Feduccia-a world authority on birds, quoted in "Archaeopteryx:Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms," Science 1994, p.764-765

Last edited by eThneoLgrRnae on Sep 22nd, 2020 at 04:56 PM

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:53 PM
eThneoLgrRnae is currently offline Click here to Send eThneoLgrRnae a Private Message Find more posts by eThneoLgrRnae Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by snowdragon
That is one of the biggest problems we have with congress now for probably the last 10-12 years. Rather then legislate tough laws they pass it along to the courts or even the president.

Classic case deals with dreamers, DACA isn't legal it was only kept up in a court for moral reasons, in reality the Senate should have passed legislation to handle that problem.

Of course that's just one of MANY that our congress punts on.



One of my political science professors (wish I could dox him and put his name out there because he should have his own YouTube channel where he talks about all this stuff but he's too shy - prefers the classroom) went into details about this. He pointed out that the most powerful branch of government is he legislative branch and it is the most powerful by design: it technically represents the voice of the people so it should be the loudest.

If the legislative branch is united, they could literally rule over the entire country by changing the constitution, getting rid of the president, getting rid of the Justices, etc. They control it all. The Founders were counting on a lack of unity to keep the legislative branch in check. Because if 70 senators are united on almost all issues, they effectively become the leaders of the country immediately. That's enough for any constitutional changes, overrides of vetos, cloture votes, any legislation changes, etc.


__________________

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:54 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by wxyz
Everything is racist, sexist, and homophobic to you people.


Your deflection aside, you probably don't have to worry about the Supreme Court ruling what you can and can't do with our own body or who you can or can't marry, as two examples.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 04:57 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Newjak
Yeah as soon as I heard of RBG's death I didn't even have to look up what the Senate was doing.

I knew the GOP was going to fill it.


McConneel in 2016: "The American people are perfectly capable of having their say on this issue, so let's give them a voice. Let's let the American people decide. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter when it considers the qualifications of the nominee the next president nominates, whoever that might be."


^It was all about letting the voters have a say in regards to the nect SC justice in 2016 as the reason why McConnell would not even allow Obama's pick to go to a vote. See, pay no mind to KMC Trumper's shit-weasel speak.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2020 05:00 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 03:13 AM.
Pages (41): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » The Next Supreme Court Justice

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.