Yes it is, when they is no claim. I simply stated the writer can retcon the inconsistency with the shield being able to respond to Cap's mental commands. They have the authority to do it.
Adamantium is fictional. Can a metal that can cut through all current man made (or natural) materials with the strength of Logan exist? We don't know. That's like asking if lasers can be created in the stone age. Most (in the stoneage) will say no, be we all know better.
No. There are limits to the molecular binding-strength of alloys, and no compound behaves like vibranium.
The hardest thing we know of is "nuclear pasta," which exists in the transitioning layers of the neutron superfluid and proton-neutron superfluid in neutron stars.
Naturally this couldn't exist outside a neutron star because without the pressure holding it together it would just explode.
Gender: Male Location: United States
Lake Ontario, NY
An infinite number of computing I.e. pi creates an infinite number of possibilities that creates 1 indestructible or proof of singular if you will. They already proved black 🕳 holes.
I'm assuming that Adamantium is physically indestructible.
The problem with alloys is that they rely metallic bonds (which aren't that strong) which is why the hardest alloys don't compare to the hardest compounds.
(please log in to view the image)
Last edited by Astner on Sep 10th, 2021 at 06:56 PM
Speaking of cutting metals. Cutters made of polycrystalline diamonds are not designed for cutting hard materials like stainless steels or titanium alloys, but softer materials like aluminum and graphite in which their "lifetime" is indefinite as long as it's used correctly.
But if you use it to cut harder materials the edge will wear out and break off (even though it's harder) and since they're ten times more expensive it's not an affordable option.
Are you expecting me to post an article on the theoretical limits to the hardness that can be achieved with metallic bonds, or what exactly are you looking for?
The hardness comes down to the energy binding the molecules together, and metallic bonds relies on the strength of its electron cloud which comparatively isn't that strong.
This is a pretty well-researched field because there's a lot of money to be made of industry.
Last edited by Astner on Sep 10th, 2021 at 07:36 PM
Why post all this? Just prove the statement i posted. Yes since i asked you to prove a statement. Also alloys not need to be composed solely of metals. And we do not know if there is another process (not invented yet) to create such a strong alloy.
His assumption was wrong (adamantium is physically indestructible) so any science built off that assumption leads to a faulty conclusion. Yet I'm using something else? Stop trolling and read the exchange first.
Gender: Male Location: United States
Lake Ontario, NY
Reality is for people who walk upright. So Adamantium is part of survival of the fittest. If access from upright can implement it it can be ✔️ done. The math 🧮 is good.