Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Standard Lestov setup

Who wins?

Bourne>Rambo in any scenario except one involving a jungle or forest.

can answer now after watching lakers game

Bourne takes care of business

Elaborate on the conditions.

you guys are crazy rambo is a killing machine he is bourne + more...

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Elaborate on the conditions.

The Standard Lestov Set-up:

H2H, Bourne, easily.

Hand Guns (speed and accuracy): Rambo, easily.

Automatics: Rambo, easily.

Sniping: Dang...I give it to Bourne, slightly.

Durability: I'd like to see some arguments on this one but I will give it to Rambo.

Pure killing ability: Definitely Rambo.

Badassery factor: hands down, easily Rambo. he LOOKS like an ultimate solider should look.



1. Bourne.
2. Rambo.
3. Rambo, but he may take a hit in the process.
4. Bourne. Bourne is more of an assassin than a battlefield beast.

1. H2H fight= Bourne
2. Knife fight in an abandoned warehouse= Rambo
3. Shootout in an abandoned NYC Subway Station. Both have a Beretta 92fs with unlimited ammo= Rambo....easily.
4. Who was the more efficient killer?= Bourne can hide from anyone.

Originally posted by the ninjak
1. H2H fight= Bourne
2. Knife fight in an abandoned warehouse= Rambo
3. Shootout in an abandoned NYC Subway Station. Both have a Beretta 92fs with unlimited ammo= Rambo....easily.
4. Who was the more efficient killer?= Bourne can hide from anyone.


We're twins...WEEEEEE!

Great minds.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Hand Guns (speed and accuracy): Rambo, easily.


Nah

7:10

s4efr_NASQE

Durability - in that same scene he falls from at least five stories and survives, recovering within seconds. And a lot of other feats I cbs naming...

I can see Rambo only taking it if the gun fight is a spraying contest

1) Bourne, obvious.

2) Bourne, he held off a guy with a knife who was faster and more agile than Rambo with a pen.

3) Bourne. Rambo is generally a spray at guys(who have ridiculously shit aim) while making a stupid face, Bourne showed to be a more capable marksman.

4) Hard to say. If we just count bodies, Rambo, he's got more films and a few of his films are based on having a scene where morons just charge in for the slaughter. Bourne restrains from killing, though he's shown to be able to take out guys in a non-lethal fashion with extreme proficiency and quickness.

-Durability, I'd edge it to Bourne, but not by much. 1st film he took several shots to the back, fell into the ocean for some time and not only survived, but was ready to rip out throats the second he gained concious. 3rd film, was shot again and fell several stories into the water, only to swin away across the canal. That car crash in part 2(?) was pretty severe too, which he walked/limped away from.

Originally posted by Robtard
1) Bourne, obvious.

2) Bourne, he held off a guy with a knife who was faster and more agile than Rambo with a pen.

3) Bourne. Rambo is gnerally a spray at guys(who have ridiculously shit aim) while making a stupid face, Bourne showed to be capable marksman.

4) Hard to say. If we just count bodies, Rambo, he's got more films and a few of his films are based on having a scene where morons just charge in for the slaughter. Bourne restrains from killing, though he's shown to be able to take out guys in a non-lethal fashion with extreme proficiency and quickness. Remember when Rambo capped the pirates in IV?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Remember when Rambo capped the pirates in IV?

I do(2nd best Rambo flick); while impressive, Bourne taking a dive and making a kill while falling is better overall.

Originally posted by Robtard
I do; while impressive, Bourne taking a dive and making a kill while falling is better overall. I had to watch the scene I mentioned in slomo. DAMN he was fast.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
can answer now after watching lakers game

Bourne takes care of business As do the Lakers.