Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

As an unofficial Bond film, how is it compared to the official Bond films? is it worth buying?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f65/t18867.html
merging

yes, mod clovs


well, it's a remake of Thunderball... and Sean is bald in it... so better see the original one

i will get it merged.....angel_not


i didn't know it is a remake..
i know kim basinger plays there

I've seen Thunderball, but you still never answered my question. Is it worth seeing or buying?

So that's a no?

I would say no... the original is always better

Alright, thanks alot.

"Don't thank me, thank the moon's gravitational pull"

That damn hairpiece of Connery's still haunts me, you know ...

Perhaps I was being a bit too harsh in the other "NSNA" thread; the film isn't THAT crap, it just doesn't have anything to really recommend it. The story is {obviously} just a re-hash, the action is uninspired, the FX hokey in parts {even by the standards of the day}, and it's just downright strange in terms of the way in which it messes with established character traits {An old JB? A young M? A cockney Q called Algernon? A black Felix?}. Hard to believe that Irving Kershner {the director of "The Empire Strikes Back", people} helmed this mess ...

Having said that, Connery was still undeniably cool after all those years away {adding an intriguing, almost "world weary" quality to Bond for this adventure}, and some bits are undeniably fun {such as the "world domination" game}.

What do you guys think?

but ahnold, it only moved a bit

I thought that the Volpe in this movie got closer to the naughty nurse version

Originally posted by yerssot
But ahnold, it only moved a bit.

That's not the point; it looks SO unbelievably fake! It's vying with William Shatner's rug for the title of "worst hairpiece ever" ...

Heh - I'm a bit obsessed, aren't I?

no, not really... everyone could see that it was a hairpiece and a darn ugly one too