Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Rules:
Prime saber versions of Sidious and Yoda; whenever you think that is
Sabers only fight
No amps for contestants unless noted
Prime for all combatants
Legends feats if applicable


Would X last longer against Yoda or Sheev?

- Darth Tyranus
- Rebels Tano
- RotS Vader
- RotJ Vader
- Windu (just pure saber skill; no dark-side channeling amp)
- Malgus
- Jaina Solo
- Maul

I feel like Windu and / or RotS Skywalker would fare the best against Palpatine, and probably the same two with Yoda. You could replace Windu with Dooku for Yoda, though.

In order.

- RotJ Vader
- Darth Tyranus
- Rebels Tano/RotS Vader/Windu/Malgus/Jaina Solo
- Maul

Anakin picks Yoda up by the throat and throws him out a fcking window.

Discounting Malgus, dunno why is he there, he's on too high level to discuss that.

1. Mace Windu
2. RotJ Darth Vader
3. Count Dooku / RotS Vader (Mustafar, I guess?) / Jaina Solo - there are disparities within these three, obviously - some pretty large. But in comparison to gods like Yoda or Sidious disparity between Jaina and Dooku is almost non-existent if Yoda/Palpatine go all out.
4. Rebels Ahsoka Tano / Darth Maul - same as above.

No, no, no peasants. (Joker got it semi-correct)

Taking into consideration their forms' strengths and weaknesses, would Dooku last longer against Sidious or Yoda in a 1on1 fight. Then continue for the rest.

This is not a team fight.

Dooku would do better against Yoda then he would Sidious in an objective sense since Yoda mains Ataru and Dooku's intimately familiar with its weaknesses.

He's probably do just as well against Sidious though given Yoda is the superior duelist of the two. *Shrug*

All of them are going to fare better against Yoda. Quite simply, DE Sidious is greater than RotS Yoda. But, even if one uses RotS Sidious, they would all fare better against Yoda. Not because Sidious is better but rather because as a Sith he will be a more dominant fighter than a Jedi like Yoda.

Ah, DE Sidious. Didn't catch that.

Maul is going to do better against Sidious than against Yoda because of better preparation and experience.

RotJ Vader probably too - not that Vader is truly limited in mobility, but mobility is definitely one of his weaker traits compared to other skills in combat, and that will put him at a terrible disadvantage against Yoda, not as much as it would do against Palpatine.

Others would fare better against Yoda than against Palpatine, simply because Palpatine is more aggresive, and far more reliant on direct speed attack connected with pure aggression.

Originally posted by JKBart
Discounting Malgus, dunno why is he there, he's on too high level to discuss that.

1. Mace Windu
2. RotJ Darth Vader
3. Count Dooku / RotS Vader (Mustafar, I guess?) / Jaina Solo - there are disparities within these three, obviously - some pretty large. But in comparison to gods like Yoda or Sidious disparity between Jaina and Dooku is almost non-existent if Yoda/Palpatine go all out.
4. Rebels Ahsoka Tano / Darth Maul - same as above. Do you think he beats Yoda?

Malgus, I mean.

Most of them are fooder. Some of them are semi fooder.

Honest question: How do you guys think prime Revan would fare against morals on Yoda?

Originally posted by ares834
They would all fare better against Yoda. Not because Sidious is better but rather because as a Sith he will be a more dominant fighter than a Jedi like Yoda.

This.

Originally posted by ares834
All of them are going to fare better against Yoda. Quite simply, DE Sidious is greater than RotS Yoda. But, even if one uses RotS Sidious, they would all fare better against Yoda. Not because Sidious is better but rather because as a Sith he will be a more dominant fighter than a Jedi like Yoda.
Yeah, really this.

Assuming both ROTS versions for Yoda and Palpatine:
- Dooku would do better against Yoda
- Ahsoka would do better against Yoda, I guess. She's totaly unfamiliar with Sidious fighting style
- ROTS Vader would do better against Sidious, mostly because Yoda is far too small and agile, target like Sidious would be easier to execute Vader's style.
- ROTJ Vader like above
- Mace like above
- Malgus like above
- Jaina no idea
- Maul would do better against Sidious, he knows him after all

Maul knows Sidious hehe. Didn't stop him from getting pwned

Yeah, Sidious is much more brutal and more likely to use the Force mid-combat. If he's not holding back to revel in his opponent's struggles, then yeah, he demolishes anyone here. Yoda would be somewhat more reserved, I'd think.

Sabers only Nova.

Sidious don't care for Rules.

Everyone of them would get destroyed.

Yes but the purpose of this thread is to establish who'd do better against who based on their lightsaber styles, knowledge of Sidious/Yoda, etc.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Yeah, Sidious is much more brutal and more likely to use the Force mid-combat. If he's not holding back to revel in his opponent's struggles, then yeah, he demolishes anyone here. Yoda would be somewhat more reserved, I'd think.

Well, according to ROTS script (which isn't - unlike Stover novel - contradicts the movie), Whirlwind of destruction was able to overhelm and disarm Sidious himself. I wouldn't say, that he was less agressive duelist. As all-out fighter, indeed, Palpatine was far more agressive.
And as I remember - according to "Jedi Path" - Luke stated, that Sith' Juyo might be inferior to Jedi's forms in a longer fight

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Yes but the purpose of this thread is to establish who'd do better against who based on their lightsaber styles, knowledge of Sidious/Yoda, etc.

That would be RotS Vader, then, at the height of his power, during Knightfall