Originally posted by |King Joker|
Oh dear.
Things must be bad when you're giving Quan a thumbs up.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
You mean like failing to respond to me in the other thread? Lmfao, you're full of shit as usual.
I'm sorry, I sometimes lose track of threads I'm posting on. It happens you know. Doesn't mean I conceded the point, as we're still talking about it. So who gives a damn about the other thread Lol
Originally posted by |King Joker|
high standing within Lucasfilm and is extremely relevant when it comes to continuity and story.Nothing has changed that's made his word less reliable, lmao; he still holds high standing within Lucasfilm and is extremely relevant when it comes to continuity and story.
Urm... did you really just imply nothing has changed since Disney took over LMAO
Let me explain this to you. Lucas used to be Mr. Canon. Filoni used to go on about "Lucas said this and that", and was the only spokesman out there for a while regarding actual Lucas canon. So yeah I used to cling to his words more. But now Canon is a much more complex thing, and no one guy dictates it. At most we take his commentary on the series he works on seriously. But that doesn't mean he gets power to declare Ahsoka as the no.3 person in the whole of the OT era LMAO
And frankly only a fanboy would cling to such a vague implication.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Damn. "Ohh durr hurr ur Filoni's biggest fan!!!!", while being completely oblivious to the fact you gave him blow jobs daily, months prior. This is amazing. And you're talking about double standards and hypocrisy, lmfao.
Again, my views in the past, and present being different is not Double Standards LMAO
You might learn that as you grow up.
If however I'm taking his word RIGHT NOW when it suits me, but IGNORING them RIGHT NOW when it doesn't, then that would be Double Standards.
Jeez I'm glad I'm not your teacher.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
You've conceded he implies it. Good enough for me.
Yes, but an implication is hardly a canon fact. And neither is Filoni's word equal to that of what Lucas's word was in the past. So I will call you out on both fronts every time you try to act like it's Canon now that Ahsoka > Maul.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
What the **** are you even talking about? How have I started taking his word as the gospel truth? I don't take anything about what he says about Luke seriously, for example, but if I worshiped him I would. Sorry if I put stock into what Filoni says in regards to his own ideas and characters, lmao.
Jeez you are all over the place aren't you. Just a few paragraphs up you're sucking up to his stature in Lucasfilm, his Knowledge of the characters, story and Canon, and now suddenly you only put stock into his OWN IDEAS and OWN CHARACTERS.
Okay cool. Glad we got that cleared. So tell me, whose character is Savage? Lmao
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Nothing regarding my stance on the quotes is a double standard.
I get that's true in your head yeah. But I'm afraid it's called DENIAL.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Even your deluded ass thinks it implies Ahsoka is superior to Maul, so I'm pretty sure the average person (who's definitely much smarter than you) has no qualms with viewing the quote as handy evidence for Ahsoka > Maul.
Yawn, addressed this above.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Sorry for contradicting your false notion that I take Filoni's word as the word of Christ.

It's becoming increasingly apparent you despise critical thinking, or are just incapable of it.
So a mega mega fan of Ahsoka clings to Filoni implying Ahsoka > Maul and takes it as canon fact. Then I challenge that but it's apparently me who despises critical thinking.
Son you need to learn the meaning of those big words you sprout out.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Filoni's quote regarding Savage doesn't mean he's better than the B-Team because you have to factor in Sidious's varying levels of effort in the two fights. I'm sorry you can't comprehend that.
Ah so Filoni DIRECTLY saying Savage performed better than the B-Team, doesn't mean Savage performed better than the B-Team due to outside factors.
But Filoni IMPLYING Ahsoka > Maul, means just that. Screw any external factors that might be present right?
Are we learning what Double Standards are yet?
As for Sidious holding back, I'm pretty sure Filoni was aware of that, and yet he still Specifically Credited Savage for doing better than the B-Team. He didn't put it down to Sidious screwing around. And there's actually no contradiction there whatsoever, given the best the B-Team did was Fisto deflecting 3-4 strikes of Sidious while fighting alongside Mace frigging Windu. So literally all Savage would need to do to to perform better than the B-Team is deflect 4-5 serious strikes of Palaptine's while fighting alongside a Weaker ally than Windu.
You're telling me it's not even possible now that 4-5 strikes of Sidious's against Savage in the entire 2 vs 1 duel might have been full on serious attacks?
Anything getting threw yet?
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Okay? Why does everyone need to hold your hand to explain things like this to you? If Filoni is implying Ahsoka is better than Maul, then his opinion on that is pretty relevant, for reasons I hope to ****ing God I don't have to explain to you. And for the record, I only use the quote as supplementary evidence in the overall case that Ahsoka > Maul, with various other arguments interworking together.
Yes because Filoni isn't capable of Bias on a character he's admittedly biased towards Lmao
Sure thing, whatever helps you to sleep at night.
No that is your Primary piece of "evidence" to state Ahsoka > Maul. There is no other evidence. She couldn't overpower him on Malachor (and you've yet to prove he was amped).
In fact it's far more likely it was Maul who was out of shape, given we have no idea how long he was stranded on Malachor. Which would also shed light on Filoni's quote given it was talking specifically about S2.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
And you sound like a smarmy little liar.
You're just incredibly stupid, and I never will (or have had) patience for stupidity.
Oh really and what have I lied about?
Nah there's nothing wrong with my intellect. More likely you know I'm right and you know I've called you out on your double standards. Given that you can't carry on debating without throwing a hissy fit and insults and accusations every other sentence. So it's easier fo you to join the Quan camp and just say "Urr der you just stupid.."
Oh and btw, going by your own logic (that I didn't respond on the other thread means I conceded), and by Quan's general logic, if you don't respond to this it means you've conceded Lmao