Originally posted by Dinoss
1.prove that the godblast is effected by thor's health, if superman will be a little hurt does that mean his heat vision willbe weaker? thats bullshit at its best
2.i dont recall galactus almost dying that was your own take on the situation, he was hurt thats it, and it wasnt just a weaken galactus it was a starving galactus that was basically galactus at his weakest, for all that i care maybe even surfer could kill him i dont know how weak he was but that was his weakest form ever
3. thor recently hurt a more powerful galactus than the one he hurt with the godblast, in both situations galactus was injured, with the godblast he was slightly more injured but then again he was weaker so i guess that evens the field, so by your logic now thor flying attack was a skyfather feat
4. ABC logic doesnt work, you cant bring the good old known A beats B who i think is more powerful than C and D failed to hurt C and then EFG came for the orgy... it doesnt work that way , unless you provide a straight feat that odin failed to accomplish and the godblast did accomplish i can only laugh at your statement that the godblast is > odin.
yes i got the idea how powrful the godblast is a high herald level attack , now its your job to get it
Good Lord.
1) The godblast comes from the inner power of Thor. His godly essence. If Thor health drops or he is experiencing weakeness, its common sense that his blast will be weaker. Not to mention his intentions were never to kill. That superman comparison is so far off it was flat out stupid.
2) Then you need to re-read it.
=======
Galactus
=======
Thor vs Galactus, from Thor #161:
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsGalactus01161.jpg
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsGalactus02.jpg
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsGalactus03.jpg
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsGalactus04.jpg
why are you saying it was his weakest form ever? Even IF that were true which I highly doubt...so what? Its not like Galactus was at herald level. He was still Glalactus. He was still ab beast. And while he was stated to be hungry, he was not dying or something already. Don't try and downplay feats like that. They are what they are. Nothing more to it. And what it was is Thor using a blst powerful enough to mortall wound a hungry galactus.
3. What are you basing this off of? What makes you say he was more powerful other than to benefit you point? And he wasn't "slightly" more injured. He got hit by Thor and hurt. Not almost killed. He healed pretty quick afterwards.
4. Nice try. But not how it works. This isn't if wolverine beat captain america and captain america beat spiderman, then Wolverine must beat spiderman. THAT is ABC logic. What i'm using is a perfectly valid argument as its just comparing blasts against celestial armor.
http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9053/thor30016ie7.jpg
^ The combined attack of three skyfathers is unable to even have Arishem notice the blast. Exitar is > Arishem. He has tougher exterior armor and his dome is > his outer armor.
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsCelestials16.jpg
^ Thor busts the Dome with his most powerful g-blast.
please quote me where I said "Godblast > Odin."

The entire purpose pf my reply's have been to prove that the g-blast isn't some sort of weak high herald max attack. And I did. You choosing to stamp your feet cross your arms and use the nuh-uh argument or just repeat your old wrong argument wont change that. in other words....
http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/uploads/gallery/1275691036/gallery_83989_34818_18246989334c0d883aa8feb.gif