Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Who the strongest between aquaman and spiderman?

Aquaman, by a fair distance.

Stronger? Aquaman.

Modern Aquaman if u take into account the city street he lifted underground and magic punch.. I dont know what other feats he has though..


Spiderman is only suppose to be around 10 to 15 tons in strength even though he has lifted what appears to be 100 tons in comics from time to time.

Aquaman did this:

http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee375/ArthurOrinCurry/Bits%20and%20Pieces/th_Aquamanv303-19.jpg

For example...

Originally posted by -Pr-
Aquaman did this:

http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee375/ArthurOrinCurry/Bits%20and%20Pieces/th_Aquamanv303-19.jpg

For example...

Ok... I was going to say that venom might fair better in the strength department, but nevermind...

Originally posted by -Pr-
Aquaman did this:

http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee375/ArthurOrinCurry/Bits%20and%20Pieces/th_Aquamanv303-19.jpg

For example... yeh, i remember that issue. Aquaman didnt actually hurt Superboy it was the whole thing about being underwater.

that was also a weaken version of Superboy which side arm was able to put in a bear hug and Dragon Lady was able to fight superboy in melee..

: /

I could post Spiderman throwing down with Firelord which would be far above Superboy or any other hundred tonners he has faced in the past.


http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/10/101644/2053972-thorvsspiderman.jpg

Originally posted by Nietzschean
yeh, i remember that issue. Aquaman didnt actually hurt Superboy it was the whole thing about being underwater.

that was also a weaken version of Superboy which side arm was able to put in a bear hug and Dragon Lady was able to fight superboy in melee..

: /

I could post Spiderman throwing down with Firelord which would be far above Superboy or any other hundred tonners he has faced in the past.


http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/10/101644/2053972-thorvsspiderman.jpg

What about being underwater?

Aquaman has plenty of feats showing him in the dozens of tons range, though.

aquaman recently had a good strength feat. post it, pr, post it!

Originally posted by Prep-Man
aquaman recently had a good strength feat. post it, pr, post it!

which one? the one where he tore a piece of the hull off of an atlantean ship? the one where he toppled that ledge underwater? where he flipped the truck?

Originally posted by -Pr-
What about being underwater?

Aquaman has plenty of feats showing him in the dozens of tons range, though. Superboy was panicked by being underwater and not being able to breath. his durability was completely dependent on his TK at that time and his concentration and being awake.

there was nothing impressive about the scan u posted it was more bias than anything b/c Aquaman might as well have bn punching a regular human or someone with low superhuman durability if u put it all in context.

here let me help u.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/30061/2049414-aquaman_v_superboy_3.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/30061/2049413-aquaman_v_superboy.jpg

sure Aquaman has his dozen ton range feats but so does spiderman and i am willing to go on a limb and say Spiderman has more of them that easily put him above if not equal to Aquaman and his feats

Originally posted by Nietzschean
Superboy was panicked by being underwater and not being able to breath. his durability was completely dependent on his TK at that time and his concentration and being awake.

there was nothing impressive about the scan u posted it was more bias than anything b/c Aquaman might as well have bn punching a regular human or someone with low superhuman durability if u put it all in context.

here let me help u.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/30061/2049414-aquaman_v_superboy_3.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/30061/2049413-aquaman_v_superboy.jpg

sure Aquaman has his dozen ton range feats but so does spiderman and i am willing to go on a limb and say Spiderman has more of them that easily put him above if not equal to Aquaman and his feats

Even if you wanted to argue that (though I don't agree), he still has feats I think Spider-Man would have trouble replicating.

Like using a crane as a bludgeoning tool, or knocking Martian Manhunter on his ass (twice), lifting a city block, throwing a bus at an Omac, supporting the weight of a building that was about to collapse, and the other stuff i mentioned of course.

Aquaman's strength is relatively more consistent than Spider-Man's, too.

really, b/c Spiderman has beaten firelord, fought the Hulk, held up a collapsing building more than once, flipped over a mini tank.. held up a rail train and tons of other strength feats in his long time career.

http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4701/1659801051072feat13stre.jpg

Originally posted by Nietzschean
really, b/c Spiderman has beaten firelord, fought the Hulk, held up a collapsing building more than once, flipped over a mini tank.. held up a rail train and tons of other strength feats in his long time career.

http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4701/1659801051072feat13stre.jpg

I'm talking about consistency, though.

And we both know Firelord doesn't count.

We're not even talking about who would win in a fight; we're talking about pound for pound physical strength, and for me, Aquaman is stronger.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I'm talking about consistency, though.

And we both know Firelord doesn't count.

We're not even talking about who would win in a fight; we're talking about pound for pound physical strength, and for me, Aquaman is stronger. and i am talking feat for feat and I say Spiderman has the superior bulk showing compared to Aquaman.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and i am talking feat for feat and I say Spiderman has the superior bulk showing compared to Aquaman.

I disagree. Spidey might have more feats, but I'd be willing to bet that Aquaman has more actual quality ones of higher tonnage.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Even if you wanted to argue that (though I don't agree), he still has feats I think Spider-Man would have trouble replicating.

Like using a crane as a bludgeoning tool, or knocking Martian Manhunter on his ass (twice), lifting a city block, throwing a bus at an Omac, supporting the weight of a building that was about to collapse, and the other stuff i mentioned of course.

Aquaman's strength is relatively more consistent than Spider-Man's, too. Spider-man has actually done teh exact same stuff. Except maybe the crane thing.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Spider-man has actually done teh exact same stuff. Except maybe the crane thing.

He's done all of that?

And again, this isn't everything Aquaman has done. That was just examples.

and then there's the fact that a lot of his strength feats are actually performed underwater, where pressures are far different to above sea-level.

I never understood the whole underwater argument. I mean sure it can increase weight to an extend but it can also lighten an object as well.. : /

besides Spiderman has underwater lifting feats as well..

Originally posted by Nietzschean
I never understood the whole underwater argument. I mean sure it can increase weight to an extend but it can also lighten an object as well.. : /

besides Spiderman has underwater lifting feats as well..

It's harder to move your muscles underwater, because of the pressure being exerted on you from the ocean around you. Ever feel the resistance when you run your hand across a pool of water? Imagine that times a thousand, and then apply it to Aquaman having to lift large objects while fighting hundreds of tons of pressure trying to stop him.

Originally posted by -Pr-
It's harder to move your muscles underwater, because of the pressure being exerted on you from the ocean around you. Ever feel the resistance when you run your hand across a pool of water? Imagine that times a thousand, and then apply it to Aquaman having to lift large objects while fighting hundreds of tons of pressure trying to stop him.

I don't think that's ever really factored into comics. Especially with characters like Aquaman, who are more at home in water than out it.

That's said I think he is stronger.

Originally posted by The Pict
I don't think that's ever really factored into comics. Especially with characters like Aquaman, who are more at home in water than out it.

That's said I think he is stronger.

I might agree with you if it hadn't been mentioned in several comics.

Originally posted by -Pr-
It's harder to move your muscles underwater, because of the pressure being exerted on you from the ocean around you. Ever feel the resistance when you run your hand across a pool of water? Imagine that times a thousand, and then apply it to Aquaman having to lift large objects while fighting hundreds of tons of pressure trying to stop him. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/ Does_the_weight_of_an_object_change_when_underwate
r

Originally posted by -Pr-
I might agree with you if it hadn't been mentioned in several comics.

Foiled by on panel evidence

Originally posted by Parmaniac
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/ Does_the_weight_of_an_object_change_when_underwate
r

Your link didn't work for me.

Originally posted by -Pr-
It's harder to move your muscles underwater, because of the pressure being exerted on you from the ocean around you. Ever feel the resistance when you run your hand across a pool of water? Imagine that times a thousand, and then apply it to Aquaman having to lift large objects while fighting hundreds of tons of pressure trying to stop him. I will admit u wont see spiderman swimming underwater lifting several tons but only b/c that is not his power set and it would be awkward for him to swim and lift but its not b/c he is weaker than aquaman.

but that again doesnt mean Aquaman is the strongest its his ability to adapt to those pressures and being in his natural enviroment.

Spiderman would be restricted by his need to breath and having air in his lungs his body not acclimated to swimming and lifting.

but put them both in a place where they can plant their feet and see who has the most lifting feats.. it sure isnt Aquaman imo.

I could make a similar argument with spiderman holding several tons upside down on a wall or ceiling and saying he is stronger b/c I dont see Aquaman doing it.

Spiderman is not only lifting the weight but fighting against earths gravity.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
I will admit u wont see spiderman swimming underwater lifting several tons but only b/c that is not his power set and it would be awkward for him to swim and lift but its not b/c he is weaker than aquaman.

but that again doesnt mean Aquaman is the strongest its his ability to adapt to those pressures and being in his natural enviroment.

Spiderman would be restricted by his need to breath and having air in his lungs his body not acclimated to swimming and lifting.

but put them both in a place where they can plant their feet and see who has the most lifting feats.. it sure isnt Aquaman imo.

I could make a similar argument with spiderman holding several tons upside down on a wall or ceiling and saying he is stronger b/c I dont see Aquaman doing it.

Spiderman is not only lifting the weight but fighting against earths gravity.

Aquaman regularly fights against more gravity than Spider-Man, though. And for me, in an equal setting, he's goint to be able to lift more.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Your link didn't work for me.

Yet I would agree that overall Aquaman is stronger but this fight isn't stomp unless he is allowed to mindrape.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Yet I would agree that overall Aquaman is stronger but this fight isn't stomp unless he is allowed to mindrape.

That's talking about things on the surface though; it's not taking in to account something at the bottom of the ocean. Yes, an object might be lighter to an extent, but the actual pressures of the ocean itself would crush most beings without the requisite durability, and would make movement very difficult for anything lacking the needed strength.

Originally posted by -Pr-
That's talking about things on the surface though; it's not taking in to account something at the bottom of the ocean. Yes, an object might be lighter to an extent, but the actual pressures of the ocean itself would crush most beings without the requisite durability, and would make movement very difficult for anything lacking the needed strength. You should read that again.

Originally posted by -Pr-
That's talking about things on the surface though; it's not taking in to account something at the bottom of the ocean. Yes, an object might be lighter to an extent, but the actual pressures of the ocean itself would crush most beings without the requisite durability, and would make movement very difficult for anything lacking the needed strength.

Is Aquaman like namor in that he can lift more under water, or is he just the same all around?

Originally posted by Parmaniac
You should read that again.

Did you edit?

Originally posted by jalek moye
Is Aquaman like namor in that he can lift more under water, or is he just the same all around?

water makes him more powerful, yes. it's like hitting superman with sunlight, just not to the same extent.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Yet I would agree that overall Aquaman is stronger but this fight isn't stomp unless he is allowed to mindrape. nice quote on the buoyancy which is what I am trying to get at.

@PR

the weight gravity is irrelevant that was my whole point. Aquaman is adapted to those pressures. any human would be as well if given time to acclimate. it doesnt mean he is stronger.

u know we pull fishes from the deepest oceans regularly and they arent super strong or durable b/c of the pressure they live in.

this is the misconception when it comes to aquaman that kinda irks me b/c there is no evidence for the argument being made.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Did you edit? Just bolded out the important parts, not the content you can copy paste it into google.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
nice quote on the buoyancy which is what I am trying to get at.

@PR

the weight gravity is irrelevant that was my whole point. Aquaman is adapted to those pressures. any human would be as well if given time to acclimate. it doesnt mean he is stronger.

u know we pull fishes from the deepest oceans regularly and they arent super strong or durable b/c of the pressure they live in.

this is the misconception when it comes to aquaman that kinda irks me b/c there is no evidence for the argument being made.

...

It's not a misconception, because it's been outright stated that Aquaman is tougher because of the pressures of the ocean. He has several atmospheres of pressure on his body at the deepest parts, and to exert that much strength underwater requires that he be very, very strong.

And you can't compare those fish to Aquaman; it's not the same principle.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Just bolded out the important parts, not the content you can copy paste it into google.

Yes, I saw that part. And?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Yes, I saw that part. And? You said it only applies for objects on the surface, it doesn't. Have you never lifted a weight under water? It's lighter, Astronauts train under water because they're lighter too to simulate lower gravity in space/on the moon. Things under water are not heavier than on land.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
You said it only applies for objects on the surface, it doesn't. Have you never lifted a weight under water? It's lighter, Astronauts train under water because they're lighter too to simulate lower gravity in space/on the moon. Things under water are not heavier than on land.

I'm not talking about the object's weight. I'm talking about Aquaman's ability to move and lift things at the bottom of the ocean where the pressure is so extreme it would turn submarines in to smears.

AM lifting something under water is like Superman lifting something in the sun.

Yes, it would be heavier than on the surface of the Earth, but the increase of power they receive negates the impressiveness.

Originally posted by -Pr-
...


Yes, I saw that part. And? I am sorry but i disagree with u on this.
drag resistance has nothing to due with strength in my opinion in this matter.


I will concede with u that Aquaman can lift more underwater only b/c of his ability to swim and being acclimated to the environment.



but, I dont agree that Aquaman is stronger on even footing surface world if we go by feats.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
I am sorry but i disagree with u on this.
drag resistance has nothing to due with strength in my opinion in this matter.


I will concede with u that Aquaman can lift more underwater only b/c of his ability to swim and being acclimated to the environment.



but, I dont agree that Aquaman is stronger on even footing surface world if we go by feats.

i'm not talking about drag resistance; i'm talking about atmospheric pressure. Aquaman, unlike a lot of that sea-life, has his own internal pressure, and said pressure has to negate the crushing depths of the ocean. that makes him super strong and super durable, and means that when he's on land, where the gravity isn't so intense, he's able to lift a whole lot more.

Originally posted by -Pr-
i'm not talking about drag resistance; i'm talking about atmospheric pressure. Aquaman, unlike a lot of that sea-life, has his own internal pressure, and said pressure has to negate the crushing depths of the ocean. that makes him super strong and super durable, and means that when he's on land, where the gravity isn't so intense, he's able to lift a whole lot more. and again atmospheric pressure doesnt mean much if u are acclimated by it. Aquaman more so since he breaths water which means he wont blow up and it becomes easier for him once his body matches the pressure of his surroundings.

we are going around in circles on this. I am finished with the underwater argument.

if u want to argue surface feet planted on the ground strength feat I be happy to continue discussing them two.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and again atmospheric pressure doesnt mean much if u are acclimated by it. Aquaman more so since he breaths water which means he wont blow up and it becomes easier for him once his body matches the pressure of his surroundings.

we are going around in circles on this. I am finished with the underwater argument.

if u want to argue surface feet planted on the ground strength feat I be happy to continue discussing them two.

but that's the thing; he's stronger and more durable BECAUSE he's adapted to the pressure. his body is strong enough to resist it and to move through it.

Sure, if you want.

The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work??

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work?? an anchor is dragged until it catches undo something.

but the object in question depends on how pores it is and even if it is a slap of metal or rock it still has its weight displaced by water.. hence it will be lighter to an extend.

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work?? Not the way you think, apparently.

Pr, why did you ignore me?

Originally posted by Odekahn
The pressure at the bottom of the ocean =/= the pressure at the bottom of a pool. Plus it also depends on what you're lifting. If you're lifting a person, of course it will be easier to pick them up because they have body fat and fat floats. But a 40 lb dumbbell will be just as hard or harder depending on how deep you are.

How do you people think ship anchors work?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

Originally posted by Mindset
Not the way you think, apparently.

Pr, why did you ignore me?

I just don't care.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

That isn't what we're talking about, though.

I speak facts.

You just

http://i40.tinypic.com/27zvzvd.gif

Originally posted by Mindset
I speak facts.

You just

http://i40.tinypic.com/27zvzvd.gif

I never said I disagreed with you.

Hold me.

Originally posted by Mindset
Hold me.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
an anchor is dragged until it catches undo something.



I was more so thinking of a deadweight anchor

Deadweight anchor
This is an anchor which relies solely on being a heavy weight. It is usually just a large block of concrete or stone at the end of the chain. Its holding power is defined by its weight underwater (i.e. taking its buoyancy into account) regardless of the type of seabed, although suction can increase this if it becomes buried.

But...

I did find this: Buoyancy reduces the apparent weight of objects that have sunk completely to the sea floor. It is generally easier to lift an object up through the water than it is to pull it out of the water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy#Density

So it would be easier to lift it than on land.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy

Go to Archimedes' principle, 2nd quote

Haha!! That's what I was doing while you posted that. Guess we thought a like.

I was wrong.

purely off feats alone and quantity on the surface world Spiderman is stronger by far.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatmanvsWolverine/news/?a=48785

Originally posted by Nietzschean
purely off feats alone and quantity on the surface world Spiderman is stronger by far.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatmanvsWolverine/news/?a=48785

You seriously think those are above Aquaman's best? That he couldn't reproduce those?

Too much nerd talk in this thread. Oh and arthur is stronger, a lot stronger than spidey. I can post a scan of cap holding a part of building too.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Too much nerd talk in this thread. Oh and arthur is stronger, a lot stronger than spidey. I can post a scan of cap holding a part of building too. cap isnt in this thread

Originally posted by Nietzschean
cap isnt in this thread
I was just giving an example of how heaps of feats alone don't make someone stronger.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I was just giving an example of how heaps of feats alone don't make someone stronger. and yet my argument was strictly by showings spiderman has more strength feats than Aquaman.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and yet my argument was strictly by showings spiderman has more strength feats than Aquaman.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.
By showings superman beats everyone else. That's not the case, is it? When was that?

I looked at the Spidey feats and cant see anything that Arthur would struggle with. This thread seems silly to me. Why isnt it obvious to everybody that Aquaman is stronger?

^ Well its kmc, what do you expect?

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and yet my argument was strictly by showings spiderman has more strength feats than Aquaman.

u want to argument be my guest, i agree with u. I remember when Aquaman was barely above peak/slight superhuman in strength.

More =/= better, though.

And no, he hasn't been at that level for years now. He just was portrayed really inconsistently for a time. Post mid-90s though, he's been a multi-tonner by a fair bit.

Originally posted by tkitna
I looked at the Spidey feats and cant see anything that Arthur would struggle with. This thread seems silly to me. Why isnt it obvious to everybody that Aquaman is stronger?

Because god-forbid Aquaman was actually useful for something other than talking to fish.

In all honesty though, his feats just aren't that well known.

Originally posted by -Pr-
More =/= better, though.

And no, he hasn't been at that level for years now. He just was portrayed really inconsistently for a time. Post mid-90s though, he's been a multi-tonner by a fair bit.

and yet I still remember those years.
I just dont see his feats being that abundant yet and with the recent DCnU reboot.. Aquaman doesnt have the feats to compete.

going with aquaman.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Even if you wanted to argue that (though I don't agree), he still has feats I think Spider-Man would have trouble replicating.

Like using a crane as a bludgeoning tool, or knocking Martian Manhunter on his ass (twice), lifting a city block, throwing a bus at an Omac, supporting the weight of a building that was about to collapse, and the other stuff i mentioned of course.

Aquaman's strength is relatively more consistent than Spider-Man's, too. For all I know AM is stronger (know next to nothing about Arthur) but as far as feats go..

Like Parmaniac and Nietzschean been telling he either can or has replicated most of those feats. Throwing/catching buses or trucks, knocking class 100 on their asses, supporting collapsing building, while under water causing a huge warehouse to collapse and using a tank (not mini-tank but A tank) as a bludgeoning tool. As for punching Superboy that far Pete did simillar thing to Scorpion. And while Scorpion is no Superboy this is about weight, not strength.

What im saying is, if the feats you mentioned are Arthur's best then they're pretty close. Only thing that seems to be out of Pete's weightclass is lifting a city block. But I dont know context behind this feat. If Pete pulled it off it wouldnt be the first time he performed a (seemingly) class 100 feat.

Aquaman. How has this thread lasted 4 pages?

Aquaman's stronger, handily.

Aquaman stomps.

lol, Aquaman.

Such a stupidly underrated character.

Although Spiderman is my 2nd favourite character, after Hulk, i think that he may be second to Aquaman in strength. That being said, Pete is nothing to be sniffed at.

Aquaman is, without a doubt, a lot stronger.

I truly think Spider-Man is the safer bet on land, at least if telepathy is out of the equation and it was a comic.

Edit: Who's stronger? On paper, Aquaman, in practice/feats, not sure.

Aquaman's stronger.

As far as DCnU goes, even that Aquaman displayed a strength feat well beyond Spider-Man's ability.

The point is, it's not a stomp he's not facing Hulk or someone like that.

Peter's got crazy durability feats anyway as opposed to his strength.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Aquaman displayed a strength feat well beyond Spider-Man's ability.

?

Pr needs to hurry up with that respect thread, I don't think I've seen every best strength feat that Arthur has so I might not be doing him justice.

Yeah, he recently sealed an underwater trench by physically moving a mass of solid land underwater.

How is that beyond Spiderman's lifting feats?

It must be more impressive than it sounds.

I already argued about this feat because on panel (art) it wasn't THAT big.

Originally posted by Nietzschean
and yet I still remember those years.
I just dont see his feats being that abundant yet and with the recent DCnU reboot.. Aquaman doesnt have the feats to compete.

Remembering them doesn't make them valid.

As I said, quantity will always make more of an impact than quantity imo.

Originally posted by SamZED
For all I know AM is stronger (know next to nothing about Arthur) but as far as feats go..

Like Parmaniac and Nietzschean been telling he either can or has replicated most of those feats. Throwing/catching buses or trucks, knocking class 100 on their asses, supporting collapsing building, while under water causing a huge warehouse to collapse and using a tank (not mini-tank but A tank) as a bludgeoning tool. As for punching Superboy that far Pete did simillar thing to Scorpion. And while Scorpion is no Superboy this is about weight, not strength.

What im saying is, if the feats you mentioned are Arthur's best then they're pretty close. Only thing that seems to be out of Pete's weightclass is lifting a city block. But I dont know context behind this feat. If Pete pulled it off it wouldnt be the first time he performed a (seemingly) class 100 feat.

Those are the ones I had handy; I'm trying not to post too many until I get the thread up.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Peter's got crazy durability feats anyway as opposed to his strength.

I've found that Arthur is for the most part the same; he's shown as being genuinly tough rather than amazingly strong more often.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
I already argued about this feat because on panel (art) it wasn't THAT big.

I disagree, but for fairness:

http://s4d2.turboimagehost.com/t/11260561_aquaman_04_015.jpg http://s4d2.turboimagehost.com/t/11260564_aquaman_04_016.jpg http://s4d2.turboimagehost.com/t/11260566_aquaman_04_017.jpg

And here he is in the same issue ripping through an Atlantean ship:

http://s4d3.turboimagehost.com/t/11260574_aquaman_04_009.jpg http://s4d3.turboimagehost.com/t/11260577_aquaman_04_010.jpg

Some pre-reboot stuff:

Uses a crane as a bludgeoning tool:

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260470/Aquaman_032_page_13.jpg.html

Fights J'onn briefly (yes, J'onn):

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260472/Aquaman_V4_29_page_15.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260473/Aquaman_V4_29_page_16.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260474/Aquaman_V4_29_page_17.jpg.html

Fights J'onn again:

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260477/batman_confidential_50_027.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/11260478/batman_confidential_50_028.jpg.html

I'm trying not to upload too much until the thread is ready, as I don't want to spoil it too much. The city-block one was underwater, but after yesterday I really don't see people giving it much credit, so I omitted it.

In all honesty, if people think Spider-Man is stronger, then fair enough. I just don't agree, nor am I thinking that I will.

I always though Aquaman is somewhere between Class 25-50
and Spiderman Class 10-20

vin

Can Spider-Man talk to spiders?mmm

Sure, why not. Oh, and octopii.

After reading The Lame Unadventures of Aquaman (100% canon) I have no doubt that the bugboy stomps.

^
What Stilt said....he is an Aquaman expert...unlike Pr....who just makes fun of Arthur.

Totally...