Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Agreed.
Agreed
Umm Yes right, someone got "owned" and now posts in threads following me around.
GS has a poor imitation of Creshosk here, except Creshosk never resorted to this level of cheerleading and actually made good points.
No bearing on my argument or this thread. Irrelevant. Disappears comments stem from poor observation. He commented on something i never did as such your agreement too is not only naive but also irrelevant.
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Not really and energy was taken from the begining and end of time by Zemo to heal Genis. Read it again.
Whirly come on. Despite your previous comments suggesting otherwise im going to assume that we've both read the issue. Baron Zemo states that he was the responsible for Genis' present state and therefore for any potential destruction he might cause.
The reason being?
He healed Genis with matter from the Big Bang:
"My experience wielding the Moonstones was your undoing. I drew matter from the Big Bang that both began and ends our universe. It is that anomaly which created our predicament"
I believe that says it all.
Heres that scan again:
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=3/7716271233.jpg&s=x11
This also adds additional support to Galactus comments from Excalibur 61:
According to both Galactus and Baron Zemo the Big Bang is the be all and end all of creation. Its power births it, maintains it and ends it. There is no new energy introduced to this closed system, just the power of the Big Bang. By using the matter from the Big Bang Genis was made one with the past and the present and the future as stated by Zemo. He was collapsing photonic activity in all of those eras via this connection.
Retcon? Nah!
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
No it isn't and anyone on these forums for any time knows that.
You have told us numerous times Phoenix replaces all other abstracts and the universal cycle is then stopped.
I have said no such thing. Phoenix brings about the end of the universe and co-ordinates the replacement of the abstracts at the end of the universe, but then she is also the Big Bang which births a new universe. While a universe may come to an end the creation cycle is a constant. A constant through a certain firebird
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=3/741443489.jpg&s=x11
Regardless this accusation is either a lie resultant from the collapse of your dead end argument or a most horrible misinterpretation.
Either way quote me and post a link to the appropriate thread or SHHHHH!!! You have nothing. But isnt that always the case?
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
As for the old geezer comments, it's just a bit sad that you have to resort to them to draw attention away from the lie.
Its quite obvious that the only lies to be found around here stem from yourself. Until you support your OPINION with sufficient evidence i need do no more but
and
Bye bye.