Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

would u rather world of warcraft 2 or a warcaft 4

i would rather a warcraft 4

World of Warcraft is still new and evolving, making a sequel would be pointless.

Warcraft 4 would be better, but honestly, the whole Warcraft series needs a break, Starcraft 2 would be best, I think. Followed by Diablo 3.

diablo 3 would be nice..but how the hell are they gonna pull that off...diablo and his bros. got pwned badly..i doubt they're comin back

He's satan, he can do anything.

I agree wit BF, deffently a Diablo game before any new warcraft, start craft would also be nice

Yeah

Originally posted by MadMel
diablo 3 would be nice..but how the hell are they gonna pull that off...diablo and his bros. got pwned badly..i doubt they're comin back it would most likely be 'before' diablo 1... where you can choose to side with heaven or hell .. something like that... "The Sin War"
era... but honestly.. seeing how world of warcraft is coming along.. they'd just screw up diablo...

I'd rather have StarCraft II before anything else.

Originally posted by BackFire
World of Warcraft is still new and evolving, making a sequel would be pointless.

Warcraft 4 would be better, but honestly, the whole Warcraft series needs a break, Starcraft 2 would be best, I think. Followed by Diablo 3.

I quite agree...although I would probably pass on Starcraft....never got into it...

i disagree warcraft is better than starcraft but diablo and warcraft are evenly matched i would rather warcraft

( cause its the only one im good at )

Bring Starcraft back.

Oh wait, they are:

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/worldofstarcraft/news.html?sid=6146918

Originally posted by Red Superfly
Bring Starcraft back.

Oh wait, they are:

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/worldofstarcraft/news.html?sid=6146918

it was added april 1st... -_-

Originally posted by Red Superfly
Bring Starcraft back.

Oh wait, they are:

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/worldofstarcraft/news.html?sid=6146918

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
it would most likely be 'before' diablo 1... where you can choose to side with heaven or hell .. something like that... "The Sin War"
era...
if diablo was set in the sin war era, that'd sweet...
Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
but honestly.. seeing how world of warcraft is coming along.. they'd just screw up diablo...
i'd doubt that, i have good faith in blizzard...

oh and why would they have a sequal to WOW when the burning crusade expansion is coming out????

sequels to mmo's are usually like 10 years apart heh

Does anyone know if blizzard is going to impliment the hero classes in the expansion?... I really wanna change my paladin into a templar...

not always...city of villains is a sequal to city of heroes. they were only a few years apart..

I duno.. that seems more like an expansion to me.. a sequel has entirely new 'never before seen' contents

cov is a stand alone sequal..u dont need coh to play it..

yes its stand alone.. but it compliments CoH and vice versa in the same way that an expansion would... whereas if it were city of heroes 2... it might have a totally different game engine, resulting in a totally different feel... elderscrolls is a very good example of what a sequel is... as is the leap from diablo to diablo 2

I believe the jump from lineage 1 to lineage 2 also took more than 5 years (2d to 3d)

hmm true..