Originally posted by Hell Lancer
i didn't resurrect that thread nor did i start the flaming. you're blind
And your talking about my bad memory...
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
kagura's words. fail.
speaking of proofs, i think you're the last person to talk....given you're epic fail in Ryu/Jin thread when you said "show me Jin beating Kuma easily" when the prologue directly STATES that he did it.
when are you going to grow up, darkman?
Hah, so we are going to use yet ANOTHER obscure statement to try and justify a non existant feat?
I never failed in that thread dude, I left because I had Rl issues to deal with, such as work.
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
the guy has more veractiy that you ever will. it's not about doing your own research as much as it's about knowing which source to quote. i'm quoting a well-known and well-respected and possibly the most damn accurate source on SF...as opposed to listening to some obscure Aussie dude on sporadic hissy fits.
and stop calling me Sado.
Firstly, reported for Racism. And the fact that you know my country of origin proves that you are Sado, since i don't recall telling you where I'm from, but I do remember telling Sado.
Secondly, Your the one quoting obscure sources, and your using another dudes research, you have precisely 0% first hand knowlege of anything your saying. you my friend, have absolutely no right to decide who is more accurate.
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
that was hilarious and you know it!
Meaningless.
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSncCqZcgPQ&feature=related
speaking of your minimal veracity: Charlie was in the gunship, genius, watch the ending again! hahaha! what a fail!
Absolute fail... Charlie was in a bloody Harrier in his SFA3 ending you blatant fool. I was reffering to his SFA2 ending... Read my posts properly!
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
so...the fact that he gets shot is your proof that he (and Guile and Chunli) can evade gunfire?
EPIC fail.
The fact that they where not absolutely reduced to paste and their clothes full of bullet holes attest to this... Where is your proof K' evaded gunfire?
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
rubbish. the only soldiers we see in the entire game are barehanded fighters like Juri and Juni. so for all your "woulda coulda shoulda" we SEE K' taking armed fighters head on in KofMI2. we don't see shite in SFA3.
yet another epic fail.
Right, because Shadaloo is made up of 13 dolls, and the grand masters... Oh wait... Your wrong again. MY BAD!
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
you know what, I can see why you're being confused. what i mean by "firepower" is literally, the power of flames. there is nothing in the SF canon or in the list of (exaggerated, misconstrued or fanfictional) feats that Bison or Akuma have that shows they are capable of vaporizing someone. from tiamat's source, the shakuunetsu hadouken can burn very badly but it's not capable of vaping someone.
so really, my sources are fine. if i were you, i'd be more worried about your horrendous failures with your logic (a term i'm using extremely loosely right now) for Charlie being capable of dodging gunfire and then making it even worse by saying Guile and Chunli can do it too just because Charlie did it...only he never really did and in fact got shot.
frankly, i think you need help.
read above, you horrendous moron, all 3 where invading shadaloo bases, and 2 of them are experienced military combatants, that already have high speed feats and techniques. Your horrendously misunderstanding the original sources and instead choose to act on tiamat's plot guide, a guide made by a fan and has no more canon capability than any other fanmade work. Which is now outdated in any case. in any event, None of the flame users have flames, reduced to ashes, and with the exeption of perhaps Iori, have never actually killed anyone.
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
never happened, canonically. fail.
back this statement up, or go away. And no, Tiamat's "interpretation" of events is no more valid than mine, and you saying "I'll take his word over yours" is not a rebuttal. you have to back your oppinion with actual evidence.
Originally posted by Hell Lancer
so you don't have proof that he did. good to know.
you have no proof to the contrary, and since it's a mainstay technique, my position is far stronger than yours.