Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Superman
Aquaman
Wonder Woman
Flash
Batman
Cyborg

vs

Endgame Thanos with his sword
Corvus Glaive
Proxima Midnight
Ebony Maw
Cull Obsidian

Fight takes place in the Avengers HQ's ruins.

Thanos solos.

Superman solos.

Justice League wins.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Superman solos. The guy failedcto beat Bruce Wayne with prep. His own mother was on the line. Thanos would make him cry to Martha. Facts>your opinion.

Thanos was getting molested by Wanda and Captain Marvel. He can't handle women, how is he supposed to fight a SuperMAN?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Thanos was getting molested by Wanda and Captain Marvel. He can't handle women, how is he supposed to fight a SuperMAN? He beat carol. He was fighting her with one arm.


Scarlet despite her power did not defeat Thanos. She hurt him but he still had her bested shoring how adaptable to any situation he finds himself in.

Superman cries like a girl is not a girl. He loses to men like Batman. Thanos beats him worse than Batman. Martha cannot save him this time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He beat carol. He was fighting her with one arm.


Scarlet despite her power did not defeat Thanos. She hurt him but he still had her bested shoring how adaptable to any situation he finds himself in.

Superman cries like a girl is not a girl. He loses to men like Batman. Thanos beats him worse than Batman. Martha cannot save him this time.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Thanos was getting molested by Wanda and Captain Marvel. He can't handle women, how is he supposed to fight a SuperMAN?

"It is MA'AM!!"

Legit though, Superman kills them all in a matter of seconds if he wants to. Maw is the only threat here besides the big bad himself, and he is a glass cannon, that the Flash could probably turn into mush with a superspeed shoulder check if he chooses to do so.

Mismatch. Superman solos with ease.

Hmmmm. Could go either way depending on how you match the different fighters.

I see a win for team Thanos in the following scenario:
Glaive takes on Cyborg
Proxima takes on Batman
Ebony takes on WW.
Black Dwarf on Aquaman
Thanos on Superman

Flash would be the serious issue, but Thanos can take both Flash and Superman without a doubt.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

but Thanos can take both Flash and Superman without a doubt.

Really?

Not even the slightest doubt on that?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Hmmmm. Could go either way depending on how you match the different fighters.

I see a win for team Thanos in the following scenario:
Glaive takes on Cyborg
Proxima takes on Batman
Ebony takes on WW.
Black Dwarf on Aquaman
Thanos on Superman

Flash would be the serious issue, but Thanos can take both Flash and Superman without a doubt.

You foolish child. Superman wins

Unfair matchup. JL have 6 members and the BO has 5? JL stomps because of Superman and numbers advantage. Remove Superman and BO wins though not easily.

Without Superman, JL gets viciously stomped

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You foolish child. Superman wins

Ohh leave it Broly. Your word carries no weight. You were afraid to take on Quanchi's BZ challenge.

You are a joke!

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Without Superman, JL gets viciously stomped And without the Justice League, Superman would still stomp.

I don't think he would stomp, but I think he could win.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Ohh leave it Broly. Your word carries no weight. You were afraid to take on Quanchi's BZ challenge.

You are a joke!

What are you talking about you foolish child?

Besides the fact that Superman wins

Originally posted by NemeBro
And without the Justice League, Superman would still stomp. Just like against Batman. Get real. The guy did not even solo Steppenwolf or DD.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
What are you talking about you foolish child?

Besides the fact that Superman wins

The BZ challenge in the MDF. You said you were gonna BZ Quan, but it was all a joke, as Quan unveiled.

Your word is a sham.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He beat carol. He was fighting her with one arm.


Scarlet despite her power did not defeat Thanos. She hurt him but he still had her bested shoring how adaptable to any situation he finds himself in.

Superman cries like a girl is not a girl. He loses to men like Batman. Thanos beats him worse than Batman. Martha cannot save him this time.

He was overpowered by Carol. He needed the stone to save himself.

Funny you mention crying because Thanos was literally begging for help when Wanda was up his ass.

Can Thanos cut Superman?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The BZ challenge in the MDF. You said you were gonna BZ Quan, but it was all a joke, as Quan unveiled.

Your word is a sham.


What are those 2 cousins or something, and their Moms wont let them fight?

Originally posted by Juk3n
Can Thanos cut Superman?

Maybe. Maybe not. It doesn't really matter since he's way too slow hit him.

Originally posted by Psychotron
He was overpowered by Carol. He needed the stone to save himself.

Funny you mention crying because Thanos was literally begging for help when Wanda was up his ass. He had one arm. He still beat her in an unprecedented he used the power stone by holding it whereas it kills or severely hurts most others unless they put it on an intimate object. One arm he tossed her and despite all her power and using it on Thanos he still defeated her when she came back.

Thanos still in his situation assessed it and won. The guy truly is the best. Superman had his gf save his life against Batman.

Originally posted by Juk3n
Can Thanos cut Superman? Of course he can. WWs sword can cut a Doomsday limb off and he is more powerful and durable than Superman.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Maybe. Maybe not. It doesn't really matter since he's way too slow hit him. WW hit him, Batman hit him. Cyborg hit him. Doomsday hit him. Watch the films the version of Superman you worship does not exist.

Originally posted by Juk3n
Can Thanos cut Superman?

Definitely

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Definitely



I assume you have evidence given how Youve basically stated that as a fact.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I assume you have evidence given how Youve basically stated that as a fact.

Ofcourse. Doomsday was cut by a much inferior sword.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Ofcourse. Doomsday was cut by a much inferior sword.


Doomsday isnt Superman. Not even a full Kryptonian.

Try again.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Doomsday isnt Superman. Not even a full Kryptonian.

Try again.

Seriously? Doomsday is Kryptonian. Reason why they needed Kryptonite to kill him. Is there any reason to believe his skin is different from Supes?

If so, I dare to say that DD's skin is more durable than Supes. This is evident when we see Supe being boned by the Nuke while DD wasn't that much affected.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Seriously? Doomsday is Kryptonian. Reason why they needed Kryptonite to kill him. Is there any reason to believe his skin is different from Supes?

If so, I dare to say that DD's skin is more durable than Supes. This is evident when we see Supe being boned by the Nuke while DD wasn't that much affected.


Doomsday was a hybrid. Lex put his blood in the mix.

But hey if you wanna play it like that then Kryptonians regenerate and adapt the way Doomsday does

🤔 Was that durability of skin. Or just part of Doomsday power set, a power set that Superman doesn't share. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Doomsday was a hybrid. Lex put his blood in the mix.

But hey if you wanna play it like that then Kryptonians regenerate and adapt the way Doomsday does

Zod's body was used for creating DD. That includes his skin.

To me it was clear that DD was superior to Supes in every way. I don't see reason to believe that Superman's skin is tougher.

Again, the Nuke clearly had a greater effect on Supes.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

To me it was clear that DD was superior to Supes in every way.


Thats clearly not true given how DD could not fly and didnt have the speed and reflexes to leave Wonder Woman as a statue.


Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

Again, the Nuke clearly had a greater effect on Supes.


Yeah but a Nuke is a lot more than just brunt force. Its massive amounts of heat and radiation. And thats especially true in Space as you yourself previously pointed out to me.

Youre also neglecting how Wonder Womans weapons tend to be magical in nature.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Thats clearly not true given how DD could not fly and didnt have the speed and reflexes to leave Wonder Woman as a statue.





Yeah but a Nuke is a lot more than just brunt force. Its massive amounts of heat and radiation. And thats especially true in Space as you yourself previously pointed out to me.

Youre also neglecting how Wonder Womans weapons tend to be magical in nature.

Doesn't matter. DD's skin proved to be more durable. In the same case, what suggestion is there that Superman's limb wouldn't be amputated?

Don't know buddy, I bet Thanos' Infinity Sword would shatter Diana's sword.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Doesn't matter. DD's skin proved to be more durable. In the same case, what suggestion is there that Superman's limb wouldn't be amputated?


When was DDs skin proven more durable to blunt physical attacks?

The suggestion would be that Superman can go crashing from the sky through a mountain without a scar, bruise or bleed to show for it. Completely undamaged.


Originally posted by Josh_Alexander


Don't know buddy, I bet Thanos' Infinity Sword would shatter Diana's sword.

I agree his sword had better feats, and that hes stronger than her.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
When was DDs skin proven more durable to blunt physical attacks?

The suggestion would be that Superman can go crashing from the sky through a mountain without a scar, bruise or bleed to show for it. Completely undamaged.




I agree his sword had better feats, and that hes stronger than her.

Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He had one arm. He still beat her in an unprecedented he used the power stone by holding it whereas it kills or severely hurts most others unless they put it on an intimate object. One arm he tossed her and despite all her power and using it on Thanos he still defeated her when she came back.

Thanos still in his situation assessed it and won. The guy truly is the best. Superman had his gf save his life against Batman.

Conveniently forgetting that she no sold his headbutt and made him shit his pants, eh? Carol > Thanos in strength and durability.

Crying out for help is assessing a situation? You are pathetic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

Your getting owned as usual

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast bring in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman have him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different bring with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast being in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman gave him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different being with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.


^ Corrected some words, as there were quite a few misspells and auto corrects gone wrong.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Your getting owned as usual

You are being stupid, as usual.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast bring in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman have him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different bring with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.

Overall, you are basing your entire case on PURE SPECULATION, as it's usual of you.

Unless you have specific proof that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's, stop giving attributes without evidence.

The facts are the facts, you can like them or you cannot, they won't change based on your preferences!

DD endured the nuke better than Superman did, which means, his skin is tougher!

Prove that Superman's skin is stronger than DD's, or he is getting amputated by Thanos' IS.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Overall, you are basing your entire case on PURE SPECULATION, as it's usual of you.

Unless you have specific proof that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's, stop giving attributes without evidence.

The facts are the facts, you can like them or you cannot, they won't change based on your preferences!

DD endured the nuke better than Superman did, which means, his skin is tougher!

Prove that Superman's skin is stronger than DD's, or he is getting amputated by Thanos' IS.


What kind of meltdown is this?

No rebuttal of any of my points, just a complete meltdown.

All the Nuke proves is that Doomsday skin is better at enduring heat and radiation. But not necessarily physical impact.

On top Superman had suffered kryptonite poisoning in his prior fight and still had the scar from the kryptonite weapon.

And again On top its pretty evident Wonder Womans weapons are magical.

@ 1:30 notice how Wonder Womans sword glows up as it slices through the statue:

https://youtu.be/uC9qU3X1JgM

It does the same when she cuts Doomsday. So not directly comparable with Thanos sword.

So youve proven nothing (as per usual). Try again Josh.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What kind of meltdown is this?

No rebuttal of any of my points, just a complete meltdown.

All the Nuke proves is that Doomsday skin is better at enduring heat and radiation. But not necessarily physical impact.

On top Superman had suffered kryptonite poisoning in his prior fight and still had the scar from the kryptonite weapon.

And again On top its pretty evident Wonder Womans weapons are magical.

@ 1:30 notice how Wonder Womans sword glows up as it slices through the statue:

https://youtu.be/uC9qU3X1JgM

It does the same when she cuts Doomsday. So not directly comparable with Thanos sword.

So youve proven nothing (as per usual). Try again Josh.

Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's

It ain't that hard D.Thor. Unless you have evidence that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's, you can't give attributes to characters just for the sake of it.

We don't know how weak Superman was. Yes, he previously encountered Kryptonite, that doesn't mean that his body was still weak! Unless you can prove that Superman's body was still weak, you can keep speculating boy.

MORE SPECULATION


WW's sword has no feats on it's own, nor was it ever stated to be some sort of special sword for cutting Kryptonian abominations.

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's

It ain't that hard D.Thor. Unless you have evidence that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's, you can't give attributes to characters just for the sake of it.

We don't know how weak Superman was. Yes, he previously encountered Kryptonite, that doesn't mean that his body was still weak! Unless you can prove that Superman's body was still weak, you can keep speculating boy.

MORE SPECULATION


WW's sword has no feats on it's own, nor was it ever stated to be some sort of special sword for cutting Kryptonian abominations.

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic.

Well WW sword has been confirmed as magic in nature if you take the Bvs Tech Manual book as canon.

And didnt Doomsday technically shed his old skin and regenerate new skin? So was his durability great or his regenerative features?

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Well WW sword has been confirmed as magic in nature if you take the Bvs Tech Manual book as canon.

And didnt Doomsday technically shed his old skin and regenerate new skin? So was his durability great or his regenerative features?

Magical in what aspect? Does it state that it has some special cutting properties or that it is specifically meant to amputate Kriptonian behemoths?

All I'm saying is that there is 0 evidence to suggest that Superman's skin is stronger than Doomsday's.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's



I dont need to. Hes a different being. What part of that do you not understand? Was it not visually evident enough for you?

Now Youve made the claim that Thanos sword would definitely cut Superman, so the Onus is on you to prove that.


Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic.

What bias? Lol

I was simply questioning your definitive statement. To which you have responded with multiple meltdowns.

Ignoring the "is he more durable than DD" the fact that a nuke didn't splatter supes body to pieces is a huge durability feat for him, whether or not he survived it.

And was he even truly dead or in a coma-like state? I remember at the end of the movie wasn't shit levitating by his grave?

EDIT: Just confirmed, yup dirt levitates on his coffin. Dude wasn't dead. He survived a nuke, but it put him in a coma.

Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous

Even if it would, Superman could just snatch it away from him with his speed. Then decapitate him with it.

Yep, that sounds like something super-murderman would do.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I dont need to. Hes a different being. What part of that do you not understand? Was it not visually evident enough for you?

Now Youve made the claim that Thanos sword would definitely cut Superman, so the Onus is on you to prove that.




What bias? Lol

I was simply questioning your definitive statement. To which you have responded with multiple meltdowns.

What part of stop giving attributes without evidence don't you understand?

If you want to say that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's which endured a similar attack better, then prove it.

I don't need to prove the obvious, Thanos' sword>>>>>>>>>> WW's

Originally posted by Surtur
Even if it would, Superman could just snatch it away from him with his speed. Then decapitate him with it.

Snatching it away would require for him to grab something Thanos is grabing. In that point, it's not a matter of speed but of strength.

In that point, Thanos would outpower Superman.

Superman is stronger than Thanos.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yep, that sounds like something super-murderman would do.

The only hope for Thanos is to say his moms name is Martha, but I doubt he'll have time.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Snatching it away would require for him to grab something Thanos is grabing. In that point, it's not a matter of speed but of strength.

In that point, Thanos would outpower Superman.

I'm not sure why you think Thanos would be gripping his weapon with all his might. He won't have time to brace himself and strengthen his grip. I mean you know you're not supposed to grip weapons like that, right?

Superman > Thanos wet dream

Being murdered by Superman is an honor. He'll mourn you afterwards.

Superman doesn't mourn because he feels bad about murdering people, he's mourning that he can only kill people once. he'd probably love to get ahold of the time stone. so that he can resurrect people and kill them over and over.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not sure why you think Thanos would be gripping his weapon with all his might. He won't have time to brace himself and strengthen his grip. I mean you know you're not supposed to grip weapons like that, right?

Thanos' reflexes were fast enough to not only react to IM's multiple propulsors, but to spin his sword fast enough to block all of the beams.

I don't see why you think Superman will be able to breach Thanos' defenses.

Specially when considering that Thanos managed to go toe to toe with Captain Marvel, who in turn can travel intergalactic distances in hours.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Superman doesn't mourn because he feels bad about murdering people, he's mourning that he can only kill people once. he'd probably love to get ahold of the time stone. so that he can resurrect people and kill them over and over.

Just wait until he figures out he can reverse time by flying fast. Awful.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanos' reflexes were fast enough to not only react to IM's multiple propulsors, but to spin his sword fast enough to block all of the beams.

I don't see why you think Superman will be able to breach Thanos' defenses.

Specially when considering that Thanos managed to go toe to toe with Captain Marvel, who in turn can travel intergalactic distances in hours.

Doesn't really compare to Supermans speed, where he can move so fast others appear as statues.

Originally posted by Surtur
Doesn't really compare to Supermans speed, where he can move so fast others appear as statues.

Why? Because Marvel doesn't use slow motion effects? A movie doesn't have to show slow motion in order for it to portray superspeeds.

I'm not arguing that Superman has the speed advantage, but that Thanos won't really be defenseless against this.

Originally posted by Surtur
Just wait until he figures out he can reverse time by flying fast. Awful.

It'd be like watching a 12 year old playing GTA V.

What are you talking about?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Why? Because Marvel doesn't use slow motion effects? A movie doesn't have to show slow motion in order for it to portray superspeeds.

I'm not arguing that Superman has the speed advantage, but that Thanos won't really be defenseless against this.

Not all slow motion effects are the same though. Marvel has used them, but not in the MCU. Remember the first Spiderman movie from like 2001? There is that scene in the school where everything goes slow motion. We see objects still moving, but they are moving slowly.

Other times when slow motion effects are used no objects at all are moving. You see it a lot on Smallville.

And all we have to compare it to is Thanos reacting to an energy blast of unknown speed.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanos' reflexes were fast enough to not only react to IM's multiple propulsors, but to spin his sword fast enough to block all of the beams.

I don't see why you think Superman will be able to breach Thanos' defenses.

Specially when considering that Thanos managed to go toe to toe with Captain Marvel, who in turn can travel intergalactic distances in hours.


Honestly im confused why you and Quan are not best pals.

Even more confused why Quan and Broly are buddies

Originally posted by Surtur
Not all slow motion effects are the same though. Marvel has used them, but not in the MCU. Remember the first Spiderman movie from like 2001? There is that scene in the school where everything goes slow motion. We see objects still moving, but they are moving slowly.

Other times when slow motion effects are used no objects at all are moving. You see it a lot on Smallville.

And all we have to compare it to is Thanos reacting to an energy blast of unknown speed.


MCU has used slow motion effects with Quicksilver.

And Cap was in super slow motion. Yet he can fight Thanos.

Heck even Thor was moving in slow motion. And Thor and Thanos disarmed each other in armed combat. So their speed should be on the same level.

Regarding Captain Marvel, her flight speed inside a vacuum and inside an atmosphere appear to be different, unless people think Thanos can throw his sword at FTL speeds. During the final battle, when she is going for the van portal with the IG, Thanos throws his sword from behind her and still hits the van before she can reach it. And considering the context of the scene, it's safe to assume she was going as fast as she could. However, it could also be argued that that is PIS, seeing as she covered a much greater distance in a similar amount of time when she initially arrives.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Honestly im confused why you and Quan are not best pals.

Even more confused why Quan and Broly are buddies

Please D.Thor. Stop it, will you? You know the forum's rules, you can't give attributes to characters without the basis of evidence.

There is no indicator that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's and ergo, no evidence to suggest that Diana couldn't amputate Superman's limbs.

Diana's sword, although magical, has no special attributes besides glowing, nor any feats to suggest it is more powerful than Thanos' IS.

Originally posted by Surtur
Not all slow motion effects are the same though. Marvel has used them, but not in the MCU. Remember the first Spiderman movie from like 2001? There is that scene in the school where everything goes slow motion. We see objects still moving, but they are moving slowly.

Other times when slow motion effects are used no objects at all are moving. You see it a lot on Smallville.

And all we have to compare it to is Thanos reacting to an energy blast of unknown speed.

All I'm saying is that the fact that Marvel barely uses Slow Mo doesn't mean his characters are slower than DC's.

Take WW for instance, we clearly see slow motion scenes of her blocking bullets, whereas we don't get slow motion scenes of guys like Thor, Hela, Captain America or other high skill fighters who constantly block, dodge and avoid way faster and more powerful attacks like beams of energy, etc.

So, I concede that Thanos is slower, but I won't concede that he will be rendered useless by Superman. If Superman lowers his guard, as he usually does, he will be defeated.

They are faster than a bullet, I can be certain of that.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
All I'm saying is that the fact that Marvel barely uses Slow Mo doesn't mean his characters are slower than DC's.

Take WW for instance, we clearly see slow motion scenes of her blocking bullets, whereas we don't get slow motion scenes of guys like Thor, Hela, Captain America or other high skill fighters who constantly block, dodge and avoid way faster and more powerful attacks like beams of energy, etc.

So, I concede that Thanos is slower, but I won't concede that he will be rendered useless by Superman. If Superman lowers his guard, as he usually does, he will be defeated.

They are faster than a bullet, I can be certain of that.

I think it's mostly PIS. But considering how much force Thanos can deliver, that sword should be flying pretty fast.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I think it's mostly PIS.Sorry, but I don't accept low quality debating tactics in my thread.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Please D.Thor. Stop it, will you? You know the forum's rules, you can't give attributes to characters without the basis of evidence.

There is no indicator that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's and ergo, no evidence to suggest that Diana couldn't amputate Superman's limbs.

Diana's sword, although magical, has no special attributes besides glowing, nor any feats to suggest it is more powerful than Thanos' IS.




1) The fact that her sword glows means any comparisons to Thanos's sword are not completely reliable.

2) The fact that Superman was infected by Kryptonite means any comparisons between Superman and Doomsday reaction to the Nuke are not completely reliable.

3) The fact that the Nuke was mostly heat and radiation makes any comparisons to getting struck by Thanos's sword unreliable.

4) For the record, Diana's sword and shield do have some decent feats, and neither have been shown to be breakable so far. And neither has Superman's skin through pure brute force (sans Kryptonite).

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Sorry, but I don't accept low quality debating tactics in my thread.

Then lets just safely assume she didn't want to fly that fast or wasn't focused.

Thanos has no way to hit Superman. Quit dodging.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) The fact that her sword glows means any comparisons to Thanos's sword are not completely reliable.

2) The fact that Superman was infected by Kryptonite means any comparisons between Superman and Doomsday reaction to the Nuke are not completely reliable.

3) The fact that the Nuke was mostly heat and radiation makes any comparisons to getting struck by Thanos's sword unreliable.

4) For the record, Diana's sword and shield do have some decent feats, and neither have been shown to be breakable so far. And neither has Superman's skin through pure brute force (sans Kryptonite).

1) Since when something that glows means it can cut better? Based on feats Thanos' sword》 WWs

2) That still doesn't show that Superman's skin is tougher than DDs

3) DD was cut.

4) Not as much as Thanos' sword.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Thanos has no way to hit Superman. Quit dodging.

Superman has poor battle tactics and tends to massively underestimate.

If he lowers his guard, Thanos will defeat him.

Nope

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) Since when something that glows means it can cut better? Based on feats Thanos' sword》 WWs

2) That still doesn't show that Superman's skin is tougher than DDs

3) DD was cut.

4) Not as much as Thanos' sword.

1) Does Thanos sword emit heat? No? Moot comparison then.

2) Moot point. This is about Thanos sword vs Supermans skin. Its like me saying Iron Mans kick cut Thanos, and Supermans punches have wayyy better feats than Iron Mans kick, therefore Superman one shots Thanos

Are you beginning to see how ridiculous your argument is yet?

3) Moot point. See above

4) Really? Has Thanos sword taken a small nuke energy blast like the one emitted from Doomsday? Because Wonder Womans Shield And Supermans skin has.

See how ridiculous this is getting?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) Does Thanos sword emit heat? No? Moot comparison then.

2) Moot point. This is about Thanos sword vs Supermans skin. Its like me saying Iron Mans kick cut Thanos, and Supermans punches have wayyy better feats than Iron Mans kick, therefore Superman one shots Thanos

Are you beginning to see how ridiculous your argument is yet?

3) Moot point. See above

4) Really? Has Thanos sword taken a small nuke energy blast like the one emitted from Doomsday? Because Wonder Womans Shield And Supermans skin has.

See how ridiculous this is getting?

1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?

2) The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit scratched Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!

I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?

Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!

Stop strawmanning boy.

3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies

4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.



I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?

Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?

2) The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit scratched Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!

I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?

Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!

Stop strawmanning boy.

3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies

4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.



I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?

Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads.

None of that is true, idiot

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
None of that is true, idiot

I'm debating D.Thor, your opinion is not required, child.

Stop derailing the thread.

Your opinions are irrelevant

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Your opinions are irrelevant

You are a confessed Superman fanboy. Your word has no weight for this thread.

Now, go find your toys, pathetic boy.

Your opinions are irrelevant

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Your opinions are irrelevant

Then why are you replying moron?

Okay, I'll just wait for D.Thor's response. Bye, Superman stalker.

Says the Thanos fanboy

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1) What does heat have to do in here!? What are you even talking about!?

2) The amount of lame assertions you can produce is astonishing. The fact that Mk 50 suit, which is actually an insanely strong suit scratched Thanos doesn't mean a punch from Superman is one-shotting him!

I know you tend to say stupidites when Thor is concerned. Have you turned a Superman fanboy now too?

Besides, what does Thanos' skin have to do in anything here? We are debating the fact that Superman won't endure a blow from Thanos' IS, not otherwise!

Stop strawmanning boy.

3) Prove Superman's skin>>> DD, or swallow your fallacies

4) Thanos was taking alien explosions in the back, repelling IM's blasters and enduring Thor's lightning.



I'm going to use Thor against you. Are you saying that DD's radiation waves>>>> Thor's direct lightning strikes?

Let's use your fanboyism against you. Because if that's the case, then Thor has 0 chance of facing Superman, and OHH BOY that means we are going to have to reopen some threads.


1) Point is you are comparing apples to oranges. You need to start making more relevant and cohesive arguments. But then If you did that, you wouldnt be claiming Thanos cutting Superman as a definitive statement.

2) I was actually showing you what an apples to oranges comparison looks like. But if you want to go there, of course Superman can scratch harder than Iron Mans foot. Heck IW Iron Man couldnt even take Cull.

Not a fanboy. Just being Objective. You should try it sometime.

3) Again moot point. When will you comprehend we are discussing Thanos sword cutting Superman, and not Doomsday vs Superman. You should take the Doomsday getting cut argument to the Doomsday vs Thanos thread.

4) Talking about Thanos Sword here, so no idea what taking Alien shots in the back is supposed to prove.
Hmm good question though, because Thanos sword took IMs repulsors amped by Thors Lightning. Point is though that WWs sword and shield have also been shown as unbreakable.
Moreover Wonder Womans sword wouldnt need the same feats, given it heats up upon cutting, making it a completely different attack. And for the millionth time equating Doomsday and Supermans durability is an Apples to Oranges comparison. As in its completely irrelevant.

Or perhaps im not a fanboy and just being Objective. You should try it sometime.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
1) Point is you are comparing apples to oranges. You need to start making more relevant and cohesive arguments. But then If you did that, you wouldnt be claiming Thanos cutting Superman as a definitive statement.

2) I was actually showing you what an apples to oranges comparison looks like. But if you want to go there, of course Superman can scratch harder than Iron Mans foot. Heck IW Iron Man couldnt even take Cull.

Not a fanboy. Just being Objective. You should try it sometime.

3) Again moot point. When will you comprehend we are discussing Thanos sword cutting Superman, and not Doomsday vs Superman. You should take the Doomsday getting cut argument to the Doomsday vs Thanos thread.

4) Talking about Thanos Sword here, so no idea what taking Alien shots in the back is supposed to prove.
Hmm good question though, because Thanos sword took IMs repulsors amped by Thors Lightning. Point is though that WWs sword and shield have also been shown as unbreakable.
Moreover Wonder Womans sword wouldnt need the same feats, given it heats up upon cutting, making it a completely different attack. And for the millionth time equating Doomsday and Supermans durability is an Apples to Oranges comparison. As in its completely irrelevant.

Or perhaps im not a fanboy and just being Objective. You should try it sometime.

1. WW's sword glowing doesn't automatically make it above Thanos' sword.

I'm not the one trying to prove that Superman's.skin is tougher than DD's. Burden of proof is on you.

2. Come on. You seriously underestimate the Mk50 suit. You forget that the much younger Mk6 suit was handling Thor!

On the other hand, what makes you so positive that a similar punch from the Mk50 suit won't make Superman bleed too?

3. So you concede WW's sword can cut Superman?

4. And where did you get that WW's sword heats when cutting? Is the thing some sort of lightsaber or what?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
All I'm saying is that the fact that Marvel barely uses Slow Mo doesn't mean his characters are slower than DC's.

Take WW for instance, we clearly see slow motion scenes of her blocking bullets, whereas we don't get slow motion scenes of guys like Thor, Hela, Captain America or other high skill fighters who constantly block, dodge and avoid way faster and more powerful attacks like beams of energy, etc.

So, I concede that Thanos is slower, but I won't concede that he will be rendered useless by Superman. If Superman lowers his guard, as he usually does, he will be defeated.

They are faster than a bullet, I can be certain of that.

Saying Thanos is faster than a bullet is based on pure fantasy. I'm not sure where you get the idea that the repulsor blasts(that we can clearly see on screen when fired) are faster than bullets.

Meanwhile Superman has a fight with another speedster at super speed while everyone around them is frozen. There will be no "he loses his guard" because there will be no need to guard. It will be over before Thanos realizes it. You're not grasping the speed difference here. Thanos will not have time to react. Especially when your best feat is that he barely reacted to a repulsor blast.

Superman could just take the sword and decapitate everyone with it. It'll be quick and painless.

Originally posted by Surtur
Saying Thanos is faster than a bullet is based on pure fantasy. I'm not sure where you get the idea that the repulsor blasts(that we can clearly see on screen when fired) are faster than bullets.

Meanwhile Superman has a fight with another speedster at super speed while everyone around them is frozen. There will be no "he loses his guard" because there will be no need to guard. It will be over before Thanos realizes it. You're not grasping the speed difference here. Thanos will not have time to react. Especially when your best feat is that he barely reacted to a repulsor blast.

Superman could just take the sword and decapitate everyone with it. It'll be quick and painless.

I never said that. That's pure cinematics, but I doubt Tony would resort to Propulsors if they were less effective than bullets.

Wonder Woman still manage to land some hits, so I don't know if that was PIS or, what we all know about Superman, he not fighting the smartest.

You are excluding character traits, Superman doesn't fight that way, as seen when he fought WW.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I never said that. That's pure cinematics, but I doubt Tony would resort to Propulsors if they were less effective than bullets.

Wonder Woman still manage to land some hits, so I don't know if that was PIS or, what we all know about Superman, he not fighting the smartest.

You are excluding character traits, Superman doesn't fight that way, as seen when he fought WW.
He did when he fought Steppenwolf, clown

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He did when he fought Steppenwolf, clown

Except Thanos is superior in every aspect to Steppenwolf, kid.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I never said that. That's pure cinematics, but I doubt Tony would resort to Propulsors if they were less effective than bullets.

Wonder Woman still manage to land some hits, so I don't know if that was PIS or, what we all know about Superman, he not fighting the smartest.

You are excluding character traits, Superman doesn't fight that way, as seen when he fought WW.

The blasters do pack more of a punch than a bullet. It doesn't mean they are faster than a bullet.

Originally posted by Surtur
The blasters do pack more of a punch than a bullet. It doesn't mean they are faster than a bullet.

Or the characters are just fast enough to block/dodge them. Not necessarily that the are slow, but that the heroes implicitly fast (no slow motion effects are applied to enhance it).

Also, bullets can't be seen because they don't emit light and therefore aren't that visible. Special ammo, like tracing bullets can be seen and that doesn't make them slower.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Conveniently forgetting that she no sold his headbutt and made him shit his pants, eh? Carol > Thanos in strength and durability.

Crying out for help is assessing a situation? You are pathetic. Her power kept her safe against a one armed Thanos who still defeated her despite the predicament he was in. He defeated her.


Being effective and winning is what matters in battle you ninny. Thanos was not in a fair one on one battle it was an endurance matchup after he beat multiple avengers. He still won.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous Dc bias reeks its ugly head. Deep down they know it would kill him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Her power kept her safe against a one armed Thanos who still defeated her despite the predicament he was in. He defeated her.


Being effective and winning is what matters in battle you ninny. Thanos was not in a fair one on one battle it was an endurance matchup after he beat multiple avengers. He still won.

Yes, her power made her stronger and tougher than Thanos. If it wasn't for the power gem she would have raped him like Wanda did. Glad we agree.

Thanos brought down a whole army and a bunch of space ships. He bombarded the Avengers before they knew he was coming and you're acting like he was the one at a disadvantage. The fact of the matter is that if you put Wanda and Thanos in a neutral setting with no outside interference she would kill him. So would Carol. It must be rough, having your favorite character jobbed to a couple of C-list Avengers.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Yes, her power made her stronger and tougher than Thanos. If it wasn't for the power gem she would have raped him like Wanda did. Glad we agree.

Thanos brought down a whole army and a bunch of space ships. He bombarded the Avengers before they knew he was coming and you're acting like he was the one at a disadvantage. The fact of the matter is that if you put Wanda and Thanos in a neutral setting with no outside interference she would kill him. So would Carol. It must be rough, having your favorite character jobbed to a couple of C-list Avengers. No, her power lost to a one armed and distracted Thanos. He still beat her. He was not fresh. He had one arm he still won. Nah, it is a stone not a gem you moron. Wanda lost. You can pretend she won but she did not.

The avengers had multiple armies come forward and charge first. Watch the film. Strange knew what was going to happen in IW for time travel. That was the only chance they had.

False. Speculation. Facts showed Thanos prevailed just as Batman prevailed over farm boy. Debate what did occur not your own silly little imagination station debating mind.

But Thanos didn't prevail. He got desintegrated by Iron Man.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
But Thanos didn't prevail. He got desintegrated by Iron Man. Thanos did in IW and Tony needed universal help, time travel, and the ig in a lucky attempt to take on Thanos. 1 out of 14 million chance with the universe against Thanos. No one ever overcame more opposition than Thanos. Ever.

Thanos already won. He is inevitable.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, her power lost to a one armed and distracted Thanos. He still beat her. He was not fresh. He had one arm he still won. Nah, it is a stone not a gem you moron. Wanda lost. You can pretend she won but she did not.

The avengers had multiple armies come forward and charge first. Watch the film. Strange knew what was going to happen in IW for time travel. That was the only chance they had.

False. Speculation. Facts showed Thanos prevailed just as Batman prevailed over farm boy. Debate what did occur not your own silly little imagination station debating mind.

He beat her with the power gem. Deny it all you want but we saw Thanos get scared when she no sold his bald ass. Wanda didn't lose either since she wasn't even knocked out. Thanos merely escaped her.

I watched the film. Thanos bombed them first or are you going to deny it?

Thanos died twice in one movie. He is a loser just like his fans.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Except Thanos is superior in every aspect to Steppenwolf, kid.

Steppenwolf has way better reaction feats to speedsters than Thanos.

Thanos never encountered a speedster, Steppenwolf encountered 3.

Originally posted by Psychotron
He beat her with the power gem. Deny it all you want but we saw Thanos get scared when she no sold his bald ass. Wanda didn't lose either since she wasn't even knocked out. Thanos merely escaped her.

I watched the film. Thanos bombed them first or are you going to deny it?

Thanos died twice in one movie. He is a loser just like his fans. It is the power stone this is not the comics. To use the stone pressed up against your skin would kill most but Thanos did so while she used her power. He was stunned but quickly assessed how to remedy the situation.

Bfrd is a loss. She went bye bye and needed Carol to save the lot of them.


The heroes charged Thanos before he pointed his sword forward marking the beginning of the fight. Thanos using his army to win is called intelligence. That is the point of ships and technology to use it to your advantage.


Thanos won over the entire universe. He is the villain in the biggest box office unadjusted film of all time. Superman is not even a part of the dceu anymore. No one cares because he is a loser.


Superman died despite a 3-1 advantage against a brainless goon with no skill whatsoever. No one cared either. The film was terrible.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is the power stone this is not the comics. To use the stone pressed up against your skin would kill most but Thanos did so while she used her power. He was stunned but quickly assessed how to remedy the situation.

Bfrd is a loss. She went bye bye and needed Carol to save the lot of them.


The heroes charged Thanos before he pointed his sword forward marking the beginning of the fight. Thanos using his army to win is called intelligence. That is the point of ships and technology to use it to your advantage.


Thanos won over the entire universe. He is the villain in the biggest box office unadjusted film of all time. Superman is not even a part of the dceu anymore. No one cares because he is a loser.


Superman died despite a 3-1 advantage against a brainless goon with no skill whatsoever. No one cared either. The film was terrible.
Stone, gem who cares about this nerd shit? Don't be that ackshually guy. We already know Thanos can withstand the effect of the stones. So what? He still needed one to beat Carol. Carol > vanilla Thanos.

And what would happen if it was her vs Thanos in a no BFR match in an empty arena? He'd get raped again. Search your feelings. You know it to be true.

Answer me. Did Thanos bomb them first?

Thanos got killed twice and his entire plant failed. He is a born loser. Both movies are childish garbage. Anyone who enjoys either of them is a manchild and a geek.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos did in IW and Tony needed universal help, time travel, and the ig in a lucky attempt to take on Thanos. 1 out of 14 million chance with the universe against Thanos. No one ever overcame more opposition than Thanos. Ever.

Thanos already won. He is inevitable.

How can getting turned to dust constitute a win to you?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Stone, gem who cares about this nerd shit? Don't be that ackshually guy. We already know Thanos can withstand the effect of the stones. So what? He still needed one to beat Carol. Carol > vanilla Thanos.

And what would happen if it was her vs Thanos in a no BFR match in an empty arena? He'd get raped again. Search your feelings. You know it to be true.

Answer me. Did Thanos bomb them first?

Thanos got killed twice and his entire plant failed. He is a born loser. Both movies are childish garbage. Anyone who enjoys either of them is a manchild and a geek. Well you are too dumb to see the difference between comics and movies. Kindly leave. Details matter, idiot.

No, he tossed her aside and already casually reacted and threw her aside. With her all out cheapshotting him he still wins with one arm.

He is more skilled, stronger, and more durable than she is.

After combat starts who cares? Should he not use the tools he has amassed? Do you realize how combat works?

Thanos already won. It is inevitable. A loser is someone who cannot beat a pissed off human. A loser is someone who needed another man to save his mommy. A loser is someone who needs the same guy that kicked your ass to reclaim your childhood home because the bank repossessed it. A loser who is someone whose face does not even show up in a cameo. A loser is someone who cries when you kill your fathers murderer who wanted to commit genocide. Need I go on?


Thanos won. Let it go.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
How can getting turned to dust constitute a win to you? He won in IW. That will never change. Thanos is inevitable.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He won in IW. That will never change. Thanos is inevitable. He won a fight dude.

But a millennia old Eternal lost the war to a 40 something human being. Condolences.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
He won a fight dude.

But a millennia old Eternal lost the war to a 40 something human being. Condolences. No, he won a few fights in the intro of the film. He beat Hulk, Thor, and Loki.


Thanos beat the avengers, gotg, wakanda, etc. Thanos already won, dummy. Tony Stark said Thanos mauled him.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Steppenwolf has way better reaction feats to speedsters than Thanos.

Thanos never encountered a speedster, Steppenwolf encountered 3.

2 Speedsters.

Superman won't run forever.

Superman carries Thanos into Space and drops him off then comes back and takes care of the rest of these clowns.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dc bias reeks its ugly head. Deep down they know it would kill him.


You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?


Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous


Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.

You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.

So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?





Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.

You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.

So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?

I have presented valid reasoning.

Thanos Sword》》》》WW's

Superman's skin = or 《 DD's.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?





Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.

You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.

So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield? Yes, he is not reasonable at all I get it.


Do you believe stormbreaker could kill Superman?

Originally posted by quanchi112

Do you believe stormbreaker could kill Superman?


I havent even given an opinion on Thanos sword cutting him or not. Again, I have questioned the notion, and not heard any reasonable justifications in response.


Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I have presented valid reasoning.

Thanos Sword》》》》WW's

Superman's skin = or 《 DD's.

facepalm

Except this is about Thanos Sword vs Supermans skin and has nothing to do with Wonder Woman and Doomsday.

So your logic is moot IMO.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well you are too dumb to see the difference between comics and movies. Kindly leave. Details matter, idiot.

No, he tossed her aside and already casually reacted and threw her aside. With her all out cheapshotting him he still wins with one arm.

He is more skilled, stronger, and more durable than she is.

After combat starts who cares? Should he not use the tools he has amassed? Do you realize how combat works?

Thanos already won. It is inevitable. A loser is someone who cannot beat a pissed off human. A loser is someone who needed another man to save his mommy. A loser is someone who needs the same guy that kicked your ass to reclaim your childhood home because the bank repossessed it. A loser who is someone whose face does not even show up in a cameo. A loser is someone who cries when you kill your fathers murderer who wanted to commit genocide. Need I go on?


Thanos won. Let it go.

Make me, pussy.

With the stone. He was getting overpowered before that.

Feats say otherwise. Carol no sold his attack and he looked scared.

The combat started with his fleet attacking them. And Thanos still managed to find a way to lose despite that surprise attack.

A loser is someone who dies twice in the same movie and has all of his plans foiled. Or someone who writes paragraphs defending that character.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Or the characters are just fast enough to block/dodge them. Not necessarily that the are slow, but that the heroes implicitly fast (no slow motion effects are applied to enhance it).

Also, bullets can't be seen because they don't emit light and therefore aren't that visible. Special ammo, like tracing bullets can be seen and that doesn't make them slower.

Lol wut.

A bullets speed indeed wouldn't be changed in your scenario, but that isn't the same as the energy blasts from Iron Man just being as fast(or faster) than bullets because...there is no legit reason provided. You just talk about special effects.

Those fast enough to react to a repulsor blast are just that: fast enough to react to a repulsor blast. If you want that feat to mean something you need to come show how fast those blasts actually are. You can't just assume they are as fast as bullets because why would you?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I havent even given an opinion on Thanos sword cutting him or not. Again, I have questioned the notion, and not heard any reasonable justifications in response.




facepalm

Except this is about Thanos Sword vs Supermans skin and has nothing to do with Wonder Woman and Doomsday.

So your logic is moot IMO. So you will dodge the question because it shows you are not being honest. Look if you want to pretend it might not to create a false narrative in wake of our battlezone at least have the guts to be honest about it.

So you ignore power scaling and dodge questions. If you do not have the integrity to answer questions or logically look at this issue please stop insulting the intelligence of those that do.

No, it is not but the fact you will not even answer speaks volumes about your integrity.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Make me, pussy.

With the stone. He was getting overpowered before that.

Feats say otherwise. Carol no sold his attack and he looked scared.

The combat started with his fleet attacking them. And Thanos still managed to find a way to lose despite that surprise attack.

A loser is someone who dies twice in the same movie and has all of his plans foiled. Or someone who writes paragraphs defending that character. By all means stick around and make an ass of yourself confusing the two.

He had one arm and he rectified the situation. Tossed her power the stone away casually and then beat her with it.

Thanos looked stunned but quickly capitalized. Who cares? Superman got beat by Batman. His gf looked scared right before he was going to kill him. Superman was not able to defend himself or even plead for his own life.

All armies were engaging it is fair combat. Without carol showing up. They lose. Without strange assessing time travel they lose. Without the rat freeing Lang they lose. Without all the various heroes attacking Thanos and trying to doglike him they lose.

Thanos already won in Iw. He killed half the universe. The movie says he won multiple times. He beat the avengers asses. Tony was scared of him. Thor was depressed for five years and cried at the mention of his name. The universe was traumatized by him. A loser is someone who cannot save his own mother or needs the same man who did get his house back. No wonder you love the guy so lame they gave not even made plans to bring him back since the general audience has rejected your weak hero.




Thanos is in the biggest box office film of all time your guys last film flopped.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise you are responding to a guy who agreed on page 1 that Supes might just solo this fight right?





Not saying it couldnt. Just questioning it. And not been convinced by Joshs argument.

You seem to think its a given because after multiple direct blows from it cut Caps shield.

So I have to ask, whats the best durability feat of Caps shield?


Just as good as any of Supermans feats aside from the Nuke. And it absorbs energy. I see your point, I just think Caps shield js more durable than Supermans foreskin

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Just as good as any of Supermans feats aside from the Nuke. And it absorbs energy. I see your point, I just think Caps shield js more durable than Supermans foreskin


Foreskin? Lol

At least youve put you think now. Anyone thinking that makes perfect sense to me.

Lol. Im just ****in around. Made a thread about it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol wut.

A bullets speed indeed wouldn't be changed in your scenario, but that isn't the same as the energy blasts from Iron Man just being as fast(or faster) than bullets because...there is no legit reason provided. You just talk about special effects.

Those fast enough to react to a repulsor blast are just that: fast enough to react to a repulsor blast. If you want that feat to mean something you need to come show how fast those blasts actually are. You can't just assume they are as fast as bullets because why would you?

There's no legit reason provided that a bullet is faster than blaster bolts or lasers either.

You have no prove either that an inferior weapon like a pistol's ammo would be able to hit Thanos whilst this one was blocking superior weaponry.

Speculation on both sides, except I think it's more logical that the superior weapon is indeed superior.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
There's no legit reason provided that a bullet is faster than blaster bolts or lasers either.

You have no prove either that an inferior weapon like a pistol's ammo would be able to hit Thanos whilst this one was blocking superior weaponry.

Speculation on both sides, except I think it's more logical that the superior weapon is indeed superior.

Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.

The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.

You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman.

A Mark 19 automatic grenade launcher is superior to a 9mm pistol. Guess which one has a higher velocity?

Nukes are so powerful I swear they probably travel at the speed of light.

I think I found this amazing feat Josh talks about:

zOR_lojBMEo

It's at 2:35. If you watch, you'll notice Iron Man begins firing blasts, prior to the blast Thanos blocks he fires a blast that misses. The next blast Thanos blocks. So it's not like he didn't know it was coming. I don't get why this means he can react to Superman. Maybe Josh is thinking of another feat.

Originally posted by Surtur
Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.

The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.

You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman. WW hit him with her shield, lasso, and her head.




Quit being dumb.

Originally posted by Surtur
Blaster bolts aren't as fast as bullets lol.

The fact is you're using a reaction feat to something that we can't even know for sure what the speed is in order to counter someone with a vast amount of speed in comparison.

You're stretching this dude. Thanos isn't gonna be able to react. This is why it is irrelevant if his weapons can cut Superman.

Based on what are blaster bolts slower than bullets?

Originally posted by Surtur
I think I found this amazing feat Josh talks about:

zOR_lojBMEo

It's at 2:35. If you watch, you'll notice Iron Man begins firing blasts, prior to the blast Thanos blocks he fires a blast that misses. The next blast Thanos blocks. So it's not like he didn't know it was coming. I don't get why this means he can react to Superman. Maybe Josh is thinking of another feat.

Even if you know a bullet is coming your way, you'll still be hit.

Besides, he still had to move his hands pretty fast to block all 6 beams.

Originally posted by quanchi112
WW hit him with her shield, lasso, and her head.




Quit being dumb.


facepalm

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Dont worry will rip this argument apart in our BZ. Oh you will ignore all kinds of evidence. I will be ready for it.

^ No Youve stayed your supposed evidence. And im telling you now it will be ripped apart.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ No Youve stayed your supposed evidence. And im telling you now it will be ripped apart. You will not see my argument coming. I know you think you do but you really do not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You will not see my argument coming. I know you think you do but you really do not.


Youve made it pretty clear with your very specific stips designed to aid your argument.

You dont even think theres any flaws in your above argument. Jeez im gonna destroy you.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Youve made it pretty clear with your very specific stips designed to aid your argument.

You dont even think theres any flaws in your above argument. Jeez im gonna destroy you.

Your bias is going down.