Deano
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/chaos.jpg
... CALCULATED COLLAPSE ...
Hello all ...
The news is filled at the moment with potential horror stories about the world economy and it all has a very familiar ring. Forget about the nonsense you hear from economists and business news correspondents about the 'economic cycle', it's all run like a military operation.
First of all, I should make the point, not that readers of these newsletters need telling, that the economic system is utterly, totally and completely, without any saving grace, insane to the point where nothing less than a padded cell is applicable.
Or, at least it would be if its intention was really to serve the interests of the human race and our shared environment. But, given that its entire structure is there to enslave the global population, the apparently insane morphs into the truly brilliant.
It may appear to be insane, for example, that a basic human need like a home should be considered an object of economic speculation to the extent that when the value goes up it is welcomed as a good thing and when it goes down it is disastrous.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/housing.jpg
If human need were the priority then keeping the cost of housing down would be the primary goal and, within that, would be a system of not charging interest on loans for main homes. Interest on money is a fraud anyway, because how can you charge people for borrowing what does not actually exist, except in theory?
Home loans could be granted in a sane and decent society with just an initial fee for the administration to pay for office and staff expenses and with that the cost of buying a home would plummet overnight with no interest to pay.
But that would empower, not enslave, and so it doesn't happen.
I have a little flat, which I love, on the Isle of Wight and its value goes up and down with the manipulations of the market. But am I alone in that I am glad when I hear that it is not going up in value? It's true. I consider an increase in property prices to be the last thing we need in the world I want to live in.
First of all, what use is the greater value to me when, unless I sell it and rent somewhere, any added value the flat has made will be gone if I buy something similar or bigger because all other properties will have increased in value too??
'It's wonderful, my house is worth so much more than when I bought it'. Yes, mate, and so is everyone else's. And what about the poor buggers who are trying to buy their first home and those with nowhere to live at all?
Oh sod them, eh? 'Ethel, pull up the ladder quick.'
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/propertysign.jpg
What tosh it all is, everything's topsy-turvy. What's good for fairness and justice is bad for the economy on every front and it's meant to be that way. When you charge interest on money you create in the very fabric of that system the human debris, or 'economic losers', that we see across the world.
The simple fact is this: When banks make a loan they 'create' on their computer screens (put into circulation) the amount of the loan. They do not create the interest that will have to be paid on that loan. This means that there is never enough 'money' in circulation to pay back all the principle and interest on the loans that have been made at every level of global society.
Unpayable debt, bankruptcy and economic catastrophe for the victims is built into the system - on purpose. This is how it works:
The economy goes up and down as demanded by the elite few who control it. Quite simply, there is a boom when money is poured into circulation and there's a bust when it is taken out.
Who controls how much money is in circulation? The banks do by how many loans they decide to make, because the issuing of credit 'loans' (money that has never, does not and will never literally exist) is how the overwhelming majority of what we call 'money' comes into circulation.
It may only be theoretical figures on computer screens as I have explained in my books and the newsletter headed 'Money Out Of Nothing' in the website archive. But these figures are used as units of exchange for goods and services and the fewer you have available the fewer goods and services can be bought. When that happens the economy goes on the slide.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/fatcat.jpg
It's a synch to control this when you have the power to decide how much 'money' you will create and circulate and, through your connected networks in government and the central bank, what interest your borrowers will pay. Lowering interest rates puts more money into circulation to be used to buy goods and services (increase economic activity and job opportunity) and putting interest rates up has the opposite effect because more of the peoples' money goes back to the banks.
What is the difference between an economic boom and an economic depression? One thing only - the amount of money in circulation. The banks control this and it allows them to create booms and busts at will. We are now in a time when they want to trigger an enormous economic collapse and that moment is getting closer by the week.
It is the same with the stock markets through which these families are moving trillions of dollars a day around the financial and banking system and deciding if they go up or down, soar or crash. Stock market crashes don't just happen, they are made to happen. Why would they do this when they have so much money invested in these markets? Well, if you know the crash is coming because you are going to cause it, you know to sell stocks at the highest point and buy them back once the crash has happened. In this way, you can increase your holdings massively by acquiring companies at a fraction of the cost before your manipulated collapse.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/nathan.jpg
Nathan Rothschild
The most blatant example of this was Nathan Rothschild during the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. The situation was simple: if England's Duke of Wellington won the battle the London Stock Exchange would soar, and if Napoleon, the French leader, prevailed it would collapse.
The Rothschilds ran an information and espionage operation renowned as the fastest in Europe with an extensive network of contacts that used codes and carrier pigeons to communicate secretly and quickly. This intelligence network would eventually develop into Mossad, the 'Israeli' intelligence arm today, as well as the CIA and the modern version of British intelligence. At the highest level, they are all the same organisation.
In 1815, investors at the London Stock Exchange knew the Rothschild intelligence system was better than the British government's, and with the battle raging all eyes were on Nathan Rothschild, the head of the family's London operation, for any sign of what was happening. Had Wellington or Napoleon won?
Rothschild gave the signal for his agents to start selling his stocks and everyone else followed believing that Rothschild must know that Wellington had lost. The market collapsed in the panic and people lost fortunes, but not Rothschild. He gave another coded signal to his agents and they began buying the stocks at the knock-down prices before the official news reached London that Wellington had won the battle, a fact that Rothschild had known all along thanks to his communication network.
Stock prices exploded and it is estimated that the Rothschilds increased their wealth some twenty times on that one day alone. This is how the manipulation works and it is happening every day all over the world, especially through Wall Street, the City of London and the Far East.
They are now using all these techniques to prepare for the economic upheavals that have been long in the planning.
We have had a period of 'boom' which has been fuelled by the Illuminati banking cartel keeping interests low and making loans to almost anyone who wants them. When the lender has not fulfilled the criteria for a 'normal' loan through income or credit history they have been able to go to the so-called 'sub-prime' market.
These sub-prime loans (for those who don't quality for the 'prime' or normal loan) have been made to customers at higher interest rates - to those who, by their circumstances and history, have a big chance of defaulting. Think about the logic. You can't fulfil the financial criteria to pay back a normal loan at the common interest rate so we are going to make you pay more!
... CALCULATED COLLAPSE ...
Hello all ...
The news is filled at the moment with potential horror stories about the world economy and it all has a very familiar ring. Forget about the nonsense you hear from economists and business news correspondents about the 'economic cycle', it's all run like a military operation.
First of all, I should make the point, not that readers of these newsletters need telling, that the economic system is utterly, totally and completely, without any saving grace, insane to the point where nothing less than a padded cell is applicable.
Or, at least it would be if its intention was really to serve the interests of the human race and our shared environment. But, given that its entire structure is there to enslave the global population, the apparently insane morphs into the truly brilliant.
It may appear to be insane, for example, that a basic human need like a home should be considered an object of economic speculation to the extent that when the value goes up it is welcomed as a good thing and when it goes down it is disastrous.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/housing.jpg
If human need were the priority then keeping the cost of housing down would be the primary goal and, within that, would be a system of not charging interest on loans for main homes. Interest on money is a fraud anyway, because how can you charge people for borrowing what does not actually exist, except in theory?
Home loans could be granted in a sane and decent society with just an initial fee for the administration to pay for office and staff expenses and with that the cost of buying a home would plummet overnight with no interest to pay.
But that would empower, not enslave, and so it doesn't happen.
I have a little flat, which I love, on the Isle of Wight and its value goes up and down with the manipulations of the market. But am I alone in that I am glad when I hear that it is not going up in value? It's true. I consider an increase in property prices to be the last thing we need in the world I want to live in.
First of all, what use is the greater value to me when, unless I sell it and rent somewhere, any added value the flat has made will be gone if I buy something similar or bigger because all other properties will have increased in value too??
'It's wonderful, my house is worth so much more than when I bought it'. Yes, mate, and so is everyone else's. And what about the poor buggers who are trying to buy their first home and those with nowhere to live at all?
Oh sod them, eh? 'Ethel, pull up the ladder quick.'
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/propertysign.jpg
What tosh it all is, everything's topsy-turvy. What's good for fairness and justice is bad for the economy on every front and it's meant to be that way. When you charge interest on money you create in the very fabric of that system the human debris, or 'economic losers', that we see across the world.
The simple fact is this: When banks make a loan they 'create' on their computer screens (put into circulation) the amount of the loan. They do not create the interest that will have to be paid on that loan. This means that there is never enough 'money' in circulation to pay back all the principle and interest on the loans that have been made at every level of global society.
Unpayable debt, bankruptcy and economic catastrophe for the victims is built into the system - on purpose. This is how it works:
The economy goes up and down as demanded by the elite few who control it. Quite simply, there is a boom when money is poured into circulation and there's a bust when it is taken out.
Who controls how much money is in circulation? The banks do by how many loans they decide to make, because the issuing of credit 'loans' (money that has never, does not and will never literally exist) is how the overwhelming majority of what we call 'money' comes into circulation.
It may only be theoretical figures on computer screens as I have explained in my books and the newsletter headed 'Money Out Of Nothing' in the website archive. But these figures are used as units of exchange for goods and services and the fewer you have available the fewer goods and services can be bought. When that happens the economy goes on the slide.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/fatcat.jpg
It's a synch to control this when you have the power to decide how much 'money' you will create and circulate and, through your connected networks in government and the central bank, what interest your borrowers will pay. Lowering interest rates puts more money into circulation to be used to buy goods and services (increase economic activity and job opportunity) and putting interest rates up has the opposite effect because more of the peoples' money goes back to the banks.
What is the difference between an economic boom and an economic depression? One thing only - the amount of money in circulation. The banks control this and it allows them to create booms and busts at will. We are now in a time when they want to trigger an enormous economic collapse and that moment is getting closer by the week.
It is the same with the stock markets through which these families are moving trillions of dollars a day around the financial and banking system and deciding if they go up or down, soar or crash. Stock market crashes don't just happen, they are made to happen. Why would they do this when they have so much money invested in these markets? Well, if you know the crash is coming because you are going to cause it, you know to sell stocks at the highest point and buy them back once the crash has happened. In this way, you can increase your holdings massively by acquiring companies at a fraction of the cost before your manipulated collapse.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/November/nathan.jpg
Nathan Rothschild
The most blatant example of this was Nathan Rothschild during the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. The situation was simple: if England's Duke of Wellington won the battle the London Stock Exchange would soar, and if Napoleon, the French leader, prevailed it would collapse.
The Rothschilds ran an information and espionage operation renowned as the fastest in Europe with an extensive network of contacts that used codes and carrier pigeons to communicate secretly and quickly. This intelligence network would eventually develop into Mossad, the 'Israeli' intelligence arm today, as well as the CIA and the modern version of British intelligence. At the highest level, they are all the same organisation.
In 1815, investors at the London Stock Exchange knew the Rothschild intelligence system was better than the British government's, and with the battle raging all eyes were on Nathan Rothschild, the head of the family's London operation, for any sign of what was happening. Had Wellington or Napoleon won?
Rothschild gave the signal for his agents to start selling his stocks and everyone else followed believing that Rothschild must know that Wellington had lost. The market collapsed in the panic and people lost fortunes, but not Rothschild. He gave another coded signal to his agents and they began buying the stocks at the knock-down prices before the official news reached London that Wellington had won the battle, a fact that Rothschild had known all along thanks to his communication network.
Stock prices exploded and it is estimated that the Rothschilds increased their wealth some twenty times on that one day alone. This is how the manipulation works and it is happening every day all over the world, especially through Wall Street, the City of London and the Far East.
They are now using all these techniques to prepare for the economic upheavals that have been long in the planning.
We have had a period of 'boom' which has been fuelled by the Illuminati banking cartel keeping interests low and making loans to almost anyone who wants them. When the lender has not fulfilled the criteria for a 'normal' loan through income or credit history they have been able to go to the so-called 'sub-prime' market.
These sub-prime loans (for those who don't quality for the 'prime' or normal loan) have been made to customers at higher interest rates - to those who, by their circumstances and history, have a big chance of defaulting. Think about the logic. You can't fulfil the financial criteria to pay back a normal loan at the common interest rate so we are going to make you pay more!