Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

You've no doubt heard the phrase "Bush's third term" banded around by campaigners in reference to Sen. John McCain. But what we should really be worried about is Clinton's third term!

Since there has only been one President Clinton for there to be a third Clinton Term it must refer to Bill Clinton and not his wife who is out the race for President...or is she?

Heres whats gonna happen.

Obama will will the presidential election with Hilary as his VP.

During office he will change the rules so that should a VP die or be promoted to President upon the exit of the serving President then that VP can appoint a new VP.

He will also remove restrictions on how long a President can serve...Then to prove how American he is he will introduce tough immigration laws...against Mexicans and Hispanics who are becomming the largest group in America.

However, the law wont stop at Hispanics...soon all Catholic citizens will be asked to leave the country- White Anglo-Protestant land!

Obama will then find his own problems with immigration and it will be decided he cant serve as President given his past...so he steps down.

Hilary takes over, who does she appoint as VP?

Bill...

Hilary then steps down and Bill is back in!

- yawn -

This wouldn't happen...

Hillary is 10x worse than Bill...

If anything, it'd be Hillary in control, and Bill as her vice... But even then, I don't see it happening like that...

I see Obama getting assassinated by "bigots" (CIA agents), and THEN Hillary takes over...

Originally posted by Bat Dude
This wouldn't happen...

Hillary is 10x worse than Bill...

If anything, it'd be Hillary in control, and Bill as her vice... But even then, I don't see it happening like that...

I see Obama getting assassinated by "bigots" (CIA agents), and THEN Hillary takes over...

Yeah thats something I been thinking about.That just might happen.If Obama gets elected,I sure hope he doesnt make Hillary his V.P because you can count on him getting assassinated by CIA agents if that happens so they can get Hillary in.and as evil and bad as Bill is,Hillary is 10x's worse.

and when he doesn't get assassinated will you STFU forever and go crawl under a rock?

... this is tremendously stupid.

Originally posted by jaden101
and when he doesn't get assassinated will you STFU forever and go crawl under a rock?

Wow, you're full of respect for your fellow members, aren't you?

yes...those that deserve it anyway

Originally posted by jaden101
yes...those that deserve it anyway

So everyone, right?

nope...you earn respect...well...some people do

I think we have to really explore the underlying theme of this thread...

you mean like the stuff you say obama will do that he doesnt actually have the power to do...like change how long a president can be in office

Originally posted by jaden101
you mean like the stuff you say obama will do that he doesnt actually have the power to do...like change how long a president can be in office

No like how easy it is to invent a rumour and have people run along and support it...

I think its fitting considering the nature of conspiracy.

now apparently that is exceptionally easy...as most conspiracies prove

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Wow, you're full of respect for your fellow members, aren't you?

yeah I know.I cant believe they don't ban this kid and they allow him to act like this. I'm just repeating what you said,the guy obviously has a pathetic obsession with me since YOU were the first to say it but he never said nothing to you about it.

Actually I dont think he will get assassinated cause he is a member of the CFR.You cant get elected president if your not a member of the CFR.Even Kennedy was but he only attended a couple of meetings and did not agree with their world agenda.Since he didnt agree with them,well the rest is history.Obama is a regular member of the CFR so I really dont think he will get assassinated.Neither Obama or Mccain are for us,their puppets for the CFR's plans and I just dont see Obama making Mrs Clinton his vice. Thats why I say,either way with McCain or Obama in office,were screwed.The media sure went to extremes to sabatoge Ron Pauls efforts to be president.They never wanted him in office cause he isnt a member of the CFR and does not agree with their agenda,he was the only candidate for the people so he never had a chance to get elected.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
yeah I know.I cant believe they don't ban this kid and they allow him to act like this. I'm just repeating what you said,the guy obviously has a pathetic obsession with me since YOU were the first to say it but he never said nothing to you about it.



Hahaha...Kid?...We've been through this before...clearly you're the one who's about 13 years old...your extremely poor English and your continuing misuse of the words "your" and "you're" as well as "they're" "their" and "there" are testament to.

Not to mention, as has been previously highlighted, your continual emphasis of the wrong words.

I have no obsession with you...I just can't stop pointing out your idiocy.

In the space of a page you've already said Obama will get assassinated...and then said he wont.

Kind of says all we need to know really doesn't it?

The media went to extremes to sabotage Ron Paul?...you mean by not covering him?...hardly extreme is it?...I think what really ended Ron Paul's chances are the fact he advocated turing the US into another North Korea in terms of excluding themselves from the world and withdrawing from the UN, NATO and every other treaty and organisation that requires multilateral cooperation.

Of course...it's easier just to blame it on something that you think you understand instead of actually going and finding out his policies and how the world works

Originally posted by jaden101
The media went to extremes to sabotage Ron Paul?...you mean by not covering him?...hardly extreme is it?...I think what really ended Ron Paul's chances are the fact he advocated turing the US into another North Korea in terms of excluding themselves from the world and withdrawing from the UN, NATO and every other treaty and organisation that requires multilateral cooperation.

Of course...it's easier just to blame it on something that you think you understand instead of actually going and finding out his policies and how the world works

Why would they not cover him, though? I thought news stations were supposed to cover all candidates... Just because his policies were different doesn't mean they couldn't at least give him the attention the other candidates got... They were purposely censoring him from the voters who get their news from the TV (which, sadly, is a lot)... That's why Ron Paul has such a following on the internet... They can look at his policies for themselves, and decide whether they like him for president or not...

And non-intervention does not equal isolationism... Just because he doesn't want to bother anyone doesn't mean he wants to completely isolate America... He's said time and again that he wants open trade relations with almost all countries... He just doesn't want to interfere in their business...

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Why would they not cover him, though? I thought news stations were supposed to cover all candidates... Just because his policies were different doesn't mean they couldn't at least give him the attention the other candidates got... They were purposely censoring him from the voters who get their news from the TV (which, sadly, is a lot)... That's why Ron Paul has such a following on the internet... They can look at his policies for themselves, and decide whether they like him for president or not...



there were 26 candidates that started the presidential campaign...why dont i hear the same bleating about the other 22 who recieved virtually no media coverage?....this would include people who recieved the backing of alot more delegates than Ron Paul...even Mitt Romney got more backing in the initial stages of campaigning

here's the full list

Joe Biden (Democratic)
Sam Brownback (Republican)
Eric Chester (Socialist)
Hillary Clinton (Democratic)
Chris Dodd (Democratic)
Mike Gravel (Democratic, Libertarian)
Rudy Giuliani (Republican)
Mike Huckabee (Republican)
Duncan Hunter (Republican)
Jesse Johnson (Green)
Alan Keyes (Republican, Constitution)
Steve Kubby (Libertarian)
Dennis Kucinich (Democratic)
Cynthia McKinney (Green)
Kent Mesplay (Green)
Ron Paul (Republican)
George Phillies (Libertarian)
Bill Richardson (Democratic)
Mitt Romney (Republican)
Wayne Allyn Root (Libertarian)
Mary Ruwart (Libertarian)
Kat Swift (Green)
Tom Tancredo (Republican)
Fred Thompson (Republican)
Tom Vilsack (Democratic)

3 of the green party members are still battling for their parties nomination but you dont hear a thing about that...why?...cause nobody cares

as for the republican nominees

here's the pledged delegate results for how much support they had in their parties

John McCain 1,378
Mike Huckabee 240
Mitt Romney 148
Ron Paul 14

so should think that the real reason he never got covered is that he never had any support

it's the political equivalent of putting on the Rochdale match on prime time TV and ingoring the chelsea v man u game....the fact is...nobody cares about him



so he wants all the benefits of excercising the US's economic strength but none of the responsibility for what that does to the coutries it trades with?

there are already countless examples of the US abusing it's power into forcing countries to trade with them and handing over their goods for ridiculously low and insustainable prices...as i've said before, even the US's allies aren't immune to this behavious...UK supermarkets refused to by their Bananas from US controlled plantations, instead trying to introduce fair trade policies with poorer countries...and the US said they would embargo many UK made products if they didn't cooperate

the US is solely responsible for the poor living conditions in Cuba because they put complete embargo'

s on anyone who trades with them....did you know that anyone who works, even for a day in Cuba, is no longer allowed to work in the US

i 1st found that out when the manic street preachers played there in 2001 and were subsequently told they could never play in the US again

not to mention the countless examples of the US exploiting low wages in other countries and effectively outsourcing slavery to reap the rewards

he's quite happy to allow these things to continue....but he wants to wash his hands of the problems these policies cause

nice bloke really eh?

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Why would they not cover him, though? I thought news stations were supposed to cover all candidates... Just because his policies were different doesn't mean they couldn't at least give him the attention the other candidates got... They were purposely censoring him from the voters who get their news from the TV (which, sadly, is a lot)... That's why Ron Paul has such a following on the internet... They can look at his policies for themselves, and decide whether they like him for president or not...

And non-intervention does not equal isolationism... Just because he doesn't want to bother anyone doesn't mean he wants to completely isolate America... He's said time and again that he wants open trade relations with almost all countries... He just doesn't want to interfere in their business...

Exactly.There was a total media blackout on Ron Paul.He got nowhere near the coverage from the corporate controlled media that all the other candiates got.There were times when the cameras would go down the rows and focus on the candiates and give them their airtime and at times,they did not give Ron Paul the same amount of time they gave the others,I know cause I saw it happen at least twice. No media conspiracy here? yeah right,give me a freaking break. yeah so what if his policies are different,he should have been allowed to have the same attention the others did.

There is obviously a media conspiracy against Ron Paul.He was on jay Leno talking about how he was going to file a lawsuit against New Hampshire in the new hampshire primarys.Leno was saying to him-I thought that was totally unfair how they did not allow you to participate in the new hampshire primarys and Paul responded saying-Yeah it was unfair.It was unfair and were filing a lawsuit against them.

Thats vote fraud and thats illegal.So much for america being home of the free.what a great country this is.

The evidence is overwhelming that there is a conspiracy by the corporate controlled media againt Paul.They announced it on the world wide news that he had dropped out which is complete B.S.He hasnt dropped out like they keep saying he has,he's still running.They just want everybody to believe that cause they dont want to cover him.

Also,Ron Paul was on Alex Jones show talking about how there was an assassination attempt on his life.It was witnessed by several people that Paul was escorted away from many cameras where there were just a few taking pictures and according to witnesses,a man drew a gun but turned away and walked off reportedly because there were still too many cameras there that would have had him on film is why they think he didnt go ahead with the attempt.That was brought up in the general discussion section by some people a few months back.


That being said,No I seriously doubt that Obama would be assassinated IF he made Hillary his vice,I only said in the beginning he would IF he made Mrs Clinton his vice.we dont know if he will or not yet.They wouldnt have any reason to want to get rid of Obama because again he is a regular member of the CFR and will do what they want him to do.Obama could choose Hillary for his running mate and Hillary would run the country again like she did when Bill was president and like Bill,Obama would just be their puppet and appear to be the president while Hillary was running the show again.

Now if Ron Paul miracoulously got elected and he was stupid enough to make McCain his vice,well THEN I would say that Paul would get assassinated and McCain would become the new president but we already know Paul will never get elected so that wont happen. anyways,its really a moot issue now cause they already got their wish and their going to get one of their two CFR puppets McCain or Obama in office to continue their one world government agenda plan.so right now,the evil and powerful CFR group are just deciding whos the more evil candidate of the two to get in.They never give us a choice to select from.were always forced to root for the lesser of the two evil to get in.

so could you factually prove he got less air time than most of the libertarian and green candidates?

please do so if you can

Originally posted by jaden101
so could you factually prove he got less air time than most of the libertarian and green candidates?

please do so if you can

That's not fair, either...

It all depends on if those candidates are CFR members or not... If they are, then that may be evidence against the media conspiracy...

But if they aren't, then it just shows that the only reason Ron Paul got ANY screen time is because he has a large following, and if they didn't give him any screen time, people would notice it and protest... Not so with the Green and Liberatarian candidates... They don't get any screen time at all EVER, and the mainstream community is used to it, so the media doesn't have to cover it up when they don't give them air time...

but he didn't have huge following did he?...hence he got the support of less delegates than Romney

by the way...you do realise ANYONE between the ages of 30 and 36 can apply to be a member of the CFR? (strange age limits i know)

it also doesn't seem that the CFR are biased against him in anyway

http://www.cfr.org/bios/13303/ron_paul.html

besides the only reason he isn't a member of the CFR is that he doesn't want any foreign relations...he also said in an interview about them "i'm still waiting on my invitation"...well you dont get invited...you apply to join

perhaps it would be better if he did join...as he claims they are highly influential...so would it not be best it he joined then he could exert more influence over foreign policy that he believes is right?

regardless...your 1st point says it all "that's not fair"....hahaha...boohoo

Originally posted by jaden101
but he didn't have huge following did he?...hence he got the support of less delegates than Romney

by the way...you do realise ANYONE between the ages of 30 and 36 can apply to be a member of the CFR? (strange age limits i know)

it also doesn't seem that the CFR are biased against him in anyway

http://www.cfr.org/bios/13303/ron_paul.html

besides the only reason he isn't a member of the CFR is that he doesn't want any foreign relations...he also said in an interview about them "i'm still waiting on my invitation"...well you dont get invited...you apply to join

perhaps it would be better if he did join...as he claims they are highly influential...so would it not be best it he joined then he could exert more influence over foreign policy that he believes is right?

regardless...your 1st point says it all "that's not fair"....hahaha...boohoo

Taunting isn't a very respectful thing to do...

And the fact that the independent parties don't get any coverage is not fair... There's no dodging that...

The media doesn't want anyone noticing other parties... Let the people see every party and candidate, and then they can truly make an educated decision... But, as we all know, they don't want us to do that...

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
You've no doubt heard the phrase "Bush's third term" banded around by campaigners in reference to Sen. John McCain. But what we should really be worried about is Clinton's third term!

Since there has only been one President Clinton for there to be a third Clinton Term it must refer to Bill Clinton and not his wife who is out the race for President...or is she?

Heres whats gonna happen.

Obama will will the presidential election with Hilary as his VP. No, Obama is likely to pick Tim Kaine or Evan Bayh as VP, Hillary is old news and only for the retarded Hillary supporters.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
During office he will change the rules so that should a VP die or be promoted to President upon the exit of the serving President then that VP can appoint a new VP. Did you just say if a VP dies, the VP picks the next VP?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
He will also remove restrictions on how long a President can serve... Yeah, that'll be popular, and be approved by congress.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Then to prove how American he is he will introduce tough immigration laws...against Mexicans and Hispanics who are becomming the largest group in America. I really don't need to call you stupid for this statement.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
However, the law wont stop at Hispanics...soon all Catholic citizens will be asked to leave the country- White Anglo-Protestant land! See above.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Obama will then find his own problems with immigration and it will be decided he cant serve as President given his past...so he steps down. He creates a policy that ****s himself in the ass? Carrying on the presidential tradition I see.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Hilary takes over, who does she appoint as VP?

Bill...

Hilary then steps down and Bill is back in! If this took place, this would all have to happen in the first term, because there's no way they'll get elected after, and by the time Bill is pres again, he won't be re-elected because people won't vote for someone thrice, not after FDR (You could count LBJ as well).

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Taunting isn't a very respectful thing to do...

And the fact that the independent parties don't get any coverage is not fair... There's no dodging that...

The media doesn't want anyone noticing other parties... Let the people see every party and candidate, and then they can truly make an educated decision... But, as we all know, they don't want us to do that...

it's no secret that media executives have a political standpoint...just like everyone is entitled to...and yes it's the case that they have a massive influence over how the masses think by the skew they put on their broadcasts...but it's hardly their fault that people, in general, are too stupid to realise that.

if you owned a media broadcasting company and you badly wanted a particular candidate's message to be put out to the people...wouldn't you help out?

so yes...while it may be unfair that some candidates can use that tool to their advantage...it's certainly not a conspiracy

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Taunting isn't a very respectful thing to do...

And the fact that the independent parties don't get any coverage is not fair... There's no dodging that...

The media doesn't want anyone noticing other parties... Let the people see every party and candidate, and then they can truly make an educated decision... But, as we all know, they don't want us to do that...

thats how kids act though.yeah you cant get around that that independent parites dont get any media coverage and that point of his about anybody applying for membership for the CFR is just plain stupid cause they only remain members of the CFR once they find out how they operate and what their world agenda is if they are in the same evil and corrupt mode they are. Thats why Ron Paul doesnt want to have anything to do with them and which is why Mccain and Obama have remained CFR members.

btw Batdude,just so you know,Ron Paul is running on the republican ticket.The only reason being is because he is aware that the independent party never gets elected when they run on the independent ticket.The Elete always make sure that either a democrat or republican gets elected.He used to be a Republican,he met Reagan a few times when he was president.He then later discovered though up in washington how there is no difference between the republicans and the democrats,that they have the same agenda of a one world government and thats when he switched to being an independent.Theres no difference between the two parties,they both represent the goals of the CFR group which again is why they dont care if either McCain or Obama gets elected since they will do the bidding of the CFR and do whatever they ask of them.

Theres no difference between the two parties,the name is the ONLY thing that makes them different.They are exactly alike though so thats why the people in the know how,refer to them as the reprocrats and the demopublicans since they all pretty much sleep in bed together.It goes way back at least decades.I documented on my Clinton thread as you saw,how Clinton and Bush have been long time friends dating back to Clintons days as Governor of Arkansas,same with LBJ and Dick Nixon.They had a long standing freindship that dated back to the 50's and both were pals with J Edgar Hoover.The CFR loved LBJ nd Nixon.They were both men they knew could be bought off to do their bidding.Kennedy couldnt be bought off -he didnt need money,he was rich beyond your imagination,and thats why they got rid of him,cause he couldnt be bought off to do their bidding.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Hilary takes over, who does she appoint as VP?

Bill...

Hilary then steps down and Bill is back in! Um, read the 22nd Amendment.

What I don't get, is if they want McCain, why didn't they just get him in in 2000?

Originally posted by Strangelove
Um, read the 22nd Amendment.

It was a send up