Deano
KNOW ALL, BUT DO NOTHING? ...
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a01.jpg
.. 'WOKEN UP', BUT STILL ASLEEP?
Hello all,
I am often asked what life will be like if we allow the crazies behind the global conspiracy to impose their world fascism. The answer can both be long and detailed or encapsulated in a few words ... control of all that you do, say and think.
But then, we hardly need to be told what will happen any longer because it is already happening. Take this Reuters report from China this week headed 'Beijing police ask about shoe size, politics, cash':
'Living in Beijing? The government wants to know your shoe size, blood group, political affiliation and where you get your money from, according to police in at least one corner of the security-obsessed Olympic host city. Questionnaires handed to a businessman in Beijing's east also demanded full technical details of the company computer network and a hand-drawn map of Internet connections ...
... Residents of the capital have got used to over-zealous police intruding into their lives. Visitors, even those who stay only one night, are expected to register at the local police station. Police sometimes call to ask why if they do not.'
China is a blueprint for how the bloodline network called the Illuminati wants the world to be, and so study China today if you want to see how everywhere is designed to be in the next decade or so.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a02.jpg
What is happening in China is being introduced by ever-faster step-by-steps throughout the world. This is possible because, as I said last week, the bloodline cabal is structured like a transnational corporation with the headquarters dictating to its subsidiary networks in each country. This allows the same agenda to be introduced in 'different' countries at the same time.
The 'process of transformation', as they call it, can take longer in the so-called 'free' democracies because they have to pay at least passing reference to the illusion that their population is indeed 'free', although even that is being eroded as the pace of change increases.
(By the way, this is the reason why 'change' is now being endlessly parroted by Illuminati front-men like Obama - the transformation of society into a global dictatorship requires, by definition, constant 'change'.)
In the official dictatorships, like China, there is no reason for propaganda about 'freedom of the people' because there isn't any and the government doesn't care that everyone knows that. So these public expressions of the global dictatorship, most notably China, lead the field in the race to Orwell's nightmare. Therefore, China today is what the world is planned to be like very soon when the 'West' catches up.
I heard a radio interview this week with the Chinese Ambassador to London, a lady named 'Fu Ying', which, after hearing her speak, must surely be pronounced Fool Ling. When she was asked why there was no Internet freedom in China she simply said that there was.
'Why can't Chinese people access my website?' asked a political blogger.
'Well, why would they want to?', Fool Ling replied, 'when it is not in Chinese'.
(This part of the exchange was deleted from the 'transcript' of the interview on the Chinese Embassy Website.)
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a03.jpg
Fool Ling
Here you had a Chinese government parrot questioned about the blatant fact that the Internet is massively censored in China and all she does is deny it. What's more, the BBC guy handling the discussion allowed her to do so when he could have factually pinned her to the studio wall had he persisted.
What happens in fully-fledged dictatorships is that what the government says automatically becomes the truth, end of story. So when they say that censorship is not censorship, it's not censorship and if you have the nerve to still claim that it is, you will be censored.
This is what is happening in China and increasingly all over the world. Note how the governments of the 'free democracies' are less and less bothering to even try to justify control and censorship. It's a case of 'this is what we're doing and that's it'. If you don't like it, too bad; if you have got a cast iron case to demolish our arguments, it doesn't matter - we're doing it anyway.
This only happens when those in authority are confident that control of the people has reached a point where there is no need to be concerned about little things like public opinion. The very fact that we have reached that point should focus the minds of everyone who cares about their own freedom and that of their children and grandchildren.
What I am saying here is that we are closing in on a point of no return. I don't say that in the literal sense because everything is reversible, but it's a point where the 'return' is going to be very much harder to secure. Doing nothing, therefore, is not an option, unless we want to live in a global prison state and have our children and grandchildren spend virtually their entire lives in a global Nazi Germany or Communist China.
Which brings me to Ezra Levant. For those who don't know of him, he's quite a well-known figure in Canada, a lawyer who has been involved in what is termed 'conservative' politics and also in journalism. This included the co-founding of the now-defunct Western Standard magazine.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a04.jpg
Levant is Jewish, a passionate supporter of Israel and has worked with neocons, or neoconservatives, like Bush speech-writer David Frum from the American Enterprise Institute and its Canadian equivalent, the Fraser Institute.
Frum, a Jewish-Canadian by birth, wrote the 'Axis of Evil' speech that was straight off the pages of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) document in September 2000 called Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.
The PNAC interlocked with the American Enterprise Institute ('Resident Scholar', David Frum) and other neocon organisations to form the network that controlled the Bush administration from the start and has used it to impose the very agenda of invasion and conquest outlined in that PNAC document published a year to the month before 9/11 and a few months before 'Bush', or rather his controllers, came to power.
To say the least I have next to nothing in common with Ezra Levant. I am not Jewish; I say that Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom being used to advance a global Orwellian agenda at the expense of the vast majority of Jewish people; I think neocons like David Frum are despicable; and the network Frum and his like represent is an affront to everything I stand for - freedom, fairness and justice for all.
For his part, Levant rejects any suggestion that there is a global conspiracy to impose a fascist dictatorship, especially not one involving the Rothschilds and Israel or the Rothschild-controlled, Israel-controlled neocon cabal.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a05.jpg
But there is something we do agree on despite all of this and it is fundamental to what we need to understand if we are to wake up from Orwell's gathering nightmare. We agree on freedom of expression for all views, even if we don't agree with them.
Of course, Ezra Levant may not really believe what he claims to believe, but I have seen nothing in his actions and his passionately delivered words to think that he is not genuine in what he says. Quite the opposite, in fact, and if he's not genuine about freedom of speech then he ought to be in Hollywood because he must be a fantastic actor.
In many ways, Ezra Levant is much more an 'old' conservative, who sees freedom of expression as a fundamental right, rather than a new or neo-conservative who wants all freedoms and rights conceded to a central control system. To this deeply sick neocon mentality, 'freedom' is the freedom for the few to control the many in every aspect of their lives while, ironically, claiming to stand for the opposite.
Levant's main focus is what he calls Muslim extremists who are destroying freedom of expression by seeking to deny any criticism of Islam. But he exposes the 'Jewish' organisations like the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Simon Wiesenthal Center for their support for government agencies, especially the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which are destroying freedom of speech under a mountain of fascist legislation, dictatorial bureaucracy and kangaroo courts, or 'tribunals'.
He is also as outraged when a Christian pastor is vilified by these tribunals as he would be if it were a Jewish rabbi. And it is here that common ground can be found between us - and by 'us' I mean all of us, not just Levant and myself.
Any dictatorship has to secure its power by divide and rule and to do this it creates and exploits the fault-lines of religion, politics, income bracket, culture and all the rest. It creates 'sides', or exploits the 'sides' that already exist, and plays them off against each other.
This has so many benefits for any would-be tyranny. Firstly, it engages different groups in society in wars against each other, so destroying any unified response to the force that threatens them all. People are so busy abusing and fighting between themselves that they don't see that the strings attached to all of them are held by the same hand.
It's a puppet show, but people can't see it because Punch and Judy are so engrossed in their mutual abuse and their own sense of superiority.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a01.jpg
.. 'WOKEN UP', BUT STILL ASLEEP?
Hello all,
I am often asked what life will be like if we allow the crazies behind the global conspiracy to impose their world fascism. The answer can both be long and detailed or encapsulated in a few words ... control of all that you do, say and think.
But then, we hardly need to be told what will happen any longer because it is already happening. Take this Reuters report from China this week headed 'Beijing police ask about shoe size, politics, cash':
'Living in Beijing? The government wants to know your shoe size, blood group, political affiliation and where you get your money from, according to police in at least one corner of the security-obsessed Olympic host city. Questionnaires handed to a businessman in Beijing's east also demanded full technical details of the company computer network and a hand-drawn map of Internet connections ...
... Residents of the capital have got used to over-zealous police intruding into their lives. Visitors, even those who stay only one night, are expected to register at the local police station. Police sometimes call to ask why if they do not.'
China is a blueprint for how the bloodline network called the Illuminati wants the world to be, and so study China today if you want to see how everywhere is designed to be in the next decade or so.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a02.jpg
What is happening in China is being introduced by ever-faster step-by-steps throughout the world. This is possible because, as I said last week, the bloodline cabal is structured like a transnational corporation with the headquarters dictating to its subsidiary networks in each country. This allows the same agenda to be introduced in 'different' countries at the same time.
The 'process of transformation', as they call it, can take longer in the so-called 'free' democracies because they have to pay at least passing reference to the illusion that their population is indeed 'free', although even that is being eroded as the pace of change increases.
(By the way, this is the reason why 'change' is now being endlessly parroted by Illuminati front-men like Obama - the transformation of society into a global dictatorship requires, by definition, constant 'change'.)
In the official dictatorships, like China, there is no reason for propaganda about 'freedom of the people' because there isn't any and the government doesn't care that everyone knows that. So these public expressions of the global dictatorship, most notably China, lead the field in the race to Orwell's nightmare. Therefore, China today is what the world is planned to be like very soon when the 'West' catches up.
I heard a radio interview this week with the Chinese Ambassador to London, a lady named 'Fu Ying', which, after hearing her speak, must surely be pronounced Fool Ling. When she was asked why there was no Internet freedom in China she simply said that there was.
'Why can't Chinese people access my website?' asked a political blogger.
'Well, why would they want to?', Fool Ling replied, 'when it is not in Chinese'.
(This part of the exchange was deleted from the 'transcript' of the interview on the Chinese Embassy Website.)
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a03.jpg
Fool Ling
Here you had a Chinese government parrot questioned about the blatant fact that the Internet is massively censored in China and all she does is deny it. What's more, the BBC guy handling the discussion allowed her to do so when he could have factually pinned her to the studio wall had he persisted.
What happens in fully-fledged dictatorships is that what the government says automatically becomes the truth, end of story. So when they say that censorship is not censorship, it's not censorship and if you have the nerve to still claim that it is, you will be censored.
This is what is happening in China and increasingly all over the world. Note how the governments of the 'free democracies' are less and less bothering to even try to justify control and censorship. It's a case of 'this is what we're doing and that's it'. If you don't like it, too bad; if you have got a cast iron case to demolish our arguments, it doesn't matter - we're doing it anyway.
This only happens when those in authority are confident that control of the people has reached a point where there is no need to be concerned about little things like public opinion. The very fact that we have reached that point should focus the minds of everyone who cares about their own freedom and that of their children and grandchildren.
What I am saying here is that we are closing in on a point of no return. I don't say that in the literal sense because everything is reversible, but it's a point where the 'return' is going to be very much harder to secure. Doing nothing, therefore, is not an option, unless we want to live in a global prison state and have our children and grandchildren spend virtually their entire lives in a global Nazi Germany or Communist China.
Which brings me to Ezra Levant. For those who don't know of him, he's quite a well-known figure in Canada, a lawyer who has been involved in what is termed 'conservative' politics and also in journalism. This included the co-founding of the now-defunct Western Standard magazine.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a04.jpg
Levant is Jewish, a passionate supporter of Israel and has worked with neocons, or neoconservatives, like Bush speech-writer David Frum from the American Enterprise Institute and its Canadian equivalent, the Fraser Institute.
Frum, a Jewish-Canadian by birth, wrote the 'Axis of Evil' speech that was straight off the pages of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) document in September 2000 called Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.
The PNAC interlocked with the American Enterprise Institute ('Resident Scholar', David Frum) and other neocon organisations to form the network that controlled the Bush administration from the start and has used it to impose the very agenda of invasion and conquest outlined in that PNAC document published a year to the month before 9/11 and a few months before 'Bush', or rather his controllers, came to power.
To say the least I have next to nothing in common with Ezra Levant. I am not Jewish; I say that Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom being used to advance a global Orwellian agenda at the expense of the vast majority of Jewish people; I think neocons like David Frum are despicable; and the network Frum and his like represent is an affront to everything I stand for - freedom, fairness and justice for all.
For his part, Levant rejects any suggestion that there is a global conspiracy to impose a fascist dictatorship, especially not one involving the Rothschilds and Israel or the Rothschild-controlled, Israel-controlled neocon cabal.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/August/a05.jpg
But there is something we do agree on despite all of this and it is fundamental to what we need to understand if we are to wake up from Orwell's gathering nightmare. We agree on freedom of expression for all views, even if we don't agree with them.
Of course, Ezra Levant may not really believe what he claims to believe, but I have seen nothing in his actions and his passionately delivered words to think that he is not genuine in what he says. Quite the opposite, in fact, and if he's not genuine about freedom of speech then he ought to be in Hollywood because he must be a fantastic actor.
In many ways, Ezra Levant is much more an 'old' conservative, who sees freedom of expression as a fundamental right, rather than a new or neo-conservative who wants all freedoms and rights conceded to a central control system. To this deeply sick neocon mentality, 'freedom' is the freedom for the few to control the many in every aspect of their lives while, ironically, claiming to stand for the opposite.
Levant's main focus is what he calls Muslim extremists who are destroying freedom of expression by seeking to deny any criticism of Islam. But he exposes the 'Jewish' organisations like the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Simon Wiesenthal Center for their support for government agencies, especially the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which are destroying freedom of speech under a mountain of fascist legislation, dictatorial bureaucracy and kangaroo courts, or 'tribunals'.
He is also as outraged when a Christian pastor is vilified by these tribunals as he would be if it were a Jewish rabbi. And it is here that common ground can be found between us - and by 'us' I mean all of us, not just Levant and myself.
Any dictatorship has to secure its power by divide and rule and to do this it creates and exploits the fault-lines of religion, politics, income bracket, culture and all the rest. It creates 'sides', or exploits the 'sides' that already exist, and plays them off against each other.
This has so many benefits for any would-be tyranny. Firstly, it engages different groups in society in wars against each other, so destroying any unified response to the force that threatens them all. People are so busy abusing and fighting between themselves that they don't see that the strings attached to all of them are held by the same hand.
It's a puppet show, but people can't see it because Punch and Judy are so engrossed in their mutual abuse and their own sense of superiority.