Originally posted by Sado22
dude, ken never came close to the kind of feat Paul has shown. the day ken dusts a larger-than-human boulder with a single punch, let me know.
* i love both characters, dude... i never said Ken is stronger than Paul, i've given that criteria to Paul, but Ken is not far behind... just like in speed category where i said Ken is quicker than Paul but Paul is not far behind...
Originally posted by Sado22
Paul's 48 years old, hasn't slowed down a bit and has been training deligently not only in dojos but also on the streets. Ken dojo dorked for 10 years,
* Ken is in a serious training with Ryu... SF canon plotguide even said that he was even a virgin before he met Eliza proving he is practicing abstinence during his training...
Originally posted by Sado22
stopped it and went to American, got hitched and between SFA3 and SF2 he was actually bumming around and neglecting his training (only ryu's challenge made him train again).
true, Ken's fighting spirit deteriorated when he settled down to raised a family with Eliza, but when he received a letter from Ryu and was encouraged to enter the tournament (SF 3), his spirit was rekindled... he was on his tip-top shape once again, and added Shippu Jinrai Kyaku to his deadly arsenal...
Originally posted by Sado22
Paul lost to Kuma because of recklessnes, true, but keep in mind that he just got screwed in the T3 tournament (having won it, remaining undefeated against all opponents and even defeating Ogre but not being named champ because Jin Kazama defeated True Ogre). he lost focus because he was disappointed and he was overly conscerned with wanting to fight Kazuya again he was being reckless.
* i still think it's pretty even... Paul, while being stronger, tends to lose focus... i think it's a draw in skill and experience...
Originally posted by Sado22
keep in mind also that paul has more diversity than ken. while ken only has karate strikes, Paul has judo, submission, sambo, brawling, karate etc...he's actually MMA. he also has reversals, holds, throws and other things. that's why i'd give skill and experience to Paul, not ken.
* i don't know about this concept, but what i can remember from the battle of Sanosuke and the monk Angie (Rurouni Kenshin), Kenshin advised Sanosuke that a man having two swords does not mean he can always beat a man having only one... even if you have only one but you can hit more effective shots, that's what counts most... similarly, Paul having many martial arts in his arsenal does not automatically mean he can beat anyone who has known lesser... but i gave Paul that credit that's why i still say they're even in skill...
Originally posted by Sado22
he never defeated Kazuya.
* yes... sorry... Paul defeated Ogre, and walked out thinking he was already the winner not knowing True Ogre emerged afterwards...
* Paul never defeated Kazuya, but he stalemated him proving his great strength and skill...
Originally posted by Sado22
Ken has defeated Ryu once when ryu wasn't focused and in SF2 which isn't canonically prooved as of yet.
* it was already confirmed that Ken really did beat an unfocused Ryu, but that does not mean anyone can beat Ryu in that state... they have been rivals and who knows how many matches they have made with each other... it can be correctly implied that Ken really is as good as Ryu... and with that, any Ryu feat can also be related with Ken but in a lesser degree, am i right?
Originally posted by Sado22
Paul has a draw with Kazuya, an unconfirmed but obvious win over Heihachi and pre-devil Jin in Tekken3, a win over Ogre and a wiped the floor with two girzzly bears without weapons or projectiles. Paul has defeated the toptiers of his universe......and please remember that the Mishima's have shown endurance, durablity and power feats that Ken can't even compare to (or even ryu for that matter).
* but can be compared with Gouki, perhaps? but not Shin Gouki of course... i don't know, i think Ken and Ryu can hold their own against a normal Gouki...
Originally posted by Sado22
this one i'd give to Ken. Paul aint slow at all but Ken is more speed based than Paul who is power based.
* agreed...
Originally posted by Sado22
true, but aside from range, hadouken hold no other advantage.
* yes, and range is, if not the best, one of the best advantages in a fight...
Originally posted by Sado22
yes he is as good as ryu, but even between ryu and paul, i'd give the fight to Paul. power, speed, experience, durability all backed by feats as opposed to boring 3 moves that have no feats.
Paul>Ken, 7/10
Paul>Ryu, 6/10
~Sado
* feats or no feats, the strength of the character can also be seen in their canon storyline... well, yeah, having no feats is clearly <<< over someone who has but judging from gameplay, i lean towards a quicker character over someone who is stronger...