Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

We all know that Smeagol killed Deagol, because he he wanted the ring from him & it drove him mad. In ROTK, when Frodo finds out that Sam has the ring, he's determent for Sam to give it back. however, Sam hesitates, but slowly gives it back, & Frodo snatches it out of his hand. If Sam hadn't given him the ring. Do you think Frodo may have become really angry, & in his anger would murder Sam? Do you think it could get that far, if Sam didn't give him the ring? Please give me your thoughts in the comments.

Come on someone! Please reply!

No, because it has already been written on page.

Originally posted by Kazenji
it has already been written on page.
What do you mean?

Can someone please give me a good reply on this!

Yes, because the Ring was all too powerful and he would have killed for the Ring.

Originally posted by Cat Lady
Yes, because the Ring was all too powerful and he would have killed for the Ring.
Yes, I think he would likely kill for the ring too. Thank you for answering!